IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i14p6146-d1437927.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Joint Emission-Dependent Optimal Production and Preventive Maintenance Policies of a Deteriorating Manufacturing System

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Gharbi

    (Systems Engineering Department, École de Technologie Supérieure, Production System Design and Control Laboratory, University of Quebec, 1100 Notre-Dame West, Montreal, QC H3C 1K3, Canada)

  • Jean-Pierre Kenné

    (Mechanical Engineering Department, École de Technologie Supérieure, Production System Design and Control Laboratory, University of Quebec, 1100 Notre-Dame West, Montreal, QC H3C 1K3, Canada)

  • Armel Leonel Kuegoua Takengny

    (Mechanical Engineering Department, École de Technologie Supérieure, Production System Design and Control Laboratory, University of Quebec, 1100 Notre-Dame West, Montreal, QC H3C 1K3, Canada)

  • Morad Assid

    (Systems Engineering Department, École de Technologie Supérieure, Production System Design and Control Laboratory, University of Quebec, 1100 Notre-Dame West, Montreal, QC H3C 1K3, Canada)

Abstract

This paper addresses the problem of joint production and preventive maintenance (PM) planning of a deteriorating manufacturing system generating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The system is composed of a deteriorating machine, subject to random failures and repairs evolving in a dynamic and stochastic context. The main objective is to develop control policies that minimize the sum of backlog, inventory, maintenance, and emission costs. The stochastic optimal control theory based on the dynamic programming approach is used to obtain the optimality conditions and the optimal control policies, which are determined using numerical methods. Sensitivity analyses are provided to depict and validate the obtained structure of the production and PM policies characterized by multiple thresholds that jointly regulate the production and PM rates with the age, emissions, and inventory levels. Furthermore, we compared the performance of the obtained control policies with that of the most relevant policies found in the literature and showed their superiority by considerable cost savings. Finally, the proposal’s implementation is provided to equip managers of the considered manufacturing system with an effective and robust decision-support tool.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Gharbi & Jean-Pierre Kenné & Armel Leonel Kuegoua Takengny & Morad Assid, 2024. "Joint Emission-Dependent Optimal Production and Preventive Maintenance Policies of a Deteriorating Manufacturing System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-23, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:14:p:6146-:d:1437927
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/14/6146/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/14/6146/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiting Gong & Sean X. Zhou, 2013. "Optimal Production Planning with Emissions Trading," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(4), pages 908-924, August.
    2. Sadok Turki & Nidhal Rezg, 2018. "Impact of the Quality of Returned-Used Products on the Optimal Design of a Manufacturing/Remanufacturing System under Carbon Emissions Constraints," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-21, September.
    3. Brouhle, Keith & Griffiths, Charles & Wolverton, Ann, 2009. "Evaluating the role of EPA policy levers: An examination of a voluntary program and regulatory threat in the metal-finishing industry," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 166-181, March.
    4. Behnamfar, Reza & Sajadi, Seyed Mojtaba & Tootoonchy, Mahshid, 2022. "Developing environmental hedging point policy with variable demand: A machine learning approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    5. Xiaojun Pan & Shoude Li, 2015. "Optimal control of a stochastic production–inventory system under deteriorating items and environmental constraints," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(2), pages 607-628, January.
    6. Jun Yang & Houmina Yan & M.I. Taksar, 2000. "Optimal Production and Setup Scheduling: A One-Machine, Two-Product System," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 98(1), pages 291-311, December.
    7. A. Ben-Salem & A. Gharbi & A. Hajji, 2015. "An Environmental Hedging Point Policy to control production rate and emissions in unreliable manufacturing systems," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(2), pages 435-450, January.
