IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i20p8956-d1499947.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization of a Biomass-Based Power and Fresh Water-Generation System by Machine Learning Using Thermoeconomic Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Fatemeh Parnian Gharamaleki

    (Faculty of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz 16471, Iran)

  • Shayan Sharafi Laleh

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz 16471, Iran)

  • Nima Ghasemzadeh

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz 16471, Iran)

  • Saeed Soltani

    (Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Antalya Bilim University, 07190 Antalya, Turkey)

  • Marc A. Rosen

    (Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, ON L1G 0C5, Canada)

Abstract

Biomass is a viable and accessible source of energy that can help address the problem of energy shortages in rural and remote areas. Another important issue for societies today is the lack of clean water, especially in places with high populations and low rainfall. To address both of these concerns, a sustainable biomass-fueled power cycle integrated with a double-stage reverse osmosis water-desalination unit has been designed. The double-stage reverse osmosis system is provided by the 20% of generated power from the bottoming cycles and this allocation can be altered based on the needs for freshwater or power. This system is assessed from energy, exergy, thermoeconomic, and environmental perspectives, and two distinct multi-objective optimization scenarios are applied featuring various objective functions. The considered parameters for this assessment are gas turbine inlet temperature, compressor’s pressure ratio, and cold end temperature differences in heat exchangers 2 and 3. In the first optimization scenario, considering the pollution index, the total unit cost of exergy products, and exergy efficiency as objective functions, the optimal values are, respectively, identified as 0.7644 kg/kWh, 32.7 USD/GJ, and 44%. Conversely, in the second optimization scenario, featuring the emission index, total unit cost of exergy products, and output net power as objective functions, the optimal values are 0.7684 kg/kWh, 27.82 USD/GJ, and 2615.9 kW.

