IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i14p6218-d1439403.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When Heritage and Landscape Values Are Confronted by Planned Infrastructures: A Glance at ‘Public Debate’ (‘Dibattito Pubblico’) Procedures in Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Remi Wacogne

    (Dipartimento di Culture del Progetto, Università Iuav di Venezia, Dorsoduro 2196, Cotonificio Veneziano, 30123 Venezia, Italy
    Dipartimento di Filosofia e Beni Culturali, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Dorsoduro 3246, 30123 Venezia, Italy)

Abstract

Public debate procedures (“dibattito pubblico”, DP) have been recently introduced in Italy to provide an additional platform for public participation into infrastructure-related decision-making processes. Inspired by their French equivalent (“débat public”), these procedures sensibly differ from EIAs as they occur at a very early stage, i.e., before projects’ final drafting. Another significant difference, specific to the Italian context, is a provision dedicated to heritage sites and protected areas foreseeing a wider application of DPs in those contexts. This paper aims to further explore the different relationships between actors at play within DP procedures on the one hand, and heritage sites and landscapes on the other hand, through the analysis of dedicated reports and other documents. Heritage- and landscape-related values are commonly mobilized in relation to all infrastructural projects considered, although in various ways and sometimes with conflicting aims. The article highlights that environmental conflicts are likely to affect and mobilize heritage and landscape values, and calls for a closer dialogue between infrastructure planning, heritage and landscape planning, and political ecology.

Suggested Citation

  • Remi Wacogne, 2024. "When Heritage and Landscape Values Are Confronted by Planned Infrastructures: A Glance at ‘Public Debate’ (‘Dibattito Pubblico’) Procedures in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-10, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:14:p:6218-:d:1439403
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/14/6218/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/14/6218/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Irene Arias-Navarro & Francisco José Del Campo-Gomis & Asunción M. Agulló-Torres & África Martinez-Poveda, 2023. "Environmental Sustainability in Vineyards under a Protected Designation of Origin in View of the Implementation of Photovoltaic Solar Energy Plants," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-25, October.
    2. Marco Segreto & Lucas Principe & Alexandra Desormeaux & Marco Torre & Laura Tomassetti & Patrizio Tratzi & Valerio Paolini & Francesco Petracchini, 2020. "Trends in Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy Across Europe—A Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Yann Fournis & Marie-José Fortin, 2017. "From social ‘acceptance’ to social ‘acceptability’ of wind energy projects: towards a territorial perspective," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(1), pages 1-21, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Faulques, Martin & Bonnet, Jean & Bourdin, Sébastien & Juge, Marine & Pigeon, Jonas & Richard, Charlotte, 2022. "Generational effect and territorial distributive justice, the two main drivers for willingness to pay for renewable energies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    2. Hübner, Gundula & Leschinger, Valentin & Müller, Florian J.Y. & Pohl, Johannes, 2023. "Broadening the social acceptance of wind energy – An Integrated Acceptance Model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    3. Ryo Kohsaka & Satomi Kohyama, 2023. "Contested renewable energy sites due to landscape and socio-ecological barriers: Comparison of wind and solar power installation cases in Japan," Energy & Environment, , vol. 34(7), pages 2619-2641, November.
    4. Altsitsiadis, E. & Kaiser, M. & Tsakas, A. & Kyriakidis, A. & Stamos, A., 2024. "Investigating the Regional and Individual Drivers of the Support for Renewable Energy Transition: The Role of Severe Material Deprivation," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2419, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    5. Madani, Seyyedreza & Pineau, Pierre-Olivier, 2024. "Investment in vehicle-to-grid and distributed energy resources: Distributor versus prosumer perspectives and the impact of rate structures," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    6. Eckert, Linus & Schemel, Benjamin & Stagl, Sigrid, 2024. "Gesellschaftliche Akzeptanz von Klimaschutzmaßnahmen," Ecological Economic Papers 47/2024, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    7. Satymov, Rasul & Bogdanov, Dmitrii & Dadashi, Mojtaba & Lavidas, George & Breyer, Christian, 2024. "Techno-economic assessment of global and regional wave energy resource potentials and profiles in hourly resolution," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 364(C).
    8. Haider Mahmood & Muhammad Tanveer & Maham Furqan, 2021. "Rule of Law, Corruption Control, Governance, and Economic Growth in Managing Renewable and Nonrenewable Energy Consumption in South Asia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-19, October.
    9. Lisiak-Zielińska, Marta & Jałoszyńska, Sylwia & Borowiak, Klaudia & Budka, Anna & Dach, Jacek, 2023. "Perception of biogas plants: A public awareness and preference - A case study for the agricultural landscape," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    10. Bishal Bharadwaj & Franzisca Weder & Peta Ashworth, 2023. "More support for hydrogen export than its domestic application in Australia," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-8, December.
    11. Ponce Oliva, R.D. & Estay, M. & Barrientos, M. & Estevez, R.A. & Gelcich, S. & Vásquez-Lavín, F., 2024. "Emerging energy sources' social acceptability: Evidence from marine-based energy projects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    12. Anna Codemo & Ambra Barbini & Ahi Mantouza & Anastasios Bitziadis & Rossano Albatici, 2023. "Integration of Public Perception in the Assessment of Licensed Solar Farms: A Case Study in Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-25, June.
    13. Dianwu Wang & Zina Yu & Haiying Liu & Xianzhe Cai & Zhiqun Zhang, 2024. "Green Consumption, Environmental Regulation and Carbon Emissions—An Empirical Study Based on a PVAR Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-16, January.
    14. Grashof, Katherina, 2019. "Are auctions likely to deter community wind projects? And would this be problematic?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 20-32.
    15. Ugur Bilgin & Selin Soner Kara, 2024. "Identification of Perceived Challenges in the Green Energy Transition by Turkish Society through Sentiment Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-22, April.
    16. López-Bravo, Celia & Mora-López, Llanos & Sidrach-deCardona, Mariano & Márquez-Ballesteros, María José, 2024. "A comprehensive analysis based on GIS-AHP to minimise the social and environmental impact of the installation of large-scale photovoltaic plants in south Spain," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    17. Juan Romero-Luis & Manuel Gertrudix & María del Carmen Gertrudis Casado & Alejandro Carbonell-Alcocer, 2023. "Biotechnology and Bio-Based Products Perceptions in the Community of Madrid: A Representative Survey Dataset," Data, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-6, May.
    18. Borch, Kristian, 2018. "Mapping value perspectives on wind power projects: The case of the danish test centre for large wind turbines," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 251-258.
    19. Busse, Maria & Siebert, Rosemarie, 2018. "Acceptance studies in the field of land use—A critical and systematic review to advance the conceptualization of acceptance and acceptability," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 235-245.
    20. Marula Tsagkari & Jordi Roca & Phedeas Stephanides, 2022. "Sustainability of local renewable energy projects: A comprehensive framework and an empirical analysis on two islands," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(5), pages 1155-1168, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:14:p:6218-:d:1439403. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.