IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i20p8953-d1499880.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigation of Trip Decisions for an Earthquake: A Case Study in Elazığ, Türkiye

Author

Listed:
  • Ayşe Polat

    (Transportation Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul 34469, Türkiye
    Department of Transportation Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Yalova University, Yalova 77200, Türkiye)

  • Hüseyin Onur Tezcan

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul 34469, Türkiye)

Abstract

Following an earthquake, abnormal travel demand causes traffic congestion and poses significant problems for relief efforts. Research on post-earthquake travel demand is essential for disaster management. An effective disaster management strategy ensures achieving sustainable development goals. This study focused on this critical period and analyzed post-earthquake trip decisions. The city of Elazığ, a region not at risk of tsunami, was used as a case study. A 6.8 magnitude earthquake hit Elazığ in January 2020. After the earthquake, data from 2739 individuals were collected by a household survey conducted face-to-face. The data were segregated into two categories, depending on the earthquake’s intensity. The study used a binary logit model to examine the potential factors of trip decisions after an earthquake. The results showed that 75% of participants made at least one trip within 24 h after the earthquake. It was observed that household, building-and disaster-related attributes influence earthquake survivors’ trip decisions. The initial location at the time of the earthquake was the most significant factor affecting trip decisions. It was also found that individuals who experienced the earthquake outside their homes in both datasets were more likely to make a trip. Additionally, the dataset with higher earthquake intensity had more significant variables affecting the trip decision.

Suggested Citation

  • Ayşe Polat & Hüseyin Onur Tezcan, 2024. "Investigation of Trip Decisions for an Earthquake: A Case Study in Elazığ, Türkiye," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-20, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:8953-:d:1499880
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8953/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8953/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ming‐Chou Ho & Daigee Shaw & Shuyeu Lin & Yao‐Chu Chiu, 2008. "How Do Disaster Characteristics Influence Risk Perception?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(3), pages 635-643, June.
    2. Stephen D. Wong & Jacquelyn C. Broader & Joan L. Walker & Susan A. Shaheen, 2023. "Understanding California wildfire evacuee behavior and joint choice making," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 1165-1211, August.
    3. Adam Pel & Michiel Bliemer & Serge Hoogendoorn, 2012. "A review on travel behaviour modelling in dynamic traffic simulation models for evacuations," Transportation, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 97-123, January.
    4. Fatemeh Mohajeri & Babak Mirbaha, 2021. "Studying the Role of Behavioral Characteristics in Individuals Travel Choice Behavior in Response to Earthquake Disaster Using Discrete Choice Models," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-17, September.
    5. Mustafa Anil Yazici & Kaan Ozbay, 2008. "Evacuation Modelling in the United States: Does the Demand Model Choice Matter?," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(6), pages 757-779, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Piyapong Suwanno & Chaiwat Yaibok & Noriyasu Tsumita & Atsushi Fukuda & Kestsirin Theerathitichaipa & Manlika Seefong & Sajjakaj Jomnonkwao & Rattanaporn Kasemsri, 2023. "Estimation of the Evacuation Time According to Different Flood Depths," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, April.
    2. Loredana Antronico & Roberto Coscarelli & Francesco De Pascale & Giovanni Gull?, 2018. "La comunicazione del rischio e la percezione pubblica dei disastri: il caso studio della frana di Maierato (Calabria, Italia)," PRISMA Economia - Societ? - Lavoro, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(3), pages 9-29.
    3. Jones, Lindsey & d'Errico, Marco, 2019. "Whose resilience matters? Like-for-like comparison of objective and subjective evaluations of resilience," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 1-1.
    4. Delphine Boutin & Laurène Petifour & Haris Megzari, 2022. "Instability of preferences due to Covid-19 Crisis and emotions: a natural experiment from urban Burkina Faso," Working Papers hal-03623601, HAL.
    5. Hemant Gehlot & Arif M. Sadri & Satish V. Ukkusuri, 2019. "Joint modeling of evacuation departure and travel times in hurricanes," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 2419-2440, December.
    6. KASHIWAGI Yuzuka & TODO Yasuyuki, 2022. "Trade Disruption and Risk Perception," Discussion papers 22086, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    7. Tianlong Yu & Hao Yang & Xiaowei Luo & Yifeng Jiang & Xiang Wu & Jingqi Gao, 2021. "Scientometric Analysis of Disaster Risk Perception: 2000–2020," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-19, December.
    8. Samuel Nii Ardey Codjoe & Vivian Adams Nabie, 2014. "Climate Change and Cerebrospinal Meningitis in the Ghanaian Meningitis Belt," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, July.
    9. Kevin Fox Gotham & Richard Campanella & Katie Lauve‐Moon & Bradford Powers, 2018. "Hazard Experience, Geophysical Vulnerability, and Flood Risk Perceptions in a Postdisaster City, the Case of New Orleans," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(2), pages 345-356, February.
    10. Mendonca, Marcos Barreto de & Gullo, Fernanda Teles, 2020. "Landslide risk perception survey in Angra dos Reis (Rio de Janeiro, southeastern Brazil): A contribution to support planning of non structural measures," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    11. Ronald L. Schumann & Kevin D. Ash & Gregg C. Bowser, 2018. "Tornado Warning Perception and Response: Integrating the Roles of Visual Design, Demographics, and Hazard Experience," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(2), pages 311-332, February.
    12. Giovanni Musolino & Reza Ahmadian & Junqiang Xia, 2022. "Enhancing pedestrian evacuation routes during flood events," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 112(3), pages 1941-1965, July.
    13. Jones, Lindsey & D'Errico, Marco, 2019. "Whose resilience matters?: like-for-like comparisons of objective and subjective measures of resilience," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 101529, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. Ma. Bernadeth B. Lim & Hector R. Lim & Mongkut Piantanakulchai & Francis Aldrine Uy, 2016. "A household-level flood evacuation decision model in Quezon City, Philippines," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 80(3), pages 1539-1561, February.
    15. Francesco Russo & Corrado Rindone, 2024. "Methods for Risk Reduction: Training and Exercises to Pursue the Planned Evacuation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-17, February.
    16. Wu, Zhongqi & Jiang, Hui & Zhou, Yangye & Li, Haoyan, 2024. "Enhancing emergency medical service location model for spatial accessibility and equity under random demand and travel time," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    17. Zhi-Chun Li & Qian Liu, 2020. "Optimal deployment of emergency rescue stations in an urban transportation corridor," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 445-473, February.
    18. Eoin O'Neill & Finbarr Brereton & Harutyun Shahumyan & J. Peter Clinch, 2016. "The Impact of Perceived Flood Exposure on Flood‐Risk Perception: The Role of Distance," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(11), pages 2158-2186, November.
    19. Yudi Zhang & Lei He, 2022. "Research on the Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Community Residents’ Night Evacuation Behavior Based on Structural Equation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-21, October.
    20. N. Zhang & X. Y. Ni & H. Huang & J. L. Zhao & M. Duarte & J. Zhang, 2016. "The impact of interpersonal pre-warning information dissemination on regional emergency evacuation," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 80(3), pages 2081-2103, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:8953-:d:1499880. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.