IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i13p5298-d1419768.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Traditional Village Spatial Differentiation from the Perspective of Cultural Routes: A Case Study of 338 Villages in the Miao Frontier Corridor

Author

Listed:
  • Weiqi Zhao

    (School of Architecture, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China)

  • Dawei Xiao

    (School of Architecture, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
    State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building and Urban Science, Guangzhou 510640, China)

  • Jing Li

    (Faculty of Architecture and City Planning, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China)

  • Ziyu Xu

    (Finegold Alexander Architects, Boston, MA 02139, USA)

  • Jin Tao

    (School of Architecture, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
    State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building and Urban Science, Guangzhou 510640, China)

Abstract

The traditional villages in the Miao Frontier Corridor are the products of migrations, social interactions, and transportation, as well as production interchanges between the central plains and the frontiers of China in ancient times. They have made significant contributions to local multicultural inheritance and regional social development. However, with the increasing pressure of heritage conservation and sustainable development, there is growing attention on how traditional villages can tap into their cultural continuity and distinctiveness. This study introduces the concept of cultural routes, with the aim of integrating traditional villages of different ethnicities, regions, and characteristics from the perspective of diversity. It analyzes their spatial differentiation characteristics and the factors influencing them, providing basic support for the overall protection of traditional villages with special characteristics. Following this idea, 338 remaining traditional villages in the Miao Frontier Corridor were selected as the research objects. With the help of 91-satellite maps and a geographic information system (GIS), a cultural and geographic database of the traditional villages in the Miao Frontier Corridor was constructed to objectively explore the roles of the traditional villages’ natural geography, historical, and humanistic elements in the spatial categorization on a large scale. This study shows that the spatial distribution of the traditional villages in the Miao Frontier Corridor is uneven, exhibiting a cluster structure with of a “single primary nucleus with multiple secondary nuclei”. The spatial differentiation of traditional villages exhibits a similar clustering pattern based on individual natural geographic factors, such as elevation, mountain undulation, slope, and water systems. Additionally, there is discernible regularity concerning historical and humanistic factors, such as ethnicity type, age of village establishment, and the presence of guard stations. Further exploring the micro-spatial level, the natural geographical environment serves as the structural foundation of traditional village space, while the historical and humanistic environment fosters multiple differentiations in traditional village space in terms of influencing factors. Together, these factors jointly influence the spatial differentiation of traditional villages. This study enriches the dynamic aspects of linear cultural heritage preservation and also provides new insights into the specialized development within the overall protection of traditional villages.

