IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i17p7480-d1466971.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Power Conversion System Options for ARC-like Tokamak Fusion Reactor Balance of Plant

Author

Listed:
  • Francesco Colliva

    (DIAEE—Nuclear Engineering Research Group (NERG), Sapienza University of Rome, Corso Vittorio Emanuele II 244, 00186 Rome, Italy)

  • Cristiano Ciurluini

    (DIAEE—Nuclear Engineering Research Group (NERG), Sapienza University of Rome, Corso Vittorio Emanuele II 244, 00186 Rome, Italy)

  • Andrea Iaboni

    (MAFE, Eni S.p.A., 30175 Venezia, Italy)

  • Giulia Valeria Centomani

    (MAFE, Eni S.p.A., 30175 Venezia, Italy)

  • Antonio Trotta

    (MAFE, Eni S.p.A., 30175 Venezia, Italy)

  • Fabio Giannetti

    (DIAEE—Nuclear Engineering Research Group (NERG), Sapienza University of Rome, Corso Vittorio Emanuele II 244, 00186 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

In recent years, fusion energy has assumed an important role in the energy scenario, being a sustainable, environmentally friendly, and practically inexhaustible energy source. Fusion energy could play a crucial role in fully decarbonized electricity production in the second half of this century, helping to meet the increasing energy demand. One of the studied reactors is ARC, a tokamak fusion device characterized by a compact and high-field design initially conceived by researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, which the Commonwealth Fusion System (CFS) plans to construct in the next decade. This paper is focused on the analysis and development of different configurations for the ARC Balance of Plant Power Conversion System, with the aim of improving the thermodynamic efficiency, which is one of the pillars of sustainability. Three cycles were studied by using the General Electric GateCycle TM software: a supercritical steam Rankine cycle, a supercritical CO 2 Brayton cycle, and a supercritical helium Brayton cycle. The thermal efficiency of the three options was compared to select the most promising solution. The results showed that the supercritical steam cycle is the best configuration in terms of cycle efficiency for the ARC FNSF Pilot phase.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesco Colliva & Cristiano Ciurluini & Andrea Iaboni & Giulia Valeria Centomani & Antonio Trotta & Fabio Giannetti, 2024. "Analysis of Power Conversion System Options for ARC-like Tokamak Fusion Reactor Balance of Plant," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-18, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7480-:d:1466971
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7480/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7480/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Linares, José Ignacio & Cantizano, Alexis & Moratilla, Beatriz Yolanda & Martín-Palacios, Víctor & Batet, Lluis, 2016. "Supercritical CO2 Brayton power cycles for DEMO (demonstration power plant) fusion reactor based on dual coolant lithium lead blanket," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 271-283.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ma, Yuegeng & Liu, Ming & Yan, Junjie & Liu, Jiping, 2017. "Thermodynamic study of main compression intercooling effects on supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 746-756.
    2. Gao, Lei & Cao, Tao & Hwang, Yunho & Radermacher, Reinhard, 2022. "Robustness analysis in supercritical CO2 power generation system configuration optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    3. Crespi, Francesco & Gavagnin, Giacomo & Sánchez, David & Martínez, Gonzalo S., 2017. "Supercritical carbon dioxide cycles for power generation: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 152-183.
    4. Chen, Zhansheng & Wan, Teng & Zhao, Pinghui & Lei, Mingzhun & Li, Yuanjie, 2021. "Study of power conversion system for Chinese Fusion Engineering Testing Reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    5. Wang, Feng & Li, Rongfeng & Ding, Cuiping & Tang, Wukui & Wang, Yibo & Xu, Shimeng & Yu, Ronghai & Wang, Zhongmin, 2017. "Enhanced hydrogen storage properties of ZrCo alloy decorated with flower-like Pd particles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 8-17.
    6. Santini, Lorenzo & Accornero, Carlo & Cioncolini, Andrea, 2016. "On the adoption of carbon dioxide thermodynamic cycles for nuclear power conversion: A case study applied to Mochovce 3 Nuclear Power Plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 446-463.
    7. Wang, Rui & Wang, Xuan & Shu, Gequn & Tian, Hua & Cai, Jinwen & Bian, Xingyan & Li, Xinyu & Qin, Zheng & Shi, Lingfeng, 2022. "Comparison of different load-following control strategies of a sCO2 Brayton cycle under full load range," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    8. Yang, Yiping & Huang, Yulei & Jiang, Peixue & Zhu, Yinhai, 2020. "Multi-objective optimization of combined cooling, heating, and power systems with supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    9. Bai, Wengang & Li, Hongzhi & Zhang, Lei & Zhang, Yifan & Yang, Yu & Zhang, Chun & Yao, Mingyu, 2021. "Energy and exergy analyses of an improved recompression supercritical CO2 cycle for coal-fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    10. Linares, José Ignacio & Cantizano, Alexis & Arenas, Eva & Moratilla, Beatriz Yolanda & Martín-Palacios, Víctor & Batet, Lluis, 2017. "Recuperated versus single-recuperator re-compressed supercritical CO2 Brayton power cycles for DEMO fusion reactor based on dual coolant lithium lead blanket," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 307-317.
    11. Park, Joo Hyun & Park, Hyun Sun & Kwon, Jin Gyu & Kim, Tae Ho & Kim, Moo Hwan, 2018. "Optimization and thermodynamic analysis of supercritical CO2 Brayton recompression cycle for various small modular reactors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 520-535.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7480-:d:1466971. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.