IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i13p5794-d1430896.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Communicative Framework Development for Construction Risk Governance: An Analysis of Risk and Trust Perception for Organizational Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Katrina Hinsberg

    (School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA)

  • Majia Nadesan

    (School of Social Behavioral Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA)

  • Anthony Lamanna

    (Del E. Webb School of Construction, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA)

Abstract

In the construction industry, risk governance stems from the standardization of safety policies and procedures. Safety governance is typically communicated and enforced through a top-down, command-and-control approach. Procedures and policies are created at the top level and cascaded down to the work. Individual discretion in the workplace permits a choice for worker adherence to safety procedures. Through a literature review, this study identified risk perception as a significant variable in regulatory compliance and fidelity. Individual hazard assessments and risk behaviors are often based on subjective cognitive risk perceptions rather than organizational governance policy. In the current governance system, there is a misalignment of risk perceptions and failure in trust between the workforce and the regulatory process. This study examines the impact of risk perceptions on safety compliance and promotes a more participative risk governance process for sustainable construction practices. A participative framework model is proposed to help align worker risk perceptions with organizational governance through policy creation, policy compliance and stakeholder participation and feedback. Utilizing proper discourse and cyclical communication, the proposed framework aims to increase safety fidelity, compliance, and trust in the construction industry through a more inclusive and collaborative governance strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Katrina Hinsberg & Majia Nadesan & Anthony Lamanna, 2024. "Communicative Framework Development for Construction Risk Governance: An Analysis of Risk and Trust Perception for Organizational Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-21, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5794-:d:1430896
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5794/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5794/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stacey M. Conchie & Calvin Burns, 2009. "Improving occupational safety: using a trusted information source to communicate about risk," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 13-25, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5794-:d:1430896. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.