IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i13p5425-d1422689.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Six Business Model Types for Circular Building Component Reuse Actors

Author

Listed:
  • Bailey Bestul

    (Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, Julianalaan 134, 2628 BL Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Vincent Gruis

    (Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, Julianalaan 134, 2628 BL Delft, The Netherlands)

Abstract

While circular business models are receiving increasing academic attention, the business models of real circular building companies remain underexamined. This paper builds upon existing conceptual proposals and general overviews of reuse actors to investigate how these organizations capture and create value within the constraints of the marketplace. Using data from case studies of 25 organizations involved in the reuse of construction waste streams, the business model of each case is described and compared using Osterwalder and Pigneur’s Business Model Canvas. The authors propose six categories of circular construction business model types: upcyclers, component-specific suppliers, material resellers, reuse platforms, reuse consulting offices and deconstruction companies. The key findings include the studied organizations’ consolidation of multiple waste and new product streams, the strategic minimization of hard assets, the cultivation of diverse revenue streams and an emphasis on private market solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Bailey Bestul & Vincent Gruis, 2024. "Six Business Model Types for Circular Building Component Reuse Actors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-21, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5425-:d:1422689
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5425/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5425/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abbas Tafti & Marcus Sandberg & Matts Andersson, 2024. "Exploring Alternative Revenue Models for Construction Consulting Firms in the Digital Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-29, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5425-:d:1422689. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.