IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i14p6037-d1435553.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contributions of Different Perennial Grass Species and Their Roots’ Characteristics to Soil Organic Carbon Accumulation

Author

Listed:
  • Aida Skersiene

    (Institute of Agriculture, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, LT-58344 Akademija, Lithuania)

  • Alvyra Slepetiene

    (Institute of Agriculture, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, LT-58344 Akademija, Lithuania)

  • Vaclovas Stukonis

    (Institute of Agriculture, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, LT-58344 Akademija, Lithuania)

  • Egle Norkeviciene

    (Institute of Agriculture, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, LT-58344 Akademija, Lithuania)

Abstract

Growing perennial grasses is often cited as one of the possible and most affordable solutions for mitigating climate change. This practice is also recommended for sustainable soil management in agriculture. Our experiment involved timothy grass ( Phleum pratense L.), red clover ( Trifolium pratense L.), and their mixture; tall oat grass ( Arrhenatherum elatius L.), alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.), and their mixture, with the aim of diversifying the annual rotation; and periodical, twice-per-season cultivated plots in the same area (the bare soil fallow). Soil samples were collected in late October after plant vegetation’s first, second, and third growth years from three field replicates at the soil layers 0–0.1 m, 0.1–0.2 m, and 0.2–0.3 m and plant roots—at the beginning of November in the second cultivation year. After three years, the SOC content increased in all the study areas occupied by plants, regardless of their species composition, while it decreased in fallow plots. Grass roots were characterized by the highest C/N ratio (38.2 and 45.5). The roots of the red clover–timothy grass mixture also reached a C/N ratio greater than 30. Based on our research, choosing a combination of at least two plants, such as legumes and grasses, is possibly more effective for enriching the soil with carbon compounds in a short period.

Suggested Citation

  • Aida Skersiene & Alvyra Slepetiene & Vaclovas Stukonis & Egle Norkeviciene, 2024. "Contributions of Different Perennial Grass Species and Their Roots’ Characteristics to Soil Organic Carbon Accumulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-16, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:14:p:6037-:d:1435553
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/14/6037/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/14/6037/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Derek G Groenendyk & Ty PA Ferré & Kelly R Thorp & Amy K Rice, 2015. "Hydrologic-Process-Based Soil Texture Classifications for Improved Visualization of Landscape Function," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Albert Moerkerken & Julia Blasch & Pieter Beukering & Erik Well, 2020. "A new approach to explain farmers’ adoption of climate change mitigation measures," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 141-161, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Theodoros Skevas & Ray Massey & Jasper Grashuis, 2022. "Farmer adoption and intensity of use of extreme weather adaptation and mitigation strategies: evidence from a sample of Missouri farmers," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 174(1), pages 1-23, September.
    2. J Blasch & B van der Kroon & P van Beukering & R Munster & S Fabiani & P Nino & S Vanino, 2022. "Farmer preferences for adopting precision farming technologies: a case study from Italy," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 49(1), pages 33-81.
    3. Junqiao Ma & Wenfeng Zhou & Shili Guo & Xin Deng & Jiahao Song & Dingde Xu, 2022. "The influence of peer effects on farmers’ response to climate change: evidence from Sichuan Province, China," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 1-23, November.
    4. Behrendt, Karl & Paparas, Dimitrios, 2021. "Proceedings of the 4th Symposium on Agri-Tech Economics for Sustainable Futures, 20th – 21st September 2021, Harper Adams University, Newport, United Kingdom," Agri-Tech Economics Proceedings 316594, Harper Adams University, Land, Farm & Agribusiness Management Department.
    5. Monteleone, Beatrice & Borzí, Iolanda & Bonaccorso, Brunella & Martina, Mario, 2022. "Developing stage-specific drought vulnerability curves for maize: The case study of the Po River basin," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    6. Kanat Samarkhanov & Jilili Abuduwaili & Alim Samat & Yongxiao Ge & Wen Liu & Long Ma & Zhassulan Smanov & Gabit Adamin & Azamat Yershibul & Zhassulan Sadykov, 2022. "Dimensionality-Transformed Remote Sensing Data Application to Map Soil Salinization at Lowlands of the Syr Darya River," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    7. Federica Ghilardi & Andrea Virano & Marco Prandi & Enrico Borgogno-Mondino, 2023. "Zonation of a Viticultural Territorial Context in Piemonte (NW Italy) to Support Terroir Identification: The Role of Pedological, Topographical and Climatic Factors," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-24, March.
    8. Aida Skersiene & Alvyra Slepetiene & Vaclovas Stukonis & Egle Norkeviciene, 2023. "Accumulation of SOC and Carbon Fractions in Different Age Red Fescue Permanent Swards," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-13, May.
    9. Behrendt, Karl & Paparas, Dimitrios, 2021. "Proceedings of the 4th Symposium on Agri-Tech Economics for Sustainable Futures, 20th – 21st September 2021, Harper Adams University, Newport, United Kingdom," Land, Farm & Agribusiness Management Department 316594, Harper Adams University, Land, Farm & Agribusiness Management Department.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:14:p:6037-:d:1435553. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.