IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i12p5151-d1416552.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Evaluating the Characteristics of the Rural Landscape of Zhanqi Village, Chengdu, China, Based on Oblique Aerial Photography by Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

Author

Listed:
  • Chunyan Zhu

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Rong Li

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Jinming Luo

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Xi Li

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Juan Du

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Jun Ma

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Chaoping Hou

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Weizhen Zeng

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

Abstract

To achieve the transition of rural areas from traditional to modern, the visualization of rural landscape data and feature evaluations are essential. Landscape character assessment (LCA) is a well-established tool that was developed to assess and understand rural landscape features. In recent years, drones have become increasingly attractive for various applications and services due to their low costs and relative ease of operation. Unlike most previous studies that relied solely on drone-based remote sensing or visual esthetic evaluations, this study proposes an innovative assessment method based on landscape characteristic assessment (LCA) and oblique drone photography technology, supported by specific data and survey results. These include various landscape metrics, such as the Shannon diversity index (SHDI), Shannon evenness index (SHEI), vegetation coverage, landscape character zoning, and delineations of various ecologically sensitive areas. This method was applied to study Zhanqi Village in Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China and revealed some unique characteristics of this village. By categorizing and describing the landscape features, the study makes judgments and decisions about them. This is a beneficial attempt to apply the scientific methods of landscape assessments to the production management of aerial drone surveys. This method provides a comprehensive framework for evaluating rural landscape features and demonstrates that the combination of LCA and oblique drone photography technology is feasible for rural landscape research. Additionally, this study emphasizes the need for further research to explore the potential application of this method in continuously evolving urban and rural environments in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Chunyan Zhu & Rong Li & Jinming Luo & Xi Li & Juan Du & Jun Ma & Chaoping Hou & Weizhen Zeng, 2024. "Research on Evaluating the Characteristics of the Rural Landscape of Zhanqi Village, Chengdu, China, Based on Oblique Aerial Photography by Unmanned Aerial Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-23, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:12:p:5151-:d:1416552
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/12/5151/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/12/5151/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nikola Cvetković & Aleksandar Đoković & Milan Dobrota & Milan Radojičić, 2023. "New Methodology for Corn Stress Detection Using Remote Sensing and Vegetation Indices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-12, March.
    2. Vesna Rajčević & Tanja Mišlicki Tomić & Irena Medar-Tanjga & Mlađen Trifunović & Neda Živak & Aleksandra Petrašević, 2023. "The Role of Landscape in Sustainable Tourism Development—A Study of Identification and Evaluation of Landscape Qualities of the Vrbanja Basin in Bosnia and Herzegovina," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Yuefeng Lu & Zhenqi Song & Yuqing Li & Zhichao An & Lan Zhao & Guosheng Zan & Miao Lu, 2023. "A Novel Desert Vegetation Extraction and Shadow Separation Method Based on Visible Light Images from Unmanned Aerial Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    4. Andrew Butler, 2016. "Dynamics of integrating landscape values in landscape character assessment: the hidden dominance of the objective outsider," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(2), pages 239-252, February.
    5. Fiona Nevzati & Martti Veldi & Mart Külvik & Simon Bell, 2023. "Analysis of Landscape Character Assessment and Cultural Ecosystem Services Evaluation Frameworks for Peri-Urban Landscape Planning: A Case Study of Harku Municipality, Estonia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rocío Silva-Pérez & Gema González-Romero, 2022. "GIAHS as an Instrument to Articulate the Landscape and Territorialized Agrifood Systems—The Example of La Axarquía (Malaga Province, Spain)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Zizhen Hong & Wentao Cao & Ying Chen & Sijia Zhu & Wenjun Zheng, 2024. "Identifying Rural Landscape Heritage Character Types and Areas: A Case Study of the Li River Basin in Guilin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-24, February.
    3. Shuchang Li & Jinshi Zhang, 2024. "Landscape Character Identification and Zoning Management in Disaster-Prone Mountainous Areas: A Case Study of Mentougou District, Beijing," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Theano S. Terkenli & Aikaterini Gkoltsiou & Dimitris Kavroudakis, 2021. "The Interplay of Objectivity and Subjectivity in Landscape Character Assessment: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches and Challenges," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Andrew Lothian, 2022. "Visual Resource Stewardship—An International Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-38, March.
    6. Yingxue Wang & Jiaheng Du & Jingxing Kuang & Chunxu Chen & Maobiao Li & Jin Wang, 2023. "Two-Scaled Identification of Landscape Character Types and Areas: A Case Study of the Yunnan–Vietnam Railway (Yunnan Section), China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, April.
    7. Joanna T. Storie & Enri Uusna & Zane Eglāja & Teele Laur & Mart Külvik & Monika Suškevičs & Simon Bell, 2019. "Place Attachment and Its Consequence for Landscape-Scale Management and Readiness to Participate: Social Network Complexity in the Post-Soviet Rural Context of Latvia and Estonia," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-24, August.
    8. Maria Gabriella Trovato & Dana Ali & Jessica Nicolas & Ammar El Halabi & Sarah Meouche, 2017. "Landscape Risk Assessment Model and Decision Support System for the Protection of the Natural and Cultural Heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-27, November.
    9. Seweryn Zielinski & Celene B. Milanés & Elena Cambon & Ofelia Perez Montero & Lourdes Rizo & Andres Suarez & Benjamin Cuker & Giorgio Anfuso, 2021. "An Integrated Method for Landscape Assessment: Application to Santiago de Cuba Bay, Cuba," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-30, April.
    10. Merari Torreblanca & Flavio Choquehuanca & Javier Martínez & Michael Alfaro, 2024. "Indicators of Cultural Ecosystem Services for Peri-Urban Agricultural and Natural Areas at an Intermediate Scale: A Case Study of Arequipa, Peru," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-24, October.
    11. Shuang Zhao & Diechuan Yang & Chi Gao, 2023. "Identifying Landscape Character for Large Linear Heritage: A Case Study of the Ming Great Wall in Ji-Town, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, February.
    12. Teresa Batista & José Manuel de Mascarenhas & Paula Mendes & Carlos Pinto-Gomes, 2021. "Assessing Vegetation Heritage Value: The Alentejo Central (Portugal) as a Case Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, March.
    13. Kristina Veidemane & Agnese Reke & Anda Ruskule & Ivo Vinogradovs, 2024. "Assessment of Coastal Cultural Ecosystem Services and Well-Being for Integrating Stakeholder Values into Coastal Planning," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-34, March.
    14. Ingegärd Eliasson & Susanne Fredholm & Igor Knez & Eva Gustavsson, 2022. "The Need to Articulate Historic and Cultural Dimensions of Landscapes in Sustainable Environmental Planning—A Swedish Case Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-16, October.
    15. Yi-Min Chang Chien & Steve Carver & Alexis Comber, 2021. "An Exploratory Analysis of Expert and Nonexpert-Based Land-Scape Aesthetics Evaluations: A Case Study from Wales," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-18, February.
    16. Šťastná, Milada & Vaishar, Antonín, 2020. "Values of rural landscape: The case study Chlum u Třeboně (Bohemia)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    17. Jinvo Nam & Nicola Dempsey, 2019. "Place-Keeping for Health? Charting the Challenges for Urban Park Management in Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-26, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:12:p:5151-:d:1416552. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.