IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i20p8939-d1499504.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis of Electric and Conventional Vehicles Performance in the Evacuation Process of Mount Semeru Eruption Victims Based on Geographic Information Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Rahmad Inca Liperda

    (Industrial Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Andalas, Padang 25175, Indonesia)

  • Rahul Prima Putra

    (Logistics Engineering Department, Faculty of Industrial Technology, Universitas Pertamina, South Jakarta 12220, Indonesia)

  • Galileo Bill Pairunan

    (Logistics Engineering Department, Faculty of Industrial Technology, Universitas Pertamina, South Jakarta 12220, Indonesia)

  • Meilinda Fitriani Nur Maghfiroh

    (Faculty of Transport and Logistics, Muscat University, Muscat 130, Oman)

  • Anak Agung Ngurah Perwira Redi

    (Industrial Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Sampoerna University, South Jakarta 12780, Indonesia)

Abstract

The Lumajang Regency is highly vulnerable to various natural disasters, particularly the potential eruption of Mount Semeru. In disaster response efforts, the local government needs to prepare effective and efficient evacuation routes, taking into account the magnitude of the eruption impact in the Semeru disaster-prone area. This research focuses on evacuating vulnerable residents using electric and conventional vehicles. This study is categorized as a vehicle routing problem with energy constraint (VRPEC) because the electric vehicles utilized in this research do not require recharging during their operational process, ensuring rapid evacuation as it is essential. By utilizing Geographic Information Systems (GIS)-based optimization, the best route to evacuate all victims within 12 h is determined. This study involves developing scenarios considering the number of vehicles and their travel distances. There are also evacuation guidelines, including the implementation of priority points and evacuation zone usage. The research results indicate that scenarios EV 5, 8, and 10 are the most optimal for using electric vehicles. Meanwhile, the optimal scenario for conventional vehicles is scenario 5. This analysis shows that implementing electric vehicle scenarios is superior to conventional vehicle scenarios in terms of the total time required to evacuate all victims.

Suggested Citation

  • Rahmad Inca Liperda & Rahul Prima Putra & Galileo Bill Pairunan & Meilinda Fitriani Nur Maghfiroh & Anak Agung Ngurah Perwira Redi, 2024. "Comparative Analysis of Electric and Conventional Vehicles Performance in the Evacuation Process of Mount Semeru Eruption Victims Based on Geographic Information Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-16, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:8939-:d:1499504
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8939/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8939/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. L N Van Wassenhove, 2006. "Humanitarian aid logistics: supply chain management in high gear," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(5), pages 475-489, May.
    2. Laporte, Gilbert, 1992. "The vehicle routing problem: An overview of exact and approximate algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(3), pages 345-358, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. CHEN, Helen S.Y., 2020. "Designing Sustainable Humanitarian Supply Chains," OSF Preprints m82ar, Center for Open Science.
    2. Eunae Yoo & Elliot Rabinovich & Bin Gu, 2020. "The Growth of Follower Networks on Social Media Platforms for Humanitarian Operations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(12), pages 2696-2715, December.
    3. Rameshwar Dubey & Nezih Altay & Constantin Blome, 2019. "Swift trust and commitment: The missing links for humanitarian supply chain coordination?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 159-177, December.
    4. Sumitkumar, Rathor & Al-Sumaiti, Ameena Saad, 2024. "Shared autonomous electric vehicle: Towards social economy of energy and mobility from power-transportation nexus perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    5. A. Anaya-Arenas & J. Renaud & A. Ruiz, 2014. "Relief distribution networks: a systematic review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 223(1), pages 53-79, December.
    6. Firas Rifai, 2018. "Transfer of Knowhow and Experiences from Commercial Logistics into Humanitarian Logistics to Improve Rescue Missions in Disaster Areas," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(3), pages 1-63, August.
    7. Dilsu Binnaz Ozkapici & Mustafa Alp Ertem & Haluk Aygüneş, 2016. "Intermodal humanitarian logistics model based on maritime transportation in Istanbul," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 83(1), pages 345-364, August.
    8. Félicia Saïah & Diego Vega & Harwin de Vries & Joakim Kembro, 2023. "Process modularity, supply chain responsiveness, and moderators: The Médecins Sans Frontières response to the Covid‐19 pandemic," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(5), pages 1490-1511, May.
    9. Dessouky, Maged M & Shao, Yihuan E, 2017. "Routing Strategies for Efficient Deployment of Alternative Fuel Vehicles for Freight Delivery," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt0nj024qn, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    10. Rajeev Kumar, 2022. "A Gig Worker-Centric Approach for Efficient Picking and Delivery of Electric Scooters," International Journal of Business Analytics (IJBAN), IGI Global, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, January.
    11. Rafiei, Rezvan & Huang, Kai & Verma, Manish, 2022. "Cash versus in-kind transfer programs in humanitarian operations: An optimization program and a case study," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PA).
    12. Loïc Cohen, 2016. "The outsourcing decision process in humanitarian supply chain management evaluated through the TCE and RBV principles," Post-Print hal-01471643, HAL.
    13. Carland, Corinne & Goentzel, Jarrod & Montibeller, Gilberto, 2018. "Modeling the values of private sector agents in multi-echelon humanitarian supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(2), pages 532-543.
    14. Yagci Sokat, Kezban & Dolinskaya, Irina S. & Smilowitz, Karen & Bank, Ryan, 2018. "Incomplete information imputation in limited data environments with application to disaster response," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(2), pages 466-485.
    15. Lea Stadtler & Luk N. Wassenhove, 2023. "Between Intensity and Diversity: Leveraging the Role of Place in Cross-Sector Partnerships," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(4), pages 773-791, May.
    16. Hu, Shaolong & Han, Chuanfeng & Dong, Zhijie Sasha & Meng, Lingpeng, 2019. "A multi-stage stochastic programming model for relief distribution considering the state of road network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 64-87.
    17. Grunert, Tore & Sebastian, Hans-Jurgen, 2000. "Planning models for long-haul operations of postal and express shipment companies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 289-309, April.
    18. Alem, Douglas & Clark, Alistair & Moreno, Alfredo, 2016. "Stochastic network models for logistics planning in disaster relief," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(1), pages 187-206.
    19. Almoustafa, Samira & Hanafi, Said & Mladenović, Nenad, 2013. "New exact method for large asymmetric distance-constrained vehicle routing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(3), pages 386-394.
    20. César Rego, 1998. "A Subpath Ejection Method for the Vehicle Routing Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(10), pages 1447-1459, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:8939-:d:1499504. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.