IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i12p5269-d1419101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of CSR Implement Modes on Sustainable Supply Chain Pricing and Green Decision Making

Author

Listed:
  • Wenxia Li

    (School of Traffic and Transportation, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Linzhong Liu

    (School of Traffic and Transportation, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Zhuo Li

    (School of Traffic and Transportation, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

Abstract

Green transformation is an effective way for supply chains to achieve sustainable development. In the heterogeneous substitute product coexistence environment, it is valuable to explore the motivation behind CSR implementation as well as the advantages and differences associated with different members’ CSR implementations. In this study, we consider that the manufacturer produces both green products and ordinary products that are substitutes for each other and construct a CSR-absence scenario (Model N ), a retailer implementing CSR scenario (Model R ), and a manufacturer implementing CSR scenario (Model M ). Applying a game-theory-based method, we obtain the optimal pricing, green decision, and supply chain profit under different scenarios. We analyze the effects of consumers’ green preference, green product function coefficient, and CSR level on decision making and performance. Through comparison and numerical analysis, we find the following: (1) Although the CSR behaviors of the manufacturer and the retailer squeeze the market demand space of the ordinary products, the greenness of the green product increases, and the retail price decreases. This not only enhances the consumer surplus of green products but also increases the profit and social welfare of the supply chain system. (2) The eco-friendliness of green products, product demand, and social welfare levels are the highest when the retailer implements CSR, followed by when the manufacturer implements CSR, and are the lowest in the CSR-absence scenario. In addition, the following retailer can enhance both its and the manufacturer’s profits through implementing CSR within a reasonable range. (3) The numerical analysis results show that, when the functional attributes of the green products meet a certain level, supply chain members implementing CSR does not affect consumers’ choice of green products.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenxia Li & Linzhong Liu & Zhuo Li, 2024. "The Impact of CSR Implement Modes on Sustainable Supply Chain Pricing and Green Decision Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-31, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:12:p:5269-:d:1419101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/12/5269/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/12/5269/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Linghong & Wang, Jingguo & You, Jianxin, 2015. "Consumer environmental awareness and channel coordination with two substitutable products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(1), pages 63-73.
    2. Ahmad Fadavi & Fariborz Jolai & Ata Allah Taleizadeh, 2022. "Green product design in a supply chain with considering marketing under competition and coordination," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(10), pages 11721-11759, October.
    3. Hanbo Wu & Yaxin Sun & Yutong Su & Ming Chen & Hongxia Zhao & Qi Li, 2022. "Which Is the Best Supply Chain Policy: Carbon Tax, or a Low-Carbon Subsidy?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Genhasi Ge & Daoping Wang & Mesumbe Bianca Epede, 2022. "Pricing Policies of Green Dual-Channel Supply Chain with Fairness Concerns and Altruistic Preferences Based on Consumers’ Environmental Awareness and Channel Preference," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-28, October.
    5. Hong, Zhaofu & Wang, Hao & Yu, Yugang, 2018. "Green product pricing with non-green product reference," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 1-15.
    6. Chao-qun Han & Hua-ying Gu & Li-hui Sui & Chang-peng Shao, 2021. "Carbon Emission Reduction Decision and Revenue-Sharing Contract with Consumers’ Low-Carbon Preference and CER Cost under Carbon Tax," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-11, May.
    7. Zhao, Jing & Tang, Wansheng & Wei, Jie, 2012. "Pricing decision for substitutable products with retail competition in a fuzzy environment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 144-153.
    8. Biswas, Indranil & Raj, Alok & Srivastava, Samir K., 2018. "Supply chain channel coordination with triple bottom line approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 213-226.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abhishek Srivastava & Abhishek Chakraborty & Arqum Mateen, 2022. "Role of power imbalance on channel coordination under greening investments," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 59(4), pages 1522-1554, December.
    2. Wang, Zizhuo & Wang, Mingzheng & Liu, Weiwei, 2020. "To introduce competition or not to introduce competition: An analysis of corporate social responsibility investment collaboration in a two-echelon supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    3. Dong, Ciwei & Liu, Qingyu & Shen, Bin, 2019. "To be or not to be green? Strategic investment for green product development in a supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 193-227.
    4. Mukherjee, Arka & Carvalho, Margarida, 2021. "Dynamic decision making in a mixed market under cooperation: Towards sustainability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    5. Du, Shaofu & Wang, Lei & Hu, Li & Zhu, Yangguang, 2019. "Platform-led green advertising: Promote the best or promote by performance," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 115-131.
    6. Huang, Hongfu & Xing, Xinjie & He, Yong & Gu, Xiaoyu, 2020. "Combating greenwashers in emerging markets: A game-theoretical exploration of firms, customers and government regulations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    7. Matsui, Kenji, 2019. "A supply chain member should set its margin later if another member's cost is highly uncertain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(1), pages 127-138.
    8. Govindan, Kannan & Rajeev, A. & Padhi, Sidhartha S. & Pati, Rupesh K., 2020. "Supply chain sustainability and performance of firms: A meta-analysis of the literature," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    9. Awasthy, Prakash & Gouda, Sirish & Ghosh, Debabrata & Swami, Sanjeev, 2022. "Analyzing product greening spillovers in multi-product markets," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    10. Subrata Saha & Zbigniew Banaszak & Grzegorz Bocewicz & Izabela Ewa Nielsen, 2022. "Pricing and quality competition for substitutable green products with a common retailer," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 3713-3746, September.
    11. Jun Wang & Xianxue Cheng & Xinyu Wang & Hongtao Yang & Shuhua Zhang, 2019. "Myopic versus Farsighted Behaviors in a Low-Carbon Supply Chain with Reference Emission Effects," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-15, February.
    12. Kelei Xue & Guohua Sun & Yuyan Wang & Shuiye Niu, 2021. "Optimal Pricing and Green Product Design Strategies in a Sustainable Supply Chain Considering Government Subsidy and Different Channel Power Structures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-26, November.
    13. Ma, Xueli & Mao, Jinyue & Luo, Qian & Bai, Qingguo, 2024. "Effects of information superiority and green optimism on green supply chains under different power structures," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    14. Zongxian Wang & Xiao Li & Weihua Liang & Junhai Ma, 2023. "Does a New Electric Vehicle Manufacturer Have the Incentive for Battery Life Investment? A Study Based on the Game Framework," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-20, August.
    15. Sana, Shib Sankar, 2020. "Price competition between green and non green products under corporate social responsible firm," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    16. Qinghua Feng & Tong Liu, 2022. "Selection Strategy and Coordination of Green Product R&D in Sustainable Competitive Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-22, July.
    17. Agi, Maher A.N. & Yan, Xinghao, 2020. "Greening products in a supply chain under market segmentation and different channel power structures," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    18. Ma, Peng, 2021. "Optimal generic and brand advertising efforts in a decentralized supply chain considering customer surplus," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    19. Linghong Zhang & Bowen Xue & Xiyu Liu, 2018. "Carbon Emission Reduction with Regard to Retailer’s Fairness Concern and Subsidies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-28, April.
    20. Liu, Wenjie & Liu, Wei & Shen, Ningning & Xu, Zhitao & Xie, Naiming & Chen, Jian & Zhou, Huiyu, 2022. "Pricing and collection decisions of a closed-loop supply chain with fuzzy demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:12:p:5269-:d:1419101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.