IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i23p10505-d1533427.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost Estimation for the Operation and Maintenance of Automated Monitoring and Early-Warning Equipment for Geological Hazards

Author

Listed:
  • Gan Luo

    (Development and Research Center, China Geological Survey, Beijing 100037, China)

  • Mingqi Tao

    (Development and Research Center, China Geological Survey, Beijing 100037, China)

  • Baohe Wu

    (Institute of Exploration Technology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Chengdu 611734, China)

  • Mingzhi Zhang

    (Chinese Institute of Geological Environment Monitoring, Beijing 100081, China
    Observation and Research Station of Geological Hazard in Sichuan Ya’an, Ministry of Natural Resources, Ya’an 625099, China)

  • Shuai Zhong

    (Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Junfeng Li

    (Chinese Institute of Geological Environment Monitoring, Beijing 100081, China
    Observation and Research Station of Geological Hazard in Sichuan Ya’an, Ministry of Natural Resources, Ya’an 625099, China)

  • Xiaodi Yang

    (Institute of Exploration Technology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Chengdu 611734, China)

Abstract

Geological hazards impede regional economy sustainability. To limit their destructive impacts on human life and property, the Chinese government has independently developed automated monitoring and early-warning equipment, which has been deployed in over 250,000 locations nationwide, yielding effective early warnings. The smooth operation of this equipment necessitates substantial human, material, and financial resources for its maintenance. To allocate funds rationally, the Ministry of Finance of China has mandated the urgent establishment of budget standards for the operation and maintenance of automated monitoring and early-warning systems for geological hazards. Addressing the research gap in this area, this study meticulously develops a cost model, subcategorizing operating costs, maintenance costs, and management costs. Addressing the intricate issue of maintenance expenditures, this study ingeniously breaks down routine operations and urgent repairs stipulated in technical standards into personnel, materials, and vehicular needs for each equipment type. Considering the total manpower involved in equipment maintenance, the per-unit maintenance cost is determined. This method allocates costs to individual pieces of equipment, thereby sidestepping the quantification hurdle created by varying types and quantities of monitoring equipment at each monitoring site due to various geological disaster types and magnitudes, and technical personnel’s maintenance responsibility for multiple equipment types in a single operation. Finally, incorporating regional adjustment coefficients, we have formulated theoretical costs for the operation and maintenance of automated monitoring and early-warning equipment for geological hazards. By contrasting theoretical costs with actual project budgets, the error margin is within 2%. Following nationwide consultation, these theoretical costs have been officially endorsed as the budget standard. These standards will lay the groundwork for project budgeting and review, facilitate efficient fund utilization, and ensure the financial sustainability of monitoring and warning systems for geological hazards. Concurrently, this paper bridges the global lack in budget norms for the operation and upkeep of automated geological disaster monitoring systems. The cost calculation model introduced serves as a pivotal reference globally for the evaluation of analogous system’s operations and maintenance expenses.

Suggested Citation

  • Gan Luo & Mingqi Tao & Baohe Wu & Mingzhi Zhang & Shuai Zhong & Junfeng Li & Xiaodi Yang, 2024. "Cost Estimation for the Operation and Maintenance of Automated Monitoring and Early-Warning Equipment for Geological Hazards," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-17, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10505-:d:1533427
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10505/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10505/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10505-:d:1533427. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.