Suggested Citation

  • Weiqi Zhao & Dawei Xiao & Jing Li & Ziyu Xu & Jin Tao, 2024. "Research on Traditional Village Spatial Differentiation from the Perspective of Cultural Routes: A Case Study of 338 Villages in the Miao Frontier Corridor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-32, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5298-:d:1419768
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5298/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5298/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hai-fan Wang & Shang-chia Chiou, 2019. "Study on the Sustainable Development of Human Settlement Space Environment in Traditional Villages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Jun Zhang & Runni Zhang & Qilun Li & Xue Zhang & Xiong He, 2023. "Spatial Sifferentiation and Differentiated Development Paths of Traditional Villages in Yunnan Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Yong Lu & Yahaya Ahmad, 2023. "Heritage Protection Perspective of Sustainable Development of Traditional Villages in Guangxi, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-23, February.
    4. Zijie Zhou & Xin Zheng, 2022. "A Cultural Route Perspective on Rural Revitalization of Traditional Villages: A Case Study from Chishui, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-23, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haoran Su & Yaowu Wang & Zhen Zhang & Wen Dong, 2022. "Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Traditional Village Distribution in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-26, September.
    2. Geng, Yuqing & Liu, Liwen & Chen, Lingyan, 2023. "Rural revitalization of China: A new framework, measurement and forecast," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    3. Eleni Oikonomopoulou & Ekaterini T. Delegou & John Sayas & Anastasia Vythoulka & Antonia Moropoulou, 2023. "Preservation of Cultural Landscape as a Tool for the Sustainable Development of Rural Areas: The Case of Mani Peninsula in Greece," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-39, August.
    4. Jinyu Fan & Bohong Zheng & Boyang Zhang & Zongsheng Huang & Junyou Liu, 2023. "Research on the Revitalization Path of Ethnic Villages Based on the Inheritance of Spatial Cultural Genes—Taking Tujia Village of Feng Xiang Xi in Guizhou Province as a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-14, January.
    5. Jun Zhang & Runni Zhang & Qilun Li & Xue Zhang & Xiong He, 2023. "Spatial Sifferentiation and Differentiated Development Paths of Traditional Villages in Yunnan Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, August.
    6. Yang Liu & Jiajun Qiao & Jie Xiao & Dong Han & Tao Pan, 2022. "Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Rural Revitalization and an Improvement Path: A Typical Old Revolutionary Cultural Area as an Example," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-24, October.
    7. Wenjun Li & Peng Li & Zhiming Feng & Chiwei Xiao, 2022. "GIS-Based Modeling of Human Settlement Suitability for the Belt and Road Regions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-17, May.
    8. Lili Liu & Meng Chen & Pingping Luo & Maochuan Hu & Weili Duan & Ahmed Elbeltagi, 2023. "A Novel Integrated Spatiotemporal-Variable Model of Landscape Changes in Traditional Villages in the Jinshaan Gorge, Yellow River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-28, August.
    9. Tieqiao Xiao & Lanlan Sheng & Shaojie Zhang & Licheng Zheng & Taotao Shui, 2023. "Thermal Comfort Improvement Strategies for Outdoor Spaces in Traditional Villages Based on ENVI-Met: Shimengao Village in Chizhou City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-19, July.
    10. Yanpeng Ding & Bin Shi & Guijin Su & Qianqian Li & Jing Meng & Yongjian Jiang & Yi Qin & Lingwen Dai & Shuai Song, 2021. "Assessing Suitability of Human Settlements in High-Altitude Area Using a Comprehensive Index Method: A Case Study of Tibet, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, February.
    11. Xiaohu Liu & Lei Yuan & Gangyi Tan, 2023. "Identification and Hierarchy of Traditional Village Characteristics Based on Concentrated Contiguous Development—Taking 206 Traditional Villages in Hubei Province as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, February.
    12. Han Zou & Chen Chen & Wei Xiao & Lifu Shi, 2022. "Spatial-Temporal Evolution Relationship between Water Systems and Historical Settlement Sites Based on Quantitative Analysis: A Case Study of Hankou in Wuhan, China (1635–1949)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-20, November.
    13. Qinglei Zhao & Guanghui Jiang & Tao Zhou & Wenqiu Ma & Yuting Yang, 2023. "Developing an Evaluation System Suitable for Coastal Rural Houses’ Characteristic Style and Its Inspiration for Rural Revitalization: Case Study of Rongcheng in Shandong Province," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-22, February.
    14. Zhi Qiu & Yi Hua & Binwei Yun & Zhu Wang & Yi Zhou, 2023. "Public Space Planning in Urban Resettlement Community in China: Addressing Diverse Needs of Rural Migrants through Function Programming Based on Architectural Planning Theory," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-26, July.
    15. Boyang Gao & Zhenpei Hu, 2022. "What Affects the Level of Rural Human Settlement? A Case Study of Tibet, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-16, August.
    16. Xiaodong Qu & Yuxi Zhang & Zhenming Li, 2024. "Is China’s Rural Revitalization Good Enough? Evidence from Spatial Agglomeration and Cluster Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-31, May.
    17. Lei Gong & Jianzhu Yang & Chong Wu & Hui Zhou, 2023. "Fractal Characteristics of the Spatial Texture in Traditional Miao Villages in Qiandongnan, Guizhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-23, September.
    18. Chao Wu & Miaomiao Chen & Lei Zhou & Xiaojin Liang & Wei Wang, 2020. "Identifying the Spatiotemporal Patterns of Traditional Villages in China: A Multiscale Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-21, November.
    19. Hai-fan Wang & Shang-chia Chiou, 2019. "Research on the Sustainable Development of Traditional Dwellings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-14, September.
    20. Keyu Hu & Weipin Lin & Liwen Fan & Sisheng Yang & Tiancong Zhang, 2024. "Spatial Differentiation and Influencing Factors of Traditional Villages in Fujian, China: A Watershed Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-20, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5298-:d:1419768. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.