IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i20p8829-d1497049.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

View Selection of Safety Managers Affects Their Ability to Evaluate Safety Level of Workers

Author

Listed:
  • Xianlun Tian

    (School of Engineering, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610101, China)

  • Guohui Li

    (School of Engineering, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610101, China)

  • Ming Zhu

    (School of Engineering, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610101, China)

Abstract

Evaluating the safety level of work behaviors is an important means of safety management through safety managers’ manual visual or video surveillance. This paper aims to grasp the view selection rules of safety managers in correctly observing and analyzing work behavior, which are conducive to safety behavior assessment. Firstly, based on a similarity simulation experiment, the work process of the operators was simulated, and the process was simultaneously monitored from multiple views to obtain surveillance videos. Then, safety managers with different experience levels watched the videos and answered the questionnaire in a questionnaire survey experiment. The authors found the following: (1) Prior experience does not affect the view selection during the observation stage, but it does affect the view selection during the analysis stage. Experienced safety managers perform better in view selection when dealing with complex tasks. (2) The work postures have a significant effect on the view type and their combination order. (3) The view selection of experienced safety managers in the behavior observation and analysis stages is non-constant except for sitting posture operations, while the view selection of amateur managers is always constant. (4) Sitting posture work takes the front view as the main view and the left–right–upper views as auxiliary views; standing posture uses the left and right views as the main views and the front–back–upper views as auxiliary views; and mixed posture takes the left and right views as the main views and the upper–front–back views as auxiliary views. These view selection rules can achieve the highest evaluation performance. These findings can help train or select high-quality safety managers and provide a scientific basis for arranging views during video surveillance.

Suggested Citation

  • Xianlun Tian & Guohui Li & Ming Zhu, 2024. "View Selection of Safety Managers Affects Their Ability to Evaluate Safety Level of Workers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-17, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:8829-:d:1497049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8829/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8829/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Davide Gattamelata & Mario Fargnoli, 2022. "Development of a New Procedure for Evaluating Working Postures: An Application in a Manufacturing Company," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-20, November.
    2. Yue Chen & Qikang Zhong & Bo Li, 2023. "Positive or Negative Viewpoint Determines the Overall Scenic Beauty of a Scene: A Landscape Perception Evaluation Based on a Panoramic View," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-23, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:8829-:d:1497049. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.