IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i11p4635-d1405060.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applicability of the International Framework for Eco-Industrial Park in China—Survey and Analysis Based on 17 Case Parks in Jiangxi Province

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Shao

    (Henan Institute of Advanced Technology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450003, China
    State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China)

  • Jingru Liu

    (State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
    College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Xiuzhi Hua

    (State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China)

  • Chinthaka Kularathne

    (Board of Investment, Colombo P.O. Box 1768, Sri Lanka)

  • Lei Shi

    (School of Resources and Environment, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China)

Abstract

Eco-industrial parks, as complex ecosystems at the regional scale, involve multi-dimensional interactions in terms of management, environment, economy, and society in their development. Given their complexity, it is difficult for a single indicator to comprehensively assess their sustainable development status. To promote sustainability and inclusive development of industrial parks, the World Bank Group published “the International Framework for Eco-Industrial Park” as a green evaluation benchmark. This paper examines the applicability of this framework in Chinese industrial parks, focusing on 17 cases in Jiangxi Province supported by the China-Jiangxi Eco-Industrial Parks Project. This study analyzes the indicator composition of the international EIP framework and compares it with the standardization system of eco-industrial parks in China. Through questionnaire surveys and dialogue interviews, this paper analyzed the compliance, practicality, and necessity of implementing the international EIP framework. Quantitative assessment using the analytic hierarchy process and the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model revealed that the framework is well suited to Chinese conditions, scoring over 80, reaching the “applicability level”. This research provides a scientific basis for park management, advocating for international concepts in park development. It also underscores the importance of a comprehensive framework for park construction, intelligent management strategies, and enterprise empowerment, collectively contributing to sustainable park development and enhanced international competitiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Shao & Jingru Liu & Xiuzhi Hua & Chinthaka Kularathne & Lei Shi, 2024. "Applicability of the International Framework for Eco-Industrial Park in China—Survey and Analysis Based on 17 Case Parks in Jiangxi Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-18, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4635-:d:1405060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4635/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4635/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chae, Song Hwa & Kim, Sang Hun & Yoon, Sung-Geun & Park, Sunwon, 2010. "Optimization of a waste heat utilization network in an eco-industrial park," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(6), pages 1978-1988, June.
    2. Pan, Ming & Sikorski, Janusz & Akroyd, Jethro & Mosbach, Sebastian & Lau, Raymond & Kraft, Markus, 2016. "Design technologies for eco-industrial parks: From unit operations to processes, plants and industrial networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 305-323.
    3. Li Song & Xiaoliang Zhou, 2021. "Does the Green Industry Policy Reduce Industrial Pollution Emissions?—Evidence from China’s National Eco-Industrial Park," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, June.
    4. Dick van Beers & Klaus Tyrkko & Alessandro Flammini & César Barahona & Christian Susan, 2020. "Results and Lessons Learned from Assessing 50 Industrial Parks in Eight Countries against the International Framework for Eco-Industrial Parks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-33, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Hai & Wang, Haiying & Zhu, Tong & Deng, Wanli, 2017. "A novel model for steam transportation considering drainage loss in pipeline networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 178-189.
    2. Anastasovski, Aleksandar, 2023. "What is needