IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i22p9704-d1516093.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Spatial Differentiation in Cultural Urban Land Use in China’s Ancient and Emerging Cities: A Comparative Case Study of Xi’an and Shenzhen

Author

Listed:
  • Ziliang Zhao

    (College of Architecture, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Yanta Road 13, Xi’an 710055, China
    China Academy of Urban-Rural Development & Cultural Heritage, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Yanta Road 13, Xi’an 710055, China)

  • Xiaolong Li

    (College of Architecture, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Yanta Road 13, Xi’an 710055, China
    China Academy of Urban-Rural Development & Cultural Heritage, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Yanta Road 13, Xi’an 710055, China)

  • Yaya Liu

    (College of Architecture, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Yanta Road 13, Xi’an 710055, China
    China Academy of Urban-Rural Development & Cultural Heritage, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Yanta Road 13, Xi’an 710055, China)

  • Lingfan Yang

    (China Academy of Urban-Rural Development & Cultural Heritage, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Yanta Road 13, Xi’an 710055, China)

  • Meng Liu

    (Shaanxi Institute of Urban & Rural Planning and Design, Xintai South Street 1418, Xi’an 710021, China)

Abstract

With the rapid urbanization of China in recent years, urban development has entered a new stage that focuses on improving the quality of growth. During this process, the excessive emphasis on economic growth and the neglect of spiritual and cultural aspects have led to various issues, such as cultural homogenization and urban identity crises. This study examined the development patterns behind this phenomenon by focusing on land specifically designated for urban cultural functions. Through the lens of cultural urban land use (CULU), a comparative study was conducted between the ancient city of Xi’an and the emerging city of Shenzhen. The study collected and processed point of interest (POI) and area of interest (AOI) data from both Xi’an and Shenzhen and analyzed the spatial characteristics of CULU using quantitative statistical methods. The analysis revealed multidimensional differentiation between the two cities in terms of value characteristics, historical characteristics, functional characteristics, and social consensus characteristics. Furthermore, the study applied the Spatial Circle Layer model (SCL) to analyze the spatial distribution differences in these characteristics between Xi’an and Shenzhen and identified key factors influencing these characteristics, such as the “formation and spatial distribution of key CULU” and the “historical continuity of urban space”. These findings were synthesized into the “anchoring–layering mechanism”. Our research explores why land designated for urban cultural functions exhibits different patterns in different cities, providing effective theoretical support for the planning and construction of such land in future urban development.

