IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i22p9653-d1515005.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bridging Perceptual Gaps: Designers vs. Non-Designers in Urban Wayfinding Signage Preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Jialu Zhou

    (Faculty of Design and Architecture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia)

  • Norsidah Ujang

    (Faculty of Design and Architecture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia)

  • Mohd Shahrudin Abd Manan

    (Faculty of Design and Architecture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia)

  • Faziawati Abdul Aziz

    (Faculty of Design and Architecture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia)

Abstract

As urban environments become increasingly complex and the costs and challenges of infrastructure upgrades continue to rise, wayfinding signage has become an effective solution to cope with urban dynamics due to its low cost and high flexibility. Although the functionality of wayfinding signage has been extensively studied, the perceptual differences between designers and non-designers have not been adequately explored. Ignoring these differences may lead to the overlooking of users’ real and diverse needs, resulting in suboptimal signage performance in practical applications and ultimately a reduction in the overall functionality and user experience of urban spaces. This study aims to bridge this perceptual gap. For this study, we conducted a questionnaire survey in China to compare the visual preferences of designers and non-designers regarding text, shape, color coding, and patterns. The results indicate that designers prioritize functionality and clarity to ensure the effective use of signage in complex urban environments, whereas non-designers prefer wayfinding signages that reflect local cultural symbols and characteristics. Our conclusions suggest that the public’s expectations for wayfinding signage extend beyond basic navigational functions, with an emphasis on cultural expression and visual appeal. Understanding these perceptual differences is crucial in developing design strategies that balance functionality, esthetics, and sustainability, thereby facilitating the sustainable integration of signage into urban landscapes.

Suggested Citation

  • Jialu Zhou & Norsidah Ujang & Mohd Shahrudin Abd Manan & Faziawati Abdul Aziz, 2024. "Bridging Perceptual Gaps: Designers vs. Non-Designers in Urban Wayfinding Signage Preferences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-21, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9653-:d:1515005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/9653/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/9653/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Justin B. Hollander & Ann Sussman & Peter Lowitt & Neil Angus & Minyu Situ & Aliya Magnuson, 2023. "Insights into wayfinding: urban design exploration through the use of algorithmic eye-tracking software," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 274-295, May.
    2. Yuqi Shi & Yi Zhang & Tao Wang & Chaoyang Li & Shengqiang Yuan, 2020. "The Effects of Ambient Illumination, Color Combination, Sign Height, and Observation Angle on the Legibility of Wayfinding Signs in Metro Stations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Paul Symonds & David H.K. Brown & Valeria Lo Iacono, 2017. "Exploring an Absent Presence: Wayfinding as an Embodied Sociocultural Experience," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 22(1), pages 48-67, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ammar Al-Sharaa & Mastura Adam & Amer Siddiq Amer Nordin & Riyadh Mundher & Ameer Alhasan, 2022. "Assessment of Wayfinding Performance in Complex Healthcare Facilities: A Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Liang Sun & Yao Xu & Sijing Teng & Bo Wang & Ming Li & Shanmin Ding, 2022. "Research into the Visual Saliency of Guide Signs in an Underground Commercial Street Based on an Eye-Movement Experiment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-23, December.
    3. Wenying Zhang & Lian Zhu & Zixuan Zhang & Zhan Zhang & Linjun Lu, 2020. "A Sustainable Evaluation Method for a Tourism Public Wayfinding System: A Case Study of Shanghai Disneyland Resort," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Reza Askarizad & Jinliao He & Elham Mehrinejad Khotbehsara, 2022. "The Legibility Efficacy of Historical Neighborhoods in Creating a Cognitive Map for Citizens," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-20, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9653-:d:1515005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.