IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i19p8409-d1487155.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Life Cycle Assessment Study on Carbon Footprint of Water Treatment Plants: Case Study of Indonesia and Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Ouattara

    (Institute of Environmental Engineering and Management, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 106344, Taiwan)

  • Resita Nadya Noor Azhaari

    (PT. Semen Indonesia (Persero) Tbk, Jakarta 12950, Indonesia)

  • Allen H. Hu

    (Institute of Environmental Engineering and Management, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 106344, Taiwan)

  • Chien-Hung Kuo

    (Institute of Environmental Engineering and Management, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 106344, Taiwan)

  • Hongwei (Lance) Huang

    (Institute of Environmental Engineering and Management, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 106344, Taiwan)

Abstract

Access to clean and safe water is essential to sustain human life. With the growth of the world population, the demand for clean water is also increasing. Water Treatment Plants (WTPs) are among the highest electricity consumers, thus causing damage to the environment and human health by producing solid waste and sludge as by-products, along with air pollution and noise. With the fourth highest population in the world, Indonesia faces a high demand for clean water. The country has pledged to reach net zero by 2060 or sooner, requiring effort in all sectors of the economy. Taiwan is relatively small compared to Indonesia but has a higher average clean water supply per capita than Indonesia. This study assessed and compared the Carbon Footprint (CF) emitted from four WTPs in Indonesia and Taiwan. A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was used, employing a cradle to gate as the methodology. The results showed that the Indonesian WTPs emit more CF than the Taiwanese ones. Electricity consumption from the intake operation and screening process mainly contributes to the CF in most of the studied WTPs. While chemical usage is related to the amount of treated water and the water quality regulations, their consumption has more impact on ecosystem services in Taiwan. Using both renewable energy and good chemical management will be a better solution to lessen the environmental impact of all of these WTPs.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Ouattara & Resita Nadya Noor Azhaari & Allen H. Hu & Chien-Hung Kuo & Hongwei (Lance) Huang, 2024. "Comparative Life Cycle Assessment Study on Carbon Footprint of Water Treatment Plants: Case Study of Indonesia and Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-17, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8409-:d:1487155
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8409/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8409/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8409-:d:1487155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.