IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i22p9894-d1520016.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biogas Production from a Solar-Heated Temperature-Controlled Biogas Digester

Author

Listed:
  • Francis Makamure

    (Physics Department, Faculty of Science & Agriculture, University of Fort Hare, Alice 5700, South Africa)

  • Patrick Mukumba

    (Physics Department, Faculty of Science & Agriculture, University of Fort Hare, Alice 5700, South Africa)

  • Golden Makaka

    (Physics Department, Faculty of Science & Agriculture, University of Fort Hare, Alice 5700, South Africa)

Abstract

This research paper explores biogas production in an underground temperature-controlled fixed dome digester and compares it with a similar uncontrolled digester. Two underground fixed-dome digesters, one fitted with a solar heating system and a stirrer and the other one with an identical stirrer only, were batch-fed with cow dung slurry collected from the University of Fort Hare farm and mixed with water in a ratio of 1:1. The solar heating system consisted of a solar geyser, pex-al-pex tubing, an electric ball valve, a water circulation pump, an Arduino aided temperature control system, and a heat exchanger located at the centre of the digester. Both the digesters were intermittently stirred for 10 min every 4 h. The digester without a heating system was used as a control. Biogas production in the two digesters was compared to assess the effect of solar heating on biogas production. The total solids, volatile solids, and the chemical oxygen demand of the cow dung used as substrate were determined before and after digestion. These were compared together with the cumulative biogas produced and the methane content for the controlled and uncontrolled digesters. It was observed that the temperature control system kept the slurry temperature in the controlled digester within the required range for 82.76% of the retention period, showing an efficiency of 82.76%. Some maximum temperature gradients of 7.0 °C were observed in both the controlled and uncontrolled digesters, showing that the stirrer speed of 30 rpm was not fast enough to create the needed vortex for a uniform mix in the slurry. It was further observed that the heat from the solar geyser and the ground insulation were sufficient to keep the digester temperature within the required temperature range without any additional heat source even at night. Biogas yield was observed to depend on the pH with a strong coefficient of determination of 0.788 and 0.755 for the controlled and uncontrolled digesters, respectively. The cumulative biogas was 26.77 m 3 and 18.05 m 3 for controlled and uncontrolled digesters, respectively, which was an increase of 33%. The methane content increased by 14% while carbon dioxide decreased by 10% from the uncontrolled to the controlled scenario. The percentage removal of the TS, VS, and COD was 66.26%, 76.81%, and 74.69%, respectively, compared to 47.01%, 60.37%, and 57.86% for the uncontrolled situation. Thus, the percentage removal of TS, VS, and COD increased by 19.25%, 16.44%, and 16.89%, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Francis Makamure & Patrick Mukumba & Golden Makaka, 2024. "Biogas Production from a Solar-Heated Temperature-Controlled Biogas Digester," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-31, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9894-:d:1520016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/9894/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/9894/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abdel daiem, Mahmoud M. & Hatata, Ahmed & Galal, Osama H. & Said, Noha & Ahmed, Dalia, 2021. "Prediction of biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of waste activated sludge and wheat straw using two-dimensional mathematical models and an artificial neural network," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 226-240.
    2. Oliver O. Apeh & Ochuko K. Overen & Edson L. Meyer, 2021. "Monthly, Seasonal and Yearly Assessments of Global Solar Radiation, Clearness Index and Diffuse Fractions in Alice, South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tosin Waidi Olofin & Omowunmi Mary Longe & Tien-Chien Jen, 2023. "Analysis of Performance Yield Parameters for Selected Polycrystalline Solar Panel Brands in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Ali Saleh Aziz & Mohammad Faridun Naim Tajuddin & Tekai Eddine Khalil Zidane & Chun-Lien Su & Abdullahi Abubakar Mas’ud & Mohammed J. Alwazzan & Ali Jawad Kadhim Alrubaie, 2022. "Design and Optimization of a Grid-Connected Solar Energy System: Study in Iraq," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-29, July.
    3. Ochuko Kelvin Overen & Edson Leroy Meyer, 2022. "Solar Energy Resources and Photovoltaic Power Potential of an Underutilised Region: A Case of Alice, South Africa," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-29, June.
    4. Oliver O. Apeh & Edson L. Meyer & Ochuko K. Overen, 2022. "Contributions of Solar Photovoltaic Systems to Environmental and Socioeconomic Aspects of National Development—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-28, August.
    5. Thi Thu Em Vo & Seung-Mo Je & Se-Hoon Jung & Jaehyeon Choi & Jun-Ho Huh & Han-Jong Ko, 2022. "Review of Photovoltaic Power and Aquaculture in Desert," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, April.
    6. Shi, Yi & Huang, Yidan & Xu, Jiuping, 2024. "A clean optimization approach for sustainable waste-to-energy using integrated technology," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    7. Abdel daiem, Mahmoud M. & Hatata, Ahmed & Said, Noha, 2022. "Modeling and optimization of semi-continuous anaerobic co-digestion of activated sludge and wheat straw using Nonlinear Autoregressive Exogenous neural network and seagull algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9894-:d:1520016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.