IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i23p10441-d1532042.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Novel Framework for Estimation of the Maintenance and Operation Cost in Construction Projects: A Step Toward Sustainable Buildings

Author

Listed:
  • Maher Abuhussain

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering and Computing in Al-Qunfudhah, Umm al-Qura University, Mecca 24382, Saudi Arabia)

  • Ahmad Baghdadi

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering and Computing in Al-Qunfudhah, Umm al-Qura University, Mecca 24382, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Building maintenance and operation costs represent a significant portion of the life cycle costs (LCC) of construction projects. The accurate estimation of these costs is essential for ensuring the long-term sustainability and financial efficiency of buildings. This study aims to develop a novel framework for predicting maintenance and operation costs in construction projects by integrating an emotional artificial neural network (EANN). Unlike traditional models that rely on linear regression or static machine learning, the EANN dynamically adapts its learning through synthetic emotional feedback mechanisms and advanced optimization techniques. The research collected input data from 313 experts in the field of building management and construction in Ha’il, Saudi Arabia, through a comprehensive questionnaire. The integration of expert opinions with advanced machine learning techniques contributes to the innovative approach, providing more reliable and adaptive cost predictions. The proposed EANN model was then compared with a classic artificial neural network (ANN) model to evaluate its performance. The results indicate that the EANN model achieved an R 2 value of 0.85 in training and 0.81 in testing for buildings aged 0 to 10 years, significantly outperforming the ANN model, which achieved R 2 values of 0.78 and 0.72, respectively. Additionally, the Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) for the EANN model was 1.57 in training and 1.60 in testing, lower than the ANN’s RMSE values of 1.82 and 1.90. These findings show that the superior capability of the EANN model in estimating maintenance and operation costs.. This led to more accurate long-term maintenance cost projections, reduced budgeting uncertainty, and enhanced decision-making reliability for building managers.

Suggested Citation

  • Maher Abuhussain & Ahmad Baghdadi, 2024. "A Novel Framework for Estimation of the Maintenance and Operation Cost in Construction Projects: A Step Toward Sustainable Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-21, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10441-:d:1532042
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10441/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10441/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vafa Rostamiasl & Ahmad Jrade, 2024. "Integrating Building Information Modeling (BIM) and Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) to Evaluate the Economic Benefits of Designing Aging-In-Place Homes at the Conceptual Stage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-24, July.
    2. Ahsan Waqar & Abdul Hannan Qureshi & Wesam Salah Alaloul, 2023. "Barriers to Building Information Modeling (BIM) Deployment in Small Construction Projects: Malaysian Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-30, January.
    3. Mohammed H. Alshareef & Bassam M. Aljahdali & Ayman F. Alghanmi & Hussain T. Sulaimani, 2024. "Spatial Analysis and Risk Evaluation for Port Crisis Management Using Integrated Soft Computing and GIS-Based Models: A Case Study of Jazan Port, Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-24, June.
    4. Muhammad Altaf & Wesam Salah Alaloul & Muhammad Ali Musarat & Abdul Hannan Qureshi, 2023. "Life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) of construction projects: sustainability perspective," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(11), pages 12071-12118, November.
    5. José Torres Farinha & Hugo D. N. Raposo & José Edmundo de-Almeida-e-Pais & Mateus Mendes, 2023. "Physical Asset Life Cycle Evaluation Models—A Comparative Analysis towards Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-23, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Moshood, Taofeeq D. & Rotimi, James OB. & Shahzad, Wajiha & Bamgbade, J.A., 2024. "Infrastructure digital twin technology: A new paradigm for future construction industry," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    2. Ahsan Waqar & Idris Othman & Nasir Shafiq & Hasim Altan & Bertug Ozarisoy, 2023. "Modeling the Effect of Overcoming the Barriers to Passive Design Implementation on Project Sustainability Building Success: A Structural Equation Modeling Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-26, June.
    3. Wu Jing & Aidi Hizami Alias, 2024. "Key Factors for Building Information Modelling Implementation in the Context of Environmental, Social, and Governance and Sustainable Development Goals Integration: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-29, October.
    4. Yin Junjia & Aidi Hizami Alias & Nuzul Azam Haron & Nabilah Abu Bakar, 2023. "A Bibliometric Review on Safety Risk Assessment of Construction Based on CiteSpace Software and WoS Database," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-24, August.
    5. Maher Awad Abuhussain, 2024. "Integrated Fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution and Emotional Artificial Neural Network Model for Comprehensive Risk Prioritization in Green Construction Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-23, November.
    6. Ahsan Waqar & Idris Othman & Roberto Alonso González-Lezcano, 2023. "Challenges to the Implementation of BIM for the Risk Management of Oil and Gas Construction Projects: Structural Equation Modeling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-28, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10441-:d:1532042. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.