IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i13p5657-d1427613.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empirical Research on Factors Influencing Chinese Farmers’ Adoption of Green Production Technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaojuan Fan

    (College of Public Administration, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 271018, China)

  • Guanghui Meng

    (College of Economics and Management, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 271018, China)

  • Qingming Zhang

    (School of Law, Shandong University of Technology, Taian 271000, China)

Abstract

During a critical period of structural reform in China’s agricultural supply chain, accelerating the promotion and application of green production technologies emerges as a pivotal strategy to ensure the quality and safety of agricultural products while advancing agricultural modernization. This study empirically examines the factors influencing farmers’ adoption of green production technologies using an ordered logistic model based on survey data collected from 533 respondents in Shandong Province. The survey targeted regions where major economic crops such as corn and soybeans are cultivated, employing simple random sampling to ensure the data’s representativeness and reliability. The findings underscore several critical factors influencing farmers’ willingness to adopt green production technologies, including the presence of quality inspections, evaluations of restrictions on prohibited pesticide use, sales performance of green products, availability of government subsidies, and traceability of agricultural products. To foster greater adoption of green production technologies and propel the transformation of China’s agriculture, it is recommended to advocate and guide green agricultural practices, enhance green agricultural subsidy policies, and strengthen agricultural product market management systems. These measures are essential for ensuring sustainable agricultural development in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaojuan Fan & Guanghui Meng & Qingming Zhang, 2024. "Empirical Research on Factors Influencing Chinese Farmers’ Adoption of Green Production Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-13, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5657-:d:1427613
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5657/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5657/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chouinard, Hayley H. & Wandschneider, Philip R. & Paterson, Tobias, 2016. "Inferences from sparse data: An integrated, meta-utility approach to conservation research," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 71-78.
    2. Jeff Savage & Marc Ribaudo, 2016. "Improving the Efficiency of Voluntary Water Quality Conservation Programs," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 92(1), pages 148-166.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tingting Liu & Randall J. F. Bruins & Matthew T. Heberling, 2018. "Factors Influencing Farmers’ Adoption of Best Management Practices: A Review and Synthesis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-26, February.
    2. Bopp, C. & Engler, A. & Poortvliet, M. & Jara-Rojas, R., 2018. "Soil conservation behavior among annual crop farmers: the moderating role of intrinsic on extrinsic motivations," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277300, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Han, Guang & Niles, Meredith T., 2023. "An adoption spectrum for sustainable agriculture practices: A new framework applied to cover crop adoption," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    4. Margarita Velandia & Roderick Rejesus & Christopher Clark & Karen L. DeLong & Annette Wszelaki & Susan Schexnayder & Kimberly Jensen, 2020. "Evaluating the Relationship between Fruit and Vegetable Growers Use of Plastic Biodegradable Mulches, and Environmental Stewardship and Labor Savings: The Case of Tennessee Fruit and Vegetable Farmers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, March.
    5. Hansen, Line Block & Termansen, Mette & Hasler, Berit, 2017. "Effectiveness Of Markets In Nitrogen Abatement: A Danish Case Study," 2017 International Congress, August 28-September 1, 2017, Parma, Italy 260887, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Li, Tongzhe & Fooks, Jacob R. & Messer, Kent D. & Ferraro, Paul J., 2021. "A field experiment to estimate the effects of anchoring and framing on residents’ willingness to purchase water runoff management technologies," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    7. Fleming, Patrick & Lichtenberg, Erik & Newburn, David, 2018. "Water Quality Trading Program Design with Heterogeneous Behavioral Responses," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274429, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    8. Kim, Youngho & Lichtenberg, Erik & Newburn, David, 2022. "Payments and Penalties in Ecosystem Services Programs," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322103, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    9. Thompson, Nathanael M. & Reeling, Carson J. & Fleckenstein, Michelle R. & Prokopy, Linda S. & Armstrong, Shalamar D., 2021. "Examining intensity of conservation practice adoption: Evidence from cover crop use on U.S. Midwest farms," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    10. repec:ags:aaea22:335650 is not listed on IDEAS

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5657-:d:1427613. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.