Author
Listed:
- Md. Hamidul Islam
(Department of Agriculture/Agricultural Regulations, University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff, Pine Bluff, AR 71601, USA
Department of Farm Power and Machinery, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh)
- Abdul Momin
(Agricultural Engineering Technology, School of Agriculture, Tennessee Tech University, Cooksville, TN 38505, USA)
- Chayan Kumer Saha
(Department of Farm Power and Machinery, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh)
- Md. Monjurul Alam
(Department of Farm Power and Machinery, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh)
- Shahidul Islam
(Department of Agriculture/Agricultural Regulations, University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff, Pine Bluff, AR 71601, USA)
Abstract
Postharvest food loss and waste offset worldwide agricultural productivity and food security. Insufficient drying and storage are the prominent drivers of food loss and waste in underdeveloped countries. Mechanical grain drying systems have distinct benefits over sun drying but are inaccessible to underserved communities due to high capital costs and energy demand. This study evaluated the techno-economic and financial performance of a half-ton-capacity BAU-STR dryer. The moisture extraction rate, drying rate, drying efficiency, and energy consumption were used as technical performance indicators. In contrast, the net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR), benefit–cost ratio (BCR), and payback period were considered economic performance indicators. The technical performance analysis results revealed that the moisture content of rice was reduced from 19.5% to 13.5 ± 0.15% in 4.0 h with an average drying rate of 1.5%/h and a drying efficiency of 75.1%. The financial performance analysis resulted in a drying cost, NPV, IRR, BCR, and PBP of USD 0.96 per 100 kg of grain, USD 3018, 135%, 3.0, and 0.73 yr., respectively, when the annual use was 240 h. If the yearly use of the dryer increased from 240 to 720 h, a higher NPV, IRR, and BCR, as well as a lower payback period and drying cost, could be achieved. Adopting a BAU-STR dryer for drying grain (rice and corn) among underserved communities could play a key role in postharvest food loss and waste.
Suggested Citation
Md. Hamidul Islam & Abdul Momin & Chayan Kumer Saha & Md. Monjurul Alam & Shahidul Islam, 2024.
"Techno-Economic Analysis of BAU-STR Dryer for Rice Drying: An Approach to Accelerate Adoption,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-16, November.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9846-:d:1518964
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9846-:d:1518964. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.