    8. Cheng, Guo Qing & Zhou, Bing Hai & Li, Ling, 2018. "Integrated production, quality control and condition-based maintenance for imperfect production systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 251-264.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jean-Pierre Kenné & Ali Gharbi & Armel Leonel Kuegoua Takengny & Morad Assid, 2024. "Optimal Control Policy of Unreliable Production Systems Generating Greenhouse Gas Emission," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Patrick Zschech & Kai Heinrich & Raphael Bink & Janis S. Neufeld, 2019. "Prognostic Model Development with Missing Labels," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 61(3), pages 327-343, June.
    3. Shuai Jin & Yifei Niu & Liuwei Zhao, 2022. "Optimal purchase planning of initial emission permits with the paid use and trading system based on mean–variance model," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 2409-2420, September.
    4. Kube, Roland & von Graevenitz, Kathrine & Löschel, Andreas & Massier, Philipp, 2019. "Do voluntary environmental programs reduce emissions? EMAS in the German manufacturing sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(S1).
    5. Yenipazarli, Arda, 2016. "Managing new and remanufactured products to mitigate environmental damage under emissions regulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(1), pages 117-130.
    6. Pham, An & Jin, Tongdan & Novoa, Clara & Qin, Jin, 2019. "A multi-site production and microgrid planning model for net-zero energy operations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 260-274.
    7. Wen, Wen & Zhou, P. & Zhang, Fuqiang, 2018. "Carbon emissions abatement: Emissions trading vs consumer awareness," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 34-47.
    8. Daozhi Zhao & Jiaqin Hao & Cejun Cao & Hongshuai Han, 2019. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of Three-Player for Low-Carbon Production Capacity Sharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-20, May.
    9. Lin Wang & Zhiqiang Lu & Yifei Ren, 2019. "A rolling horizon approach for production planning and condition-based maintenance under uncertain demand," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(6), pages 1014-1028, December.
    10. Xu, Xiaoping & He, Ping & Xu, Hao & Zhang, Quanpeng, 2017. "Supply chain coordination with green technology under cap-and-trade regulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PB), pages 433-442.
    11. Konur, Dinçer & Campbell, James F. & Monfared, Sepideh A., 2017. "Economic and environmental considerations in a stochastic inventory control model with order splitting under different delivery schedules among suppliers," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 46-65.
    12. Jiang, Jingjing & Xie, Dejun & Ye, Bin & Shen, Bo & Chen, Zhanming, 2016. "Research on China’s cap-and-trade carbon emission trading scheme: Overview and outlook," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 902-917.
    13. Liuwei, Zhao & Shuai, Jin & Hongyun, Jiang, 2024. "Complex dynamics of dual oligopoly demand uncertainty under carbon emission trading mechanism," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    14. Christopher Sprague & Jeffrey Wagner, 2018. "Economic Motivations for Software Bug Bounties," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 38(1), pages 550-557.
    15. Behnamfar, Reza & Sajadi, Seyed Mojtaba & Tootoonchy, Mahshid, 2022. "Developing environmental hedging point policy with variable demand: A machine learning approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    16. Xu, Xiaoping & He, Ping & Zhou, Li & Cheng, T.C.E., 2023. "Coordination of a platform-based supply chain in the marketplace or reselling mode considering cross-channel effect and blockchain technology," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(1), pages 170-187.
    17. Jiafu Su & Chi Li & Qingjun Zeng & Jiaquan Yang & Jie Zhang, 2019. "A Green Closed-Loop Supply Chain Coordination Mechanism Based on Third-Party Recycling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-14, September.
    18. Ma, Xin & Talluri, Srinivas & Ferguson, Mark & Tiwari, Sunil, 2022. "Strategic production and responsible sourcing decisions under an emissions trading scheme," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(3), pages 1429-1443.
    19. Yu, Dejian & Xu, Chao, 2017. "Mapping research on carbon emissions trading: a co-citation analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1314-1322.
    20. Ji, Jingna & Li, Tao & Yang, Lei, 2023. "Pricing and carbon reduction strategies for vertically differentiated firms under Cap-and-Trade regulation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:14:p:6146-:d:1437927. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.