IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i12p5214-d1417970.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Waste Management in Orthopedic Healthcare Services

Author

Listed:
  • Flaviu Moldovan

    (Orthopedics–Traumatology Department, Faculty of Medicine, “George Emil Palade” University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, 540142 Targu Mures, Romania)

  • Liviu Moldovan

    (Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, “George Emil Palade” University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, 540142 Targu Mures, Romania)

Abstract

It is estimated that globally medical surgical specialties, including orthopedics, produce large amounts of hospital waste. However, the possibilities of recycling materials are not well highlighted. Orthopedic hospitals can collect larger volumes of recyclables that could be kept out of landfills. The general objective of this study is to identify the categories and related amounts of waste and recyclable materials produced by the main types of medical interventions in orthopedics. The specific objective is to evaluate the amounts of waste produced in the preoperative and intraoperative periods, but also their recycling potential. For one month, we analyzed eight types of orthopedic medical interventions, of which five were surgical and three were nonsurgical. These were performed at the County Emergency Clinical Hospital of Targu Mures in Romania. For surgical interventions, the waste was collected separately in the preoperative and intraoperative periods. Waste was divided into recyclable, nonrecyclable, and biological categories. The waste bags were weighed with a portable scale. The main results are the average amounts of recyclable waste produced per case in the eight types of medical interventions. The secondary results show the average amounts per case of nonrecyclable, biological, and total waste. To test for statistically significant differences between the types of medical interventions, we performed an analysis of variance. Seventy-four cases were included in the study. An amount of 466.2 kg of waste was collected, with an average mass of 6.3 kg per case. During the preoperative period, 130.3 kg of waste was produced, of which 78% was recyclable. During the intraoperative period, 303.8 kg of waste was produced and only 11% was recyclable. Trauma surgery produced the largest amount of waste, followed by arthroplasty. A quarter of orthopedic waste is recyclable, and the greatest potential for recycling is preoperative waste, which can be effectively recycled at three-quarters. Through effective recycling programs, the ecological footprint of orthopedic–traumatology interventions can be reduced.

Suggested Citation

  • Flaviu Moldovan & Liviu Moldovan, 2024. "Sustainable Waste Management in Orthopedic Healthcare Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-13, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:12:p:5214-:d:1417970
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/12/5214/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/12/5214/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anastasios Sepetis & Paraskevi N. Zaza & Fotios Rizos & Pantelis G. Bagos, 2022. "Identifying and Predicting Healthcare Waste Management Costs for an Optimal Sustainable Management System: Evidence from the Greek Public Sector," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-20, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alla Mostepaniuk & Turgay Akalin & Mohammad Reza Parish, 2023. "Practices Pursuing the Sustainability of A Healthcare Organization: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Poornima A. Jayasinghe & Hamoun Jalilzadeh & Patrick Hettiaratchi, 2023. "The Impact of COVID-19 on Waste Infrastructure: Lessons Learned and Opportunities for a Sustainable Future," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-14, February.
    3. Tiberia Ioana Ilias & Cristian Sergiu Hocopan & Roxana Brata & Ovidiu Fratila, 2023. "Current and Future Sustainability Traits of Digestive Endoscopy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-17, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:12:p:5214-:d:1417970. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.