IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i16p7002-d1456975.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling of Soil Cation Exchange Capacity Based on Chemometrics, Various Spectral Transformations, and Multivariate Approaches in Some Soils of Arid Zones

Author

Listed:
  • Abdel-rahman A. Mustafa

    (Soil and Water Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Sohag University, Sohag 82524, Egypt)

  • Elsayed A. Abdelsamie

    (National Authority for Remote Sensing and Space Sciences, Cairo 11843, Egypt)

  • Elsayed Said Mohamed

    (National Authority for Remote Sensing and Space Sciences, Cairo 11843, Egypt
    Department of Environmental Management, Institute of Environmental Engineering, RUDN University, 6 Miklukho-Maklaya St., Moscow 117198, Russia)

  • Nazih Y. Rebouh

    (Department of Environmental Management, Institute of Environmental Engineering, RUDN University, 6 Miklukho-Maklaya St., Moscow 117198, Russia)

  • Mohamed S. Shokr

    (Soil and Water Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Tanta University, Tanta 31527, Egypt)

Abstract

Cation exchange capacity is a crucial metric for managing soil fertility and promoting agricultural sustainability. An alternative technique for the non-destructive assessment of important soil parameters is reflectance spectroscopy. The main focus of this paper is on how to analyze and predict the content of various soil cation exchange capacities (CEC) in arid conditions (Sohag governorate, Egypt) at a low cost using laboratory analysis of CEC, visible near-infrared and shortwave infrared (Vis-NIR) spectroscopy, partial least-squares regression (PLSR), and Ordinary Kriging (OK). Utilizing reflectance spectroscopy with a spectral resolution of 10 nm and laboratory studies with a spectral range of 350 to 2500 nm, 104 surface soil samples were collected to a depth of 30 cm in the Sohag governorate, Egypt (which is part of the dry region of North Africa), in order to accomplish this goal. The association between the spectroradiometer and CEC averaged values was modeled using PLSR in order to map the predicted value using Ordinary Kriging (OK). Thirty-one soil samples were selected for validation. The predictive validity of the cross-validated models was evaluated using the coefficient of determination (R 2 ), root mean square error (RMSE), residual prediction deviation (RPD), and ratio of performance to interquartile distance (RPIQ). The results indicate that ten transformation methods yielded calibration models that met the study’s requirements, with R 2 > 0.6, RPQ > 2.5, and RIQP > 4.05. For evaluating CEC in Vis-NIR spectra, the most efficient transformation and calibration model was the reciprocal of Log R transformation (R 2 = 0.98, RMSE = 0.40, RPD = 6.99, and RIQP = 9.22). This implies that combining the reciprocal of Log R with PLSR yields the optimal model for predicting CEC values. The CEC values were best fitted by four models: spherical, exponential, Gaussian, and circular. The methodology used here does offer a “quick”, inexpensive tool that can be broadly and quickly used, and it can be readily implemented again in comparable conditions in arid regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdel-rahman A. Mustafa & Elsayed A. Abdelsamie & Elsayed Said Mohamed & Nazih Y. Rebouh & Mohamed S. Shokr, 2024. "Modeling of Soil Cation Exchange Capacity Based on Chemometrics, Various Spectral Transformations, and Multivariate Approaches in Some Soils of Arid Zones," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-17, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:7002-:d:1456975
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/7002/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/7002/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fuat Kaya & Gaurav Mishra & Rosa Francaviglia & Ali Keshavarzi, 2023. "Combining Digital Covariates and Machine Learning Models to Predict the Spatial Variation of Soil Cation Exchange Capacity," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:7002-:d:1456975. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.