Author
Listed:
- Richard Guillermo Vásconez Garcia
(Center for Energy and Petroleum Studies (CEPETRO), State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas 13083-896, SP, Brazil
Department of Geology and Natural Resources, Geosciences Institute (IG), State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas 13083-855, SP, Brazil
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- SeyedMehdi Mohammadizadeh
(Department of Water Resources (DRH), College of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Urban Design (FECFAU), State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas 13083-852, SP, Brazil
Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Sistan and Baluchestan (USB), Zahedan 98155-987, Iran
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Michelle Chaves Kuroda Avansi
(Center for Energy and Petroleum Studies (CEPETRO), State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas 13083-896, SP, Brazil)
- Giorgio Basilici
(Department of Geology and Natural Resources, Geosciences Institute (IG), State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas 13083-855, SP, Brazil
Centro Regional de Investigaciones Científicas y Transferencia Tecnologica de La Rioja (Prov. de La Rioja-UNLaR-SEGEMAR-UNCa-CONICET), Anillaco, Entre Ríos y Mendoza sn, La Rioja 5301, Argentina)
- Leticia da Silva Bomfim
(Center for Energy and Petroleum Studies (CEPETRO), State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas 13083-896, SP, Brazil)
- Oton Rubio Cunha
(Center for Energy and Petroleum Studies (CEPETRO), State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas 13083-896, SP, Brazil)
- Marcus Vinícius Theodoro Soares
(Center for Energy and Petroleum Studies (CEPETRO), State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas 13083-896, SP, Brazil)
- Áquila Ferreira Mesquita
(Center for Energy and Petroleum Studies (CEPETRO), State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas 13083-896, SP, Brazil)
- Seyed Kourosh Mahjour
(Texas Institute for Applied Environment Research, Tarleton State University, Stephenville, TX 76401, USA)
- Alexandre Campane Vidal
(Center for Energy and Petroleum Studies (CEPETRO), State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas 13083-896, SP, Brazil
Department of Geology and Natural Resources, Geosciences Institute (IG), State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas 13083-855, SP, Brazil)
Abstract
Carbonate reservoirs, influenced by depositional and diagenetic processes and characterized by features like faults and vugs that impact storage capacity, require more than traditional Borehole Imaging logs ( B H I s ) for accurate porosity data. These data are essential for geological assessments, production forecasting, and reservoir simulations. This work aims to address this limitation by developing methods to measure and monitor the sustainability of carbonate reservoirs and exploring the application of sustainability principles to their management. The study integrates B H I s and conventional logs from two wells to classify porosity-based facies within the Barra Velha Formation ( B V F ) in the Santos Basin. The methodology involves four steps: (i) analyzing conventional logs; (ii) segmenting BHI logs; (iii) integrating conventional and segmented BHI logs using Self-Organizing Maps ( S O M ); and (iv) interpreting the resulting classes. Matrix porosity values and non-matrix pore sizes categorize the porosity into four facies: ( A to D ). The results of this research indicate the following: Facies A has high non-matrix porosity with 14,560 small megapores, 5419 large megapores, and 271 gigapores (71.9%, 26.76%, and 1.34% of the 20,250 pores, respectively). Facies B shows moderate non-matrix porosity with 8,669 small megapores, 2642 large megapores, and 33 gigapores (76.42%, 23.29%, and 0.29% of the 11,344 pores, respectively) and medium matrix porosity. Facies C exhibits low non-matrix porosity with 7749 small megapores, 2132 large megapores, and 20 gigapores (78.27%, 21.53%, and 0.20% of the 9901 pores, respectively) and medium matrix porosity. Facies D has low non-matrix porosity with 9355 small megapores, 2346 large megapores, and 19 gigapores (79.82%, 20.02%, and 0.16% of the 11,720 pores, respectively) and low matrix porosity. The results of this research reveal the effectiveness of a semiautomatic methodology that combines B H I and conventional well logs to distinguish between matrix and non-matrix-related pore spaces, thus enabling a preliminary classification of reservoir facies based on porosity. This study advances our understanding of carbonate reservoir sustainability and heterogeneity, thus offering valuable insights for robust, sustainable reservoir characterization and management in the context of global environmental and geological changes. The novelty of this work lies in integrating data from two sources to classify porosity across the presalt reservoir interval, thus serving as a proxy for preliminary lithofacies identification without core data.
Suggested Citation
Richard Guillermo Vásconez Garcia & SeyedMehdi Mohammadizadeh & Michelle Chaves Kuroda Avansi & Giorgio Basilici & Leticia da Silva Bomfim & Oton Rubio Cunha & Marcus Vinícius Theodoro Soares & Áquila, 2024.
"Geological Insights from Porosity Analysis for Sustainable Development of Santos Basin’s Presalt Carbonate Reservoir,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-35, July.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5730-:d:1429053
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Qiquan Ran & Xin Zhou & Mengya Xu & Jiaxin Dong & Dianxing Ren & Ruibo Li, 2023.
"Research on the Fracture Propagation Law of Separate Layered Fracturing in Unconventional Sandstone Reservoirs,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-19, July.
- Weihua Chen & Jian Yang & Li Li & Hancheng Wang & Lei Huang & Yucheng Jia & Qiuyun Hu & Xingwen Jiang & Jizhou Tang, 2023.
"Investigation of Mechanical Properties Evolution and Crack Initiation Mechanisms of Deep Carbonate Rocks Affected by Acid Erosion,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-17, August.
- Yihan Xing & Huiting Yang & Wei Yu, 2023.
"An Approach for the Classification of Rock Types Using Machine Learning of Core and Log Data,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, May.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5730-:d:1429053. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.