IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i17p7487-d1467072.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial and Temporal Matching Measurement of Ecosystem Service Supply, Demand and Human Well-Being and Its Coordination in the Great Rivers Economic Belt—Evidence from China’s Yangtze River Economic Belt

Author

Listed:
  • Zhijun Luo

    (College of Land Resources and Environment, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China)

  • Songkai Luo

    (College of Land Resources and Environment, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China)

  • Fengchang Zhang

    (College of Land Resources and Environment, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China)

  • Xiaofang Yang

    (College of Land Resources and Environment, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China)

Abstract

Understanding the complex relationship between ESSD and human well-being is of paramount significance to protecting regional ecology, enhancing human well-being and achieving sustainable development. We take the Yangtze River Economic Belt as an example and use multi-source data to analyse land use and cover change, as well as the spatiotemporal evolution of ESSD and human well-being. We explore and reveal the coupling coordination relationship between ESSD and human well-being. The results show that from 2000 to 2020, the overall trend in ESs in the region improved significantly, and the supply notably increased, whereas the demand growth rate was even more pronounced. The supply–demand ratio for water yield and soil conservation showed little change, with variations of <10%. However, the supply–demand ratio for carbon sequestration declined significantly by 41.83%, whereas that for food supply increased notably by 42.93%. The overall spatial pattern in ESSD presented a mismatch, which was characterised by ‘low supply and high demand in the eastern region and high supply and low demand in the western region’. Overall, human well-being remained stable and was in line with the level of socio-economic development, thereby exhibiting a distinct trend of well-being ‘polarisation between the rich and poor’. Well-being was higher in the eastern and central urban agglomerations and lower in the western plateau and mountainous areas. Over 20 years, the degree of coupling coordination between ESSD and human well-being increased by 0.0107, and the coupling level gradually transitioned from moderate imbalance to moderate coordination. Spatially, Hubei Province, Chongqing Municipality and the Yangtze River Delta were the main ‘high–high’ agglomeration areas, whereas the Sichuan Basin and the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau were the main ‘low–low’ agglomeration areas. Based on these findings, we propose the following management recommendations for the Yangtze River Economic Belt and other related great river economic belts: optimise land use structure, rationally allocate natural resources, strengthen regional and external connections and promote regional coordinated development, enhance the implementation of policies for ecological and environmental protection, establish regional ecological compensation mechanisms and coordinate ecological protection in a full scope and focus on harmonising human–land relationships, build a multi-stakeholder collaborative governance mechanism and promote regional ecological protection and the elevation of human well-being.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhijun Luo & Songkai Luo & Fengchang Zhang & Xiaofang Yang, 2024. "Spatial and Temporal Matching Measurement of Ecosystem Service Supply, Demand and Human Well-Being and Its Coordination in the Great Rivers Economic Belt—Evidence from China’s Yangtze River Economic B," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-24, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7487-:d:1467072
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7487/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7487/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dong, Qianyu & Zhong, Kaiyi & Liao, Yijia & Xiong, Runli & Wang, Fengbo & Pang, Min, 2023. "Coupling coordination degree of environment, energy, and economic growth in resource-based provinces of China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Huiming & Xu, Lu & Zhou, Peng & Zhu, Xiaodong & Cudjoe, Dan, 2024. "Coordination between economic growth and carbon emissions: Evidence from 178 cities in China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 164-180.
    2. Wang, Yue & Liu, Guwang & Zhang, Yan & Guo, Xiaoqian & Guo, Shaobo, 2024. "The impact of the evolution of the iron raw material trade pattern on the national economy: The B&R perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    3. Fengfan Han & Anqi Ren & Jinxin Liu & Lixingbo Yu & Fei Jia & Haochen Hou & Ying Liu, 2024. "Towards Sustainable Industry: A Comprehensive Review of Energy–Economy–Environment System Analysis and Future Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-19, June.
    4. Shunsheng Wang & Ruijie Yang & Shang Shi & Aili Wang & Tengfei Liu & Jinyue Yang, 2023. "Characteristics and Influencing Factors of the Spatial and Temporal Variability of the Coupled Water–Energy–Food Nexus in the Yellow River Basin in Henan Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-17, September.
    5. Haiqiang Zhu & Junhu Tang & Xia Xie & Zhaolong Ding & Lu Gong, 2024. "A Coordination Analysis on Rural Revitalization and Tourism High-Quality Development along the Silk Road Economic Belt, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, July.
    6. Hua Zhu & Qing Zhang & Hailin You, 2024. "A Water–Energy–Carbon–Economy Framework to Assess Resources and Environment Sustainability: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-20, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7487-:d:1467072. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.