Suggested Citation

  • Fatemeh Parnian Gharamaleki & Shayan Sharafi Laleh & Nima Ghasemzadeh & Saeed Soltani & Marc A. Rosen, 2024. "Optimization of a Biomass-Based Power and Fresh Water-Generation System by Machine Learning Using Thermoeconomic Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-24, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:8956-:d:1499947
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8956/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8956/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Akan, Taner, 2023. "Can renewable energy mitigate the impacts of inflation and policy interest on climate change?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 255-289.
    2. Blanco-Marigorta, Ana M. & Masi, Marco & Manfrida, Giampaolo, 2014. "Exergo-environmental analysis of a reverse osmosis desalination plant in Gran Canaria," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 223-232.
    3. Roy, Dibyendu, 2023. "Multi-objective optimization of biomass gasification based combined heat and power system employing molten carbonate fuel cell and externally fired gas turbine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    4. Kocak, Emrah & Ulug, Eyup Emre & Oralhan, Burcu, 2023. "The impact of electricity from renewable and non-renewable sources on energy poverty and greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs): Empirical evidence and policy implications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    5. Ioannidis, Filippos & Kosmidou, Kyriaki & Papanastasiou, Dimitra, 2023. "Public awareness of renewable energy sources and Circular Economy in Greece," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1086-1096.
    6. Song, Jian & Wang, Yaxiong & Wang, Kai & Wang, Jiangfeng & Markides, Christos N., 2021. "Combined supercritical CO2 (SCO2) cycle and organic Rankine cycle (ORC) system for hybrid solar and geothermal power generation: Thermoeconomic assessment of various configurations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 1020-1035.
    7. Esily, Rehab R. & Yuanying, Chi & Ibrahiem, Dalia M. & Houssam, Nourhane & Makled, Randa A. & Chen, Yahui, 2023. "Environmental benefits of energy poverty alleviation, renewable resources, and urbanization in North Africa," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    8. Verma, Shivpal & Dregulo, Andrei Mikhailovich & Kumar, Vinay & Bhargava, Preeti Chaturvedi & Khan, Nawaz & Singh, Anuradha & Sun, Xinwei & Sindhu, Raveendran & Binod, Parameswaran & Zhang, Zengqiang &, 2023. "Reaction engineering during biomass gasification and conversion to energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    9. Gul, Eid & Baldinelli, Giorgio & Bartocci, Pietro & Shamim, Tariq & Domenighini, Piergiovanni & Cotana, Franco & Wang, Jinwen & Fantozzi, Francesco & Bianchi, Francesco, 2023. "Transition toward net zero emissions - Integration and optimization of renewable energy sources: Solar, hydro, and biomass with the local grid station in central Italy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 672-686.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Seyed Mohammad Seyed Mahmoudi & Ramin Ghiami Sardroud & Mohsen Sadeghi & Marc A. Rosen, 2022. "Integration of Supercritical CO 2 Recompression Brayton Cycle with Organic Rankine/Flash and Kalina Cycles: Thermoeconomic Comparison," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-29, July.
    2. Alvin Henao & Luceny Guzman, 2024. "Exploration of Alternatives to Reduce the Gap in Access to Electricity in Rural Communities—Las Nubes Village Case (Barranquilla, Colombia)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Ayman Abdul Karim Alhijazi & Radwan A. Almasri & Ahmad Firas Alloush, 2023. "A Hybrid Renewable Energy (Solar/Wind/Biomass) and Multi-Use System Principles, Types, and Applications: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-24, December.
    4. Cao, Yan & Dhahad, Hayder A. & Alsharif, Sameer & Sharma, Kamal & El.Shafy, Asem Saleh & Farhang, Babak & Mohammed, Adil Hussein, 2022. "Multi-objective optimizations and exergoeconomic analyses of a high-efficient bi-evaporator multigeneration system with freshwater unit," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 699-714.
    5. Zhang, Zhihao, 2023. "Are climate risks helpful for understanding inflation in BRICS countries?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PB).
    6. Ding, Qian & Huang, Jianbai & Chen, Jinyu & Tao, Dali, 2023. "Internet development and renewable energy technological innovation: Does institutional quality matter?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    7. Yang, Zhaofu & Liu, Hong & Yuan, Yongna & Li, Muhua, 2024. "Can renewable energy development facilitate China's sustainable energy transition? Perspective from Energy Trilemma," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    8. Wang, Gang & Zhang, Zhen & Lin, Jianqing, 2024. "Multi-energy complementary power systems based on solar energy: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    9. Iwona Bąk & Katarzyna Wawrzyniak & Maciej Oesterreich, 2024. "Assessment of Impact of Use of Renewable Energy Sources on Level of Energy Poverty in EU Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-22, December.
    10. Xie, Yingchun & Nie, Yutai & Li, Tailu & Zhang, Yao & Wang, Jingyi, 2023. "Flash evaporation strategy of organic Rankine cycle for geothermal power performance enhancement: A case study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 57-69.
    11. Wang, Shukun & Li, Ke & Yu, Wei & Liu, Chao & Guan, Zhengjun, 2024. "Effects of non-condensable gas on thermodynamic performance of transcritical organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    12. Guo, Jiangfeng & Song, Jian & Han, Zengxiao & Pervunin, Konstantin S. & Markides, Christos N., 2022. "Investigation of the thermohydraulic characteristics of vertical supercritical CO2 flows at cooling conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    13. Chunhong Liu & Shisong Jiang & Hanfei Zhang & Ziyi Lu & Umberto Desideri, 2024. "China and Italy’s Energy Development Trajectories: Current Landscapes and Future Cooperation Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-18, February.
    14. Mariano Alarcón & Juan-Pedro Luna-Abad & Manuel Seco-Nicolás & Imane Moulefera & Gloria Víllora, 2024. "Study of Ionanofluids Behavior in PVT Solar Collectors: Determination of Thermal Fields and Characteristic Length by Means of HEATT ® Platform," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-18, November.
    15. Keçebaş, Ali, 2016. "Exergoenvironmental analysis for a geothermal district heating system: An application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 391-400.
    16. Saravana Kumar Tamilarasan & Jobel Jose & Vignesh Boopalan & Fei Chen & Senthil Kumar Arumugam & Jishnu Chandran Ramachandran & Rajesh Kanna Parthasarathy & Dawid Taler & Tomasz Sobota & Jan Taler, 2024. "Recent Developments in Supercritical CO 2 -Based Sustainable Power Generation Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-29, August.
    17. Huang, Yue & Zhu, Lin & He, Yangdong & Wang, Yuan & Hao, Qiang & Zhu, Yifei, 2023. "Carbon dioxide utilization based on exergoenvironmental sustainability assessment: A case study of CO2 hydrogenation to methanol," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    18. Blanco-Marigorta, A.M. & Lozano-Medina, A. & Marcos, J.D., 2017. "A critical review of definitions for exergetic efficiency in reverse osmosis desalination plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 752-760.
    19. Fabio Fatigati & Roberto Cipollone, 2024. "Development of Dual Intake Port Technology in ORC-Based Power Unit Driven by Solar-Assisted Reservoir," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-19, February.
    20. Valentyna Kukharets & Rasa Čingiene & Dalia Juočiūnienė & Savelii Kukharets & Egidijus Blažauskas & Szymon Szufa & Andrii Muzychenko & Svitlana Beleі & Nazar Lahodyn & Taras Hutsol, 2024. "Regression Analysis of the Impact of Foreign Direct Investments, Adjusted Net Savings, and Environmental Tax Revenues on the Consumption of Renewable Energy Sources in EU Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-14, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:8956-:d:1499947. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.