IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i23p10184-d1526221.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Screening Suitable Ecological Grasses and the Seeding Rate in the Muli Mining Area

Author

Listed:
  • Liangyu Lyu

    (College of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Sciences, Qinghai University, Xining 810016, China
    The author contributes equally to this work and is the co-first author of this paper.)

  • Qingqing Liu

    (College of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Sciences, Qinghai University, Xining 810016, China
    The author contributes equally to this work and is the co-first author of this paper.)

  • Miaohua He

    (College of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Sciences, Qinghai University, Xining 810016, China)

  • Pei Gao

    (College of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Sciences, Qinghai University, Xining 810016, China)

  • Zongcheng Cai

    (College of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, Qinghai University, Xining 810016, China)

  • Jianjun Shi

    (College of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Sciences, Qinghai University, Xining 810016, China)

Abstract

To target the lack of suitable grass species in the ecological restoration process of the Muli mining area, nine ecological grass species of Gramineae, Gentianaceae, Scrophulariaceae, and Ranunculaceae were selected as experimental materials to simulate the external alkaline environment for a seed germination test, which could be used to explore the response of seed germination to the environment. At the same time, Poa pratensis L. ‘Qinghai’, Deschampsia cespitosa , Koeleria cristata , and Elymus tangutorum were used as test materials to carry out a variety of comparison and screening tests of suitable seeding rates. The effects of the seeding rate on plant coverage, biomass, forage nutrients, and soil properties were analyzed by a variety of comparison and seeding rate tests. The results showed the following: (1) The relative germination rate of Koeleria cristata , Elymus tangutorum , Deschampsia cespitosa , and Poa pratensis L. ‘Qinghai’ was more than 70%, and the coverage in the returning green period was more than 60%, which was significantly higher than that of other treatments ( p < 0.05) and can better adapt to the environment of the Muli mining area compared to other grass species. Meanwhile, the adaptability of Pedicularis kansuensis , Gentiana macrophylla , and Aconitum pendulum was weak. (2) It was found that when the seeding rate was 9 g·m −2 , the biomass of Poa pratensis L. ‘Qinghai’, Deschampsia cespitos , and Koeleria cristata was the highest, which was 296.45 g·m −2 , 224.32 g·m −2 , and 236.35 g·m −2 , which was significantly higher than that of other treatments ( p < 0.05); the aboveground biomass was 356.24 g·m −2 when the seeding rate of Elymus tangutorum was 18 g·m −2 , which was significantly higher than that of other treatments ( p < 0.05). The membership function showed that the comprehensive evaluation value was 0.701, 0.576, 0.610, and 0.673 when the seeding rate of Poa pratensis L. ‘Qinghai’, Deschampsia cespitos , and Koeleria cristata was 9 g·m −2 and the seeding rate of Elymus tangutorum was 18 g·m −2 . To sum up, it is recommended that the four ecological grass species of Poa pratensis L. ‘Qinghai’, Deschampsia cespitosa , Koeleria cristata , and Elymus tangutorum can be used as the main grass species for ecological restoration in high-altitude and alpine areas such as the Muli mining area, which is affected by an alpine climate and fragile habitats. The optimum sowing rate of Poa pratensis L. ‘Qinghai’, Deschampsia cespitosa , and Koeleria cristata is 9 g·m −2 , and that of Elymus tangutorum is 18 g·m −2 . This cultivation method can effectively promote plant growth and development, improve the physicochemical properties of soil, and is conducive to improving the stability and sustainability of artificial grassland in alpine mining areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Liangyu Lyu & Qingqing Liu & Miaohua He & Pei Gao & Zongcheng Cai & Jianjun Shi, 2024. "Screening Suitable Ecological Grasses and the Seeding Rate in the Muli Mining Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-21, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10184-:d:1526221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10184/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10184/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10184-:d:1526221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.