IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i15p6328-d1441797.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Traceability of Phreatic Groundwater Contaminants and the Threat to Human Health: A Case Study in the Tabu River Basin, North China

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Zhang

    (Yinshanbeilu Grassland Eco–Hydrology National Field Observation and Research Station, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China
    Institute of Pastoral Hydraulic Research, Ministry of Water Resources of China, Hohhot 010020, China)

  • Zilong Liao

    (Yinshanbeilu Grassland Eco–Hydrology National Field Observation and Research Station, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China
    Institute of Pastoral Hydraulic Research, Ministry of Water Resources of China, Hohhot 010020, China)

  • Jing Jin

    (Yinshanbeilu Grassland Eco–Hydrology National Field Observation and Research Station, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China
    Institute of Pastoral Hydraulic Research, Ministry of Water Resources of China, Hohhot 010020, China
    Collaborative Innovation Center for Grassland Ecological Security (Jointly Supported by the Ministry of Education of China and Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region), Hohhot 010021, China)

  • Yanyan Ni

    (State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Soil Environmental Management and Pollution Control, Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment of China, Nanjing 210042, China)

  • Jian Xu

    (State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Soil Environmental Management and Pollution Control, Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment of China, Nanjing 210042, China)

  • Mingxin Wang

    (Yinshanbeilu Grassland Eco–Hydrology National Field Observation and Research Station, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China
    Institute of Pastoral Hydraulic Research, Ministry of Water Resources of China, Hohhot 010020, China)

  • Zihe Wang

    (Yinshanbeilu Grassland Eco–Hydrology National Field Observation and Research Station, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China
    Institute of Pastoral Hydraulic Research, Ministry of Water Resources of China, Hohhot 010020, China)

  • Yiping Zhao

    (Yinshanbeilu Grassland Eco–Hydrology National Field Observation and Research Station, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China
    Institute of Pastoral Hydraulic Research, Ministry of Water Resources of China, Hohhot 010020, China)

  • Yuanzheng Zhang

    (State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Soil Environmental Management and Pollution Control, Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment of China, Nanjing 210042, China)

Abstract

Groundwater is the main clean water resource in northern China, and its quality is critical for both human health and social sustainable development. Due to complex anthropogenic and/or geogenic processes, the sources of groundwater contaminants are not easy to determine. The Tabu River Basin, located in northern China, is an agriculture and pasture interlaced area in which phreatic groundwater is the predominant water resource for domestic and agricultural purposes. Groundwater with abnormally high levels of NO 3 − , F − , and TDS was observed here based on 87 groundwater samples collected from the phreatic aquifer in 2022. In this study, hydrogeochemical and isotopic methods were used to trace groundwater contaminants in the phreatic aquifer, and a risk assessment was conducted to analyze their threat to human health. The results indicated that NO 3 − in the phreatic groundwater primarily originated from manure, the high concentration of TDS was highly associated with irrigation, and the enrichment of F − was mainly controlled by geogenic factors, including alkaline condition, competitive adsorption, the dissolution of fluorine-bearing minerals, and cation exchange. A principal component analysis (PCA) showed that both anthropogenic (PC1, 50.7%) and geogenic (PC2, 19.9%) factors determined the quality of the phreatic groundwater in the study area. The human health risk assessment demonstrated that 98.9%, 92.0%, and 80.5% of the groundwater samples exceeded the permissible limit of the total noncarcinogenic risk for children, adult females, and adult males, respectively. The monitoring results from 2022 to 2023 suggested that phreatic groundwater contamination could not be mitigated through natural attenuation under the existing external pressures. Measures need to be taken to decrease the contamination of phreatic groundwater and enhance the groundwater sustainability in the Tabu River Basin. The findings of this study can provide a reference for sustainable groundwater development in the Tabu River Basin and other arid and semi-arid regions worldwide.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Zhang & Zilong Liao & Jing Jin & Yanyan Ni & Jian Xu & Mingxin Wang & Zihe Wang & Yiping Zhao & Yuanzheng Zhang, 2024. "Traceability of Phreatic Groundwater Contaminants and the Threat to Human Health: A Case Study in the Tabu River Basin, North China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-18, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:15:p:6328-:d:1441797
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/15/6328/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/15/6328/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jing Jin & Tiejun Liu & Mingxin Wang & Zilong Liao & Jing Zhang, 2023. "Hydrochemical and Isotopic Explanations of the Interaction between Surface Water and Groundwater in a Typical-Desertified Steppe of Northern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-17, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:15:p:6328-:d:1441797. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.