Author
Listed:
- Shenli Zhou
(Institute of Geochemical Exploration and Marine Geological Survey, ECE, Nanjing 210007, China)
- Xiaokai Li
(School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China)
- Pengcheng Zhang
(Institute of Geochemical Exploration and Marine Geological Survey, ECE, Nanjing 210007, China)
- Gang Lu
(Institute of Geochemical Exploration and Marine Geological Survey, ECE, Nanjing 210007, China)
- Xiaolong Zhang
(School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China)
- Huaqing Zhang
(School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China)
- Faming Zhang
(School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China)
Abstract
Open-pit mining seriously damages the original vegetation community and soil layer and disturbs the carbon cycle of vegetation and soil, causing instability in the mining ecosystem and decrease in the carbon sequestration capacity of the mining area. With the deepening of environmental awareness and the influence of related policies, the ecological restoration of open-pit mines has been promoted. The mining ecosystem is distinct owing to the disperse distribution of mines and small scale of single mines. However, the carbon sequestration capability of mines after ecological restoration has not been clearly evaluated. Therefore, this study evaluated the carbon sequestration capacity of restoration mines, taking the mines of the Yangtze River Basin in Jurong City, Jiangsu Province as the research objects. Firstly, the visual effects of the vegetation and soil in their current status were determined through field investigation, the methods for sampling and data collection for the vegetation and soil were selected, and the specific laboratory tests such as the vegetation carbon content and soil organic carbon were clarified. Meanwhile, the evaluation system consisting of three aspects and nine evaluation indexes was established by using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (FCE). The process of evaluation included the following: the establishment of the judgment matrix, calculation of the index weight, determination of the membership function, and establishment of the fuzzy membership matrix. Finally, the evaluation results of the restoration mines were determined with the ‘excellent, good, normal and poor’ grade classification according to the evaluation standards for each index proposed considering the data of the field investigation and laboratory tests. The results indicated that (1) the evaluation results of the mines’ carbon sequestration capacity were of excellent and good grade at a proportion of 62.5% and 37.5%, which was in line with the field investigation results and demonstrated the carbon sequestration capacity of all the restored mines was effectively improved; and (2) the weights of the criterion layer were ranked as system stability > vegetation > soil with the largest value of 0.547, indicating the stability of the system is the main factor in the carbon sequestration capacity of the mines and the sustainability of the vegetation community and the stability of soil fixation on the slope. The proposed evaluation system effectively evaluates the short-term carbon sequestration capability of the restoration mining system according to the visual effects and the laboratory testing results, objectively reflecting the carbon sequestration capacity via qualitative assessment and quantitative analysis. The evaluation method is relatively applicable and reliable for restoration mines and can provide a reference for similar ecological restoration engineering.
Suggested Citation
Shenli Zhou & Xiaokai Li & Pengcheng Zhang & Gang Lu & Xiaolong Zhang & Huaqing Zhang & Faming Zhang, 2024.
"Carbon Sequestration Capacity after Ecological Restoration of Open-Pit Mines: A Case Study in Yangtze River Basin, Jurong City, Jiangsu Province,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-22, September.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:18:p:8149-:d:1480538
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Lijia Zhang & Zhenqi Hu & Dazhi Yang & Huanhuan Li & Bo Liu & He Gao & Congjie Cao & Yan Zhou & Junfang Li & Shuchang Li, 2022.
"Land Use Dynamic Evolution and Driving Factors of Typical Open-Pit Coal Mines in Inner Mongolia,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-14, August.
- Avinash Kumar Ranjan & Bikash Ranjan Parida & Jadunandan Dash & Amit Kumar Gorai, 2023.
"Evaluating Impacts of Opencast Stone Mining on Vegetation Primary Production and Transpiration over Rajmahal Hills,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-22, May.
- Ya Shao & Qinxue Xu & Xi Wei, 2023.
"Progress of Mine Land Reclamation and Ecological Restoration Research Based on Bibliometric Analysis,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-19, July.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
- Hangfeng Qu & Xibin Dong & Baoshan Zhang & Hui Liu & Tong Gao & Yuan Meng & Yunze Ren & Ying Zhang, 2024.
"Evaluation of Ecological Function Restoration Effect for Degraded Natural Forests in Xiaoxinganling, China,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-24, February.
- Ya Shao & Qinxue Xu & Xi Wei, 2023.
"Progress of Mine Land Reclamation and Ecological Restoration Research Based on Bibliometric Analysis,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-19, July.
- Xuesong Li & Zhenjiang Jin & Liyuan Xiong & Lingchen Tong & Hongying Zhu & Xiaowen Zhang & Guangfa Qin, 2022.
"Effects of Land Reclamation on Soil Bacterial Community and Potential Functions in Bauxite Mining Area,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-17, December.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:18:p:8149-:d:1480538. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.