Suggested Citation

  • Ziliang Zhao & Xiaolong Li & Yaya Liu & Lingfan Yang & Meng Liu, 2024. "Exploring Spatial Differentiation in Cultural Urban Land Use in China’s Ancient and Emerging Cities: A Comparative Case Study of Xi’an and Shenzhen," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-22, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9704-:d:1516093
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/9704/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/9704/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shujing Dong & Danjie Shen, 2023. "A Study of Historical Urban Landscape Layering in Luoyang Based on Historical Map Translation," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Na Xiu & Maria Ignatieva & Cecil Konijnendijk van den Bosch, 2019. "Historical perspectives on green structure development: the examples of Stockholm, Sweden and Xi’an, China," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(8), pages 1050-1063, November.
    3. Jose Lobo & Luis MA Bettencourt & Michael E Smith & Scott Ortman, 2020. "Settlement scaling theory: Bridging the study of ancient and contemporary urban systems," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(4), pages 731-747, March.
    4. Hao Lei & Youmei Zhou, 2022. "Conducting Heritage Tourism-Led Urban Renewal in Chinese Historical and Cultural Urban Spaces: A Case Study of Datong," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-23, November.
    5. Chong Wu & Mengling Yang & Hang Zhang & Yafang Yu, 2023. "Spatial Structure and Evolution of Territorial Function of Rural Areas at Cultural Heritage Sites from the Perspective of Social Space," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-22, May.
    6. Lingfan Yang & Xiaolong Luo & Ziyao Ding & Xiaoman Liu & Zongni Gu, 2022. "Restructuring for Growth in Development Zones, China: A Systematic Literature and Policy Review (1984–2022)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-32, June.
    7. Francesca Nocca, 2017. "The Role of Cultural Heritage in Sustainable Development: Multidimensional Indicators as Decision-Making Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-28, October.
    8. Hongpeng Fu & Jiao Liu & Xiaotian Dong & Zhenlin Chen & Min He, 2024. "Evaluating the Sustainable Development Goals within Spatial Planning for Decision-Making: A Major Function-Oriented Zone Planning Strategy in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-22, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alessio D’Auria & Pasquale De Toro & Nicola Fierro & Elisa Montone, 2018. "Integration between GIS and Multi-Criteria Analysis for Ecosystem Services Assessment: A Methodological Proposal for the National Park of Cilento, Vallo di Diano and Alburni (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-25, September.
    2. Carlos Smaniotto Costa & Marluci Menezes & Petja Ivanova-Radovanova & Tatiana Ruchinskaya & Konstantinos Lalenis & Monica Bocci, 2021. "Planning Perspectives and Approaches for Activating Underground Built Heritage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-15, September.
    3. Scott G Ortman & José Lobo & Michael E Smith, 2020. "Cities: Complexity, theory and history," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(12), pages 1-24, December.
    4. Daan Francois Toerien, 2022. "Linking Entrepreneurial Activities and Community Prosperity/Poverty in United States Counties: Use of the Enterprise Dependency Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, February.
    5. Joris Van Doorsselaere, 2021. "Connecting Sustainable Development and Heritage Education? An Analysis of the Curriculum Reform in Flemish Public Secondary Schools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    6. Elena Gorbenkova & Elena Shcherbina, 2020. "Historical-Genetic Features in Rural Settlement System: A Case Study from Mogilev District (Mogilev Oblast, Belarus)," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-17, May.
    7. Shen Wang & Guohe Huang & Yurui Fan, 2018. "A Multistage Distribution-Generation Planning Model for Clean Power Generation under Multiple Uncertainties—A Case Study of Urumqi, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-30, September.
    8. Andrew J. Stier & Sina Sajjadi & Fariba Karimi & Luís M. A. Bettencourt & Marc G. Berman, 2024. "Implicit racial biases are lower in more populous more diverse and less segregated US cities," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, December.
    9. Dana Badau & Adela Badau, 2018. "The motric, Educational, Recreational and Satisfaction Impact of Adventure Education Activities in the Urban Tourism Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-13, June.
    10. Tomas Kačerauskas & Dalia Streimikiene & Rasa Bartkute, 2021. "Environmental Sustainability of Creative Economy: Evidence from a Lithuanian Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, August.
    11. Mingyue Yang & Ningyin Liu & Xinjing Wang & Yan Zhang, 2023. "Chinese cities exhibit diverse allometric growth patterns in material metabolism," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(6), pages 1626-1638, December.
    12. Stefania Środa-Murawska & Elżbieta Grzelak-Kostulska & Jadwiga Biegańska & Leszek S. Dąbrowski, 2021. "Culture and Sustainable Tourism: Does the Pair Pay in Medium-Sized Cities?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-26, August.
    13. Goran Skataric & Velibor Spalevic & Svetislav Popovic & Nenad Perosevic & Rajko Novicevic, 2021. "The Vernacular and Rural Houses of Agrarian Areas in the Zeta Region, Montenegro," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-35, July.
    14. Qingsong He & Lingping Huang & Jing Li, 2022. "Rediscovering the Scaling Law of Urban Land from a Multi-Scale Perspective—A Case Study of Wuhan," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, June.
    15. Daniela Angelina Jelinčić, 2021. "Indicators for Cultural and Creative Industries’ Impact Assessment on Cultural Heritage and Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-13, July.
    16. Rocío González-Sánchez & Sara Alonso-Muñoz & María-Sonia Medina-Salgado & María Torrejón-Ramos, 2023. "Driving circular tourism pathways in the post-pandemic period: a research roadmap," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 17(3), pages 633-668, September.
    17. Li, Zekun & Chen, Zhenhua, 2023. "Predicting the future development scale of high-speed rail through the urban scaling law," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    18. Sanober Naheed & Salman Shooshtarian, 2022. "The Role of Cultural Heritage in Promoting Urban Sustainability: A Brief Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, September.
    19. Andris Kairiss & Ineta Geipele & Irina Olevska-Kairisa, 2023. "Sustainability of Cultural Heritage-Related Projects: Use of Socio-Economic Indicators in Latvia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-29, June.
    20. Liu, Ningyin & Zhang, Yan & Fath, Brian D., 2021. "The material metabolism characteristics and growth patterns of the central cities of China's Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 448(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9704-:d:1516093. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.