IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i11p4800-d1408962.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Quality Performance in Paper Pulp vs. Polyethylene Nursery Pots for Green Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Anunay Gupta

    (Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102, USA)

  • Arup Dey

    (Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102, USA
    Industrial Engineering, School of Engineering, Math, and Technology, Navajo Technical University, Crownpoint, NM 87313, USA)

  • Chiwon W. Lee

    (Department of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102, USA)

  • Nita Yodo

    (Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102, USA)

Abstract

The use of biodegradable paper pulp pots has been gaining traction, especially among environmentally conscious consumers and horticultural practitioners who prioritize sustainability. The choice between paper pulp and polyethylene nursery pots in horticultural practices is a complex decision, involving considerations such as environmental impact, cost-effectiveness, durability, and overall sustainability. This study aims to provide practical insights into the comparative performance of paper pulp and polyethylene pots, specifically in terms of plant health, degradation, and techno-economic considerations. The study involved the growth performance assessment of four plant species, Cannonball Tomato, Celebrity Tomato, Parris Island Lettuce, and French Marigold, in a greenhouse experiment setup. Additionally, a degradation analysis was conducted to determine the average degradation rate and pattern. Finally, a techno-economic analysis compared the value of plant health and degradation with the market price. By evaluating the quality performance aspects of paper pulp pots, this study not only provides valuable insights but also identifies potential areas of improvement for other biodegradable pots, thereby contributing to the ongoing efforts to promote sustainable horticultural practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Anunay Gupta & Arup Dey & Chiwon W. Lee & Nita Yodo, 2024. "Evaluation of Quality Performance in Paper Pulp vs. Polyethylene Nursery Pots for Green Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-18, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4800-:d:1408962
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4800/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4800/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeanger P. Juanga-Labayen & Qiuyan Yuan, 2021. "Making Biodegradable Seedling Pots from Textile and Paper Waste—Part B: Development and Evaluation of Seedling Pots," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-14, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4800-:d:1408962. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.