IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i21p9194-d1504850.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does the Bike-Sharing Platform Share Its Own Private Information or Not in a Reverse Supply Chain?

Author

Listed:
  • Rufeng Wang

    (Business School, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471023, China)

  • Yupei Du

    (Business School, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471023, China)

  • Yurun Wei

    (Business School, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471023, China)

Abstract

Bike sharing facilitates the public’s daily lives and possesses substantial market demand, yet its overwhelming presence has triggered some environmental problems. To enhance resource utilization efficiency, we examine the decision-making strategies within a reverse supply chain considering the private information of the bike-sharing platform. Using Stackelberg games, two models are formulated in order to investigate whether the platform should share its own private information when the used shared bikes are recycled. A supply chain without private information is provided as a benchmark for comparison, and we obtain the optimal equilibrium strategies of the benchmark and the proposed model. Furthermore, how the optimal strategies change with the variation in parameters and the impacts of the private information on the optimal strategies are discussed. The results show that information asymmetry could lead to a reduction in supply chain efficiency. Thus, a two-part pricing contract is introduced to incentivize the platform to share information and coordinate the supply chain, which can effectively improve the performance of the integral supply chain and implement a “win-win” strategy for the third-party remanufacturer and the platform.

Suggested Citation

  • Rufeng Wang & Yupei Du & Yurun Wei, 2024. "Does the Bike-Sharing Platform Share Its Own Private Information or Not in a Reverse Supply Chain?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-28, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:21:p:9194-:d:1504850
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/21/9194/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/21/9194/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mahadevan, B. & Hazra, Jishnu & Jain, Tarun, 2017. "Services outsourcing under asymmetric cost information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(2), pages 456-467.
    2. Weraikat, Dua & Zanjani, Masoumeh Kazemi & Lehoux, Nadia, 2016. "Two-echelon pharmaceutical reverse supply chain coordination with customers incentives," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 41-52.
    3. Esmaeili, M. & Zeephongsekul, P., 2010. "Seller-buyer models of supply chain management with an asymmetric information structure," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(1), pages 146-154, January.
    4. Amy Z. Zeng, 2013. "Coordination mechanisms for a three‐stage reverse supply chain to increase profitable returns," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(1), pages 31-45, February.
    5. Jianteng Xu & Peng Wang & Qi Xu, 2022. "Impact of Information Asymmetry on the Operation of Green Closed-Loop Supply Chain under Government Regulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-18, June.
    6. Choi, Tsan-Ming & Li, Yongjian & Xu, Lei, 2013. "Channel leadership, performance and coordination in closed loop supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 371-380.
    7. Teunter, Ruud H. & Flapper, Simme Douwe P., 2011. "Optimal core acquisition and remanufacturing policies under uncertain core quality fractions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 210(2), pages 241-248, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zeng, Amy Z. & Hou, Jing, 2019. "Procurement and coordination under imperfect quality and uncertain demand in reverse mobile phone supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 346-359.
    2. Suvadarshini, Pinakhi & Biswas, Indranil & Srivastava, Samir K., 2023. "Impact of reverse channel competition, individual rationality, and information asymmetry on multi-channel closed-loop supply chain design," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    3. Bo Wang & Ning Wang, 2022. "Decision Models for a Dual-Recycling Channel Reverse Supply Chain with Consumer Strategic Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-18, August.
    4. Emad Sane Zerang & Ata Allah Taleizadeh & Jafar Razmi, 2018. "Analytical comparisons in a three-echelon closed-loop supply chain with price and marketing effort-dependent demand: game theory approaches," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 451-478, February.
    5. Matsui, Kenji, 2022. "Optimal timing of acquisition price announcement for used products in a dual-recycling channel reverse supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(2), pages 615-632.
    6. Wu, Cheng-Han & Kao, Yi-Jhe, 2018. "Cooperation regarding technology development in a closed-loop supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(2), pages 523-539.
    7. Sarkar, Sumit & Bhala, Shrey, 2021. "Coordinating a closed loop supply chain with fairness concern by a constant wholesale price contract," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(1), pages 140-156.
    8. Ehsan Shekarian & Simme Douwe Flapper, 2021. "Analyzing the Structure of Closed-Loop Supply Chains: A Game Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-32, January.
    9. Xiaoying Li & Qinghua Zhu, 2020. "Contract Design for Enhancing Green Food Material Production Effort with Asymmetric Supply Cost Information," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, March.
    10. Min Huang & Pengxing Yi & TieLin Shi, 2017. "Triple Recycling Channel Strategies for Remanufacturing of Construction Machinery in a Retailer-Dominated Closed-Loop Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-19, December.
    11. Hu, Shu & Dai, Ying & Ma, Zu-Jun & Ye, Yu-Sen, 2016. "Designing contracts for a reverse supply chain with strategic recycling behavior of consumers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 16-24.
    12. Anna Nagurney & Dong Li, 2014. "Equilibria and dynamics of supply chain network competition with information asymmetry in quality and minimum quality standards," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 285-315, July.
    13. Siao-Leu Phouratsamay & Safia Kedad-Sidhoum & Fanny Pascual, 2021. "Coordination of a two-level supply chain with contracts," 4OR, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 235-264, June.
    14. Liu, Wenjie & Liu, Wei & Shen, Ningning & Xu, Zhitao & Xie, Naiming & Chen, Jian & Zhou, Huiyu, 2022. "Pricing and collection decisions of a closed-loop supply chain with fuzzy demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    15. Ni Du & Qinglan Han, 2018. "Pricing and Service Quality Guarantee Decisions in Logistics Service Supply Chain with Fairness Concern," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 35(05), pages 1-41, October.
    16. Choi, Tsan-Ming & Chow, Pui-Sze & Lee, Chang Hwan & Shen, Bin, 2018. "Used intimate apparel collection programs: A game-theoretic analytical study," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 44-62.
    17. Gong, Hailei & Zhang, Zhi-Hai, 2022. "Benders decomposition for the distributionally robust optimization of pricing and reverse logistics network design in remanufacturing systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(2), pages 496-510.
    18. Shizhen Bai & Ling Ge & Xuelian Zhang, 2022. "Platform or direct channel: government-subsidized recycling strategies for WEEE," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 347-369, June.
    19. Emad Sane-Zerang & Jafar Razmi & Ata Allah Taleizadeh, 2020. "Coordination in a closed-loop supply chain under asymmetric and symmetric information with sales effort-dependent demand," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 90(2), pages 303-334, March.
    20. Xiao, Tiaojun & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Cheng, T.C.E., 2014. "Product variety and channel structure strategy for a retailer-Stackelberg supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(1), pages 114-124.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:21:p:9194-:d:1504850. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.