IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i20p8817-d1496825.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carbon Footprint Assessment Based on Agricultural Traceability System Records: A Case Study of Onion Production in Southern Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Zi-Yi Lee

    (Central Region Campus, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Nantou 540219, Taiwan)

  • Yi-Huang Kang

    (Department of Information Management, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung 80424, Taiwan)

  • Yao-Tsung Chang

    (Kaohsiung District Agricultural Research and Extension Station, Ministry of Agriculture, Pingtung 908126, Taiwan)

  • Shun-Ho Lin

    (Hengchun Township Farmers Association, Pingtung 94641, Taiwan)

  • Chuan-Chi Chien

    (Central Region Campus, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Nantou 540219, Taiwan)

  • Shih-Chi Lee

    (Central Region Campus, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Nantou 540219, Taiwan)

  • Wen-Ching Ko

    (Central Region Campus, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Nantou 540219, Taiwan)

Abstract

This study proposes an improved methodology based on life cycle assessment (LCA), which is used to calculate the carbon footprint of agriculture, provides a simple and feasible calculation path, and constructs a streamlined framework for calculating the carbon footprint based on the agricultural traceability system records. Using important economic crop (Onion) as research subject, and choose the largest planting area in R.O.C. (southern Taiwan) as a case study. A total of 64 farm production history records have been collected, includes all of farms certified with a traceable agricultural products (TAP) label. Through a detailed analysis of the traditional carbon footprint calculation method, found that agricultural traceability system records could replace the data source in carbon footprint verification (CFV) process, and system records could be used as activity data after being organized. With our method, no need to go through a complicated CFV process, just download the existing data on agricultural traceability system, can start calculating carbon footprint as soon as possible. To compared to traditional assessment method, results show a margin of error is less than 6% compared to traditional assessment methods. Advantages of improved method were be found, such as easy data acquisition, simplified calculation steps, and improved data transparency and accuracy. From statistical data, show that at least seven categories of carbon emission sources for carbon footprints, the most significant of carbon emission impact are fertilizers. The result of improved methodology based on life cycle assessment (LCA), show that using the improved methods can help promote the carbon footprint management efficiency of agricultural organizations such as Farmers’ Association or Agricultural Production Marketing Group, promptly monitor the carbon footprint status of their fields and adjust strategies to reduce carbon footprints in real-time, advancing towards the goal of net-zero carbon emissions.

Suggested Citation

  • Zi-Yi Lee & Yi-Huang Kang & Yao-Tsung Chang & Shun-Ho Lin & Chuan-Chi Chien & Shih-Chi Lee & Wen-Ching Ko, 2024. "Carbon Footprint Assessment Based on Agricultural Traceability System Records: A Case Study of Onion Production in Southern Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-17, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:8817-:d:1496825
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8817/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8817/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:8817-:d:1496825. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.