IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i16p7205-d1461332.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Sustainable Oil and Gas Infrastructure Decommissioning: A Systematic Review of Criteria Involved in the Process

Author

Listed:
  • Xin Wei

    (School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

  • Jin Zhou

    (Faculty of Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia)

Abstract

The decommissioning of oil and gas (O&G, hereafter) facilities presents complex challenges when addressing the diverse needs of stakeholders. By synthesizing information from previous Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA, hereafter) studies on decommissioning projects, this study aims to do the following: (a) formulate a structured set of criteria adaptable to MCDA for both offshore and onshore O&G decommissioning, (b) identify and analyze the evolving trends and regional disparities in MCDA for decommissioning, and (c) explore current O&G onshore decommissioning procedures and map specific criteria to these processes. Following a systematic literature review approach, this study analyzed 63 references across four stages from 2006 to 2024 and identified 158 criteria. These criteria were consolidated into a framework of 22 factors across dimensions comprising technical, environmental, societal, financial, health and safety considerations, and additional concerns from stakeholders. This study observed a significant focus shift from technical aspects to environmental considerations in decommissioning practices from 2011 onwards, reflecting growing awareness of sustainability. It also revealed regional differences, such as the technical emphasis in the North Sea and environmental concerns in Australia. Furthermore, this study refined O&G onshore decommissioning procedures and identified criteria gaps for further research, particularly in societal impact regarding public resource availability, recreational opportunities, and operating company reputation. The study provides a robust foundation for the development of future MCDA frameworks tailored to O&G infrastructure decommissioning projects, thus supporting long-term environmental and social sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Xin Wei & Jin Zhou, 2024. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Sustainable Oil and Gas Infrastructure Decommissioning: A Systematic Review of Criteria Involved in the Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-21, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:7205-:d:1461332
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/7205/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/7205/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fernanda F. Moraes & Virgílio José M. Ferreira Filho & Carlos Eduardo Durange de C. Infante & Luan Santos & Edilson F. Arruda, 2022. "A Markov Chain Approach to Multicriteria Decision Analysis with an Application to Offshore Decommissioning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Ibragim Khalidov & Konstantin Milovidov & Yury Stepin, 2023. "Models for the Multicriteria Selection of Options for Decommissioning Projects for Offshore Oil and Gas Structures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-19, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:7205-:d:1461332. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.