Author
Listed:
- Abeer Albalawneh
(The National Agricultural Research Center (NARC), Amman 19381, Jordan
Center on Agrarian Reform and Rural Development for Near East (CARDNE), Amman 11185, Jordan)
- Heba Hasan
(The National Agricultural Research Center (NARC), Amman 19381, Jordan
Center on Agrarian Reform and Rural Development for Near East (CARDNE), Amman 11185, Jordan)
- Sami Faisal Alarsan
(The National Agricultural Research Center (NARC), Amman 19381, Jordan)
- Mai Diab
(The National Agricultural Research Center (NARC), Amman 19381, Jordan
Center on Agrarian Reform and Rural Development for Near East (CARDNE), Amman 11185, Jordan)
- Saja Abu Znaimah
(Center on Agrarian Reform and Rural Development for Near East (CARDNE), Amman 11185, Jordan)
- Amer Sweity
(The National Agricultural Research Center (NARC), Amman 19381, Jordan)
- Majdy Mohmad Aladwan
(The National Agricultural Research Center (NARC), Amman 19381, Jordan)
- Bilal Sharman
(The National Agricultural Research Center (NARC), Amman 19381, Jordan)
- Ahmad Mohammed Alalwan
(The National Agricultural Research Center (NARC), Amman 19381, Jordan)
- Yazan AlBalawnah
(The National Agricultural Research Center (NARC), Amman 19381, Jordan)
- Musa Abu Dayyeh
(The National Agricultural Research Center (NARC), Amman 19381, Jordan)
- Ehab Alnaimat
(The National Agricultural Research Center (NARC), Amman 19381, Jordan)
Abstract
Background: The black soldier fly ( Hermetia illucens ) has emerged as a promising tool in sustainable waste management, owing to its larvae’s ability to efficiently convert organic waste into valuable biomass. Objective: This study investigates the impact of various substrate compositions on the growth, waste reduction efficiency, and bioconversion rate of black soldier fly (BSF) larvae ( Hermetia illucens ). The aim is to optimize feeding strategies to enhance the effectiveness of BSF larvae in sustainable waste management and protein production. Methods: A controlled experiment was conducted over a 20-day period, using four different substrate types: 100% sludge, 75% sludge + 25% chicken feed, 25% sludge + 75% chicken feed, and 100% chicken feed. Each treatment had three replicates with 100 larvae each. Larval growth metrics, including weight and width, were recorded bi-daily. The waste reduction efficiency and bioconversion rate were calculated based on the remaining substrate weight and larval biomass, respectively. Elemental analysis was performed to determine the impact of substrate type on the accumulation of various elements in the larvae. Results: Significant differences were observed in larval growth, waste reduction efficiency, and bioconversion rates across the different substrates. The 100% chicken feed substrate led to the highest larval growth (M = 0.0881 g/day, SD = 0.0042) and bioconversion rate (M = 7.52%, SD = 0.34), while the 100% sludge substrate achieved the highest waste reduction rate (M = 86.2%, SD = 2.15). ANOVA tests indicated that substrate composition significantly affected these outcomes ( p < 0.05). Elemental analysis showed substantial variations in the concentrations of calcium, cadmium, and nickel among the substrates, with the 100% sludge substrate having the highest nickel accumulation (M = 0.2763 ppm, SD = 0.023), significantly different from the other treatments ( p < 0.001). Conclusions: The results demonstrate that substrate composition is crucial for optimizing BSF larvae growth and waste reduction efficiency. Nutrient-rich substrates, such as chicken feed, significantly enhance bioconversion rates and larval biomass production, although careful consideration of elemental accumulation, especially heavy metals, is essential for safe application in animal feed.
Suggested Citation
Abeer Albalawneh & Heba Hasan & Sami Faisal Alarsan & Mai Diab & Saja Abu Znaimah & Amer Sweity & Majdy Mohmad Aladwan & Bilal Sharman & Ahmad Mohammed Alalwan & Yazan AlBalawnah & Musa Abu Dayyeh & E, 2024.
"Evaluating the Influence of Nutrient-Rich Substrates on the Growth and Waste Reduction Efficiency of Black Soldier Fly Larvae,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-16, November.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9730-:d:1516595
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9730-:d:1516595. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.