IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i17p7315-d1463994.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Impact of Straw Burning on PM 2.5 Using Explainable Machine Learning: A Case Study in Heilongjiang Province, China

Author

Listed:
  • Zehua Xu

    (Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China)

  • Baiyin Liu

    (Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China)

  • Wei Wang

    (Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China)

  • Zhimiao Zhang

    (Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China)

  • Wenting Qiu

    (Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China)

Abstract

Straw burning is recognized as a significant contributor to deteriorating air quality, but its specific impacts, particularly on PM 2.5 concentrations, are still not fully understood or quantified. In this study, we conducted a detailed examination of the spatial and temporal patterns of straw burning in Heilongjiang Province, China—a key agricultural area—utilizing high-resolution fire-point data from the Fengyun-3 satellite. We subsequently employed random forest (RF) models alongside Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAPs) to systematically evaluate the impact of various determinants, including straw burning (as indicated by crop fire-point data), meteorological conditions, and aerosol optical depth (AOD), on PM 2.5 levels across spatial and temporal dimensions. Our findings indicated a statistically nonsignificant downward trend in the number of crop fires in Heilongjiang Province from 2015 to 2023, with hotspots mainly concentrated in the western and southern parts of the province. On a monthly scale, straw burning was primarily observed from February to April and October to November—which are critical periods in the agricultural calendar—accounting for 97% of the annual fire counts. The RF models achieved excellent performance in predicting PM 2.5 levels, with R 2 values of 0.997 for temporal and 0.746 for spatial predictions. The SHAP analysis revealed the number of fire points to be the key determinant of temporal PM 2.5 variations during straw-burning periods, explaining 72% of the variance. However, the significance was markedly reduced in the spatial analysis. This study leveraged machine learning and interpretable modeling techniques to provide a comprehensive understanding of the influence of straw burning on PM 2.5 levels, both temporally and spatially. The detailed analysis offers valuable insights for policymakers to formulate more targeted and effective strategies to combat air pollution.

Suggested Citation

  • Zehua Xu & Baiyin Liu & Wei Wang & Zhimiao Zhang & Wenting Qiu, 2024. "Assessing the Impact of Straw Burning on PM 2.5 Using Explainable Machine Learning: A Case Study in Heilongjiang Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-15, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7315-:d:1463994
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7315/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7315/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhenzhen Wang & Jianjun Zhao & Jiawen Xu & Mingrui Jia & Han Li & Shijun Wang, 2019. "Influence of Straw Burning on Urban Air Pollutant Concentrations in Northeast China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-21, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7315-:d:1463994. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.