IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i14p6106-d1437135.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban Regeneration Assessment in Castilla and León (Spain): A Comparative Study of Proposals in Homogeneous Residential Neighborhoods Built Up during Developmentalism

Author

Listed:
  • M. Almudena Frechilla-Alonso

    (Department of Construction and Agronomy, Universidad de Salamanca, Av. Cardenal Cisneros 34, 49029 Zamora, Spain)

  • M. Ascensión Rodríguez-Esteban

    (Department of Construction and Agronomy, Universidad de Salamanca, Av. Cardenal Cisneros 34, 49029 Zamora, Spain)

  • Ana B. Ramos-Gavilán

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universidad de Salamanca, Av. Cardenal Cisneros 34, 49029 Zamora, Spain)

  • Aitor C. Raposeiras

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universidad de Salamanca, Av. Cardenal Cisneros 34, 49029 Zamora, Spain)

  • Diana Movilla-Quesada

    (Department of Construction and Agronomy, Universidad de Salamanca, Av. Cardenal Cisneros 34, 49029 Zamora, Spain)

Abstract

Urban regeneration is perceived as an efficient solution addressing multiple problems in today’s cities, offering answers to the social, economic, physical, and environmental challenges faced by consolidated fabrics. This paper utilizes the assessment tool developed in the Urban Regeneration Strategy of Castilla and León to conduct a comparative analysis of proposals formulated since 2014 in neighborhoods built after the Spanish Civil War in this region. The aim is to validate the effectiveness of this methodology to establish the quality and sustainability of these initiatives and to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the cases analyzed. The results obtained endorse the operability of this evaluation process since it makes it possible to assess the scope of the planned measures at an early stage. This makes it possible to introduce improvements during the implementation phase or in future interventions, which will have a positive impact on their outcome. In any case, it is necessary to complement this study with analyses at later stages in order to establish an overall diagnosis of the real relevance of these operations.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Almudena Frechilla-Alonso & M. Ascensión Rodríguez-Esteban & Ana B. Ramos-Gavilán & Aitor C. Raposeiras & Diana Movilla-Quesada, 2024. "Urban Regeneration Assessment in Castilla and León (Spain): A Comparative Study of Proposals in Homogeneous Residential Neighborhoods Built Up during Developmentalism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:14:p:6106-:d:1437135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/14/6106/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/14/6106/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yizhong Chen & Guiwen Liu & Taozhi Zhuang, 2022. "Evaluating the Comprehensive Benefit of Urban Renewal Projects on the Area Scale: An Integrated Method," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-20, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yawei Du & Qing Ye & Hongjiang Liu & Yuting Wu & Fenghua Wang, 2023. "Sustainable Assessment Tools for Higher Education Institutions: Developing Two-Hierarchy Tools for China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-22, July.
    2. Shiyuan He & Yu Li, 2024. "Understanding Impacts of Neighbourhood Micro-Renewal Through a Lens of Place Value: A Case Study of Wuhan, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, November.
    3. Yujia Zhu & Jusheng Song & Yunxi Bai, 2024. "China’s Urban Regeneration Evolution from 1949 to 2022: From the Perspective of Governance Mode," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-29, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:14:p:6106-:d:1437135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.