Author
Listed:
- Julio C. Gastañadui-Cruz
(Centro para Investigación en Recursos Sostenibles, Universidad Nacional de Trujillo, Trujillo 13011, Peru)
- Iván A. Reyes-Lopez
(Centro para Investigación en Recursos Sostenibles, Universidad Nacional de Trujillo, Trujillo 13011, Peru)
- Agusberto Cortijo-Garcia
(Centro para Investigación en Recursos Sostenibles, Universidad Nacional de Trujillo, Trujillo 13011, Peru)
- Hans R. Portilla-Rodriguez
(Centro para Investigación en Recursos Sostenibles, Universidad Nacional de Trujillo, Trujillo 13011, Peru)
- John A. Bush
(Colorado School of Mines, Center for Research in Sustainable Resources, Golden, CO 80401, USA)
- Johan Vanneste
(Colorado School of Mines, Center for Research in Sustainable Resources, Golden, CO 80401, USA)
- Pablo A. Garcia-Chevesich
(Colorado School of Mines, Center for Research in Sustainable Resources, Golden, CO 80401, USA
Intergovernmental Hydrological Programme, United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Montevideo 11800, Uruguay)
Abstract
The neutralization of high-density sludge (HDS) effluent is a required process involved in the treatment of acid mine drainage (AMD). In their last treatment stage, effluents with high pH values are acidified to reach legal standards before being released to the environment using hydrochloric or sulfuric acid. In this investigation, CO 2 was tested as an alternative way to decrease the pH of the HDS effluent, together with an economic analysis comparing the results with the use of strong mineral acids, considering a full-scale 300 m 3 /h plant. HDS samples were collected from a PAN American Silver operation in Cajamarca, northern Peru. Four acidification tests were carried out on 20 L containers, with a subsequent evaluation of reaction time and CO 2 consumption to regulate the final pH of the treated solution. The results suggest that by adding CO 2 (0.5 L/min) to the solution, the pH was successfully decreased from 10–10.5 to 6.5–7.5 (which falls within the legal limits) in a matter of minutes. An average of 130 g of CO 2 was sequestrated per m 3 of solution to decrease the pH within legal limits, representing around USD 0.031/m 3 in terms of treatment cost for a full-scale plant. While this is more expensive than using other acids, with a CO 2 credit of USD 100/ton, sequestrated CO 2 neutralization is 12% cheaper and only 6% more expensive than using H 2 SO 4 and HCl, respectively. Moreover, in terms of the costs per ton of avoided CO 2 of USD 133 and USD 262 for replacing hydrochloric and sulfuric acid, respectively, it is markedly lower than the cost of other CO 2 abatement technologies, like, for instance, solar photovoltaic panels (PV) that can cost between USD 368 and USD 684/ton of avoided CO 2 in Peru and require substantial capital investments. Moreover, the use of CO 2 implicates a series of additional safety, operational, and environmental advantages that should be considered. Therefore, the use of CO 2 to decrease HDS effluent’s pH should be further explored in Peru and elsewhere as a sustainable alternative.
Suggested Citation
Julio C. Gastañadui-Cruz & Iván A. Reyes-Lopez & Agusberto Cortijo-Garcia & Hans R. Portilla-Rodriguez & John A. Bush & Johan Vanneste & Pablo A. Garcia-Chevesich, 2024.
"Carbon Dioxide-Based Neutralization of High-Density Sludge Effluents as a Sustainable Climate and Water Quality Alternative to the Use of Strong Mineral Acids,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-14, November.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10363-:d:1530472
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10363-:d:1530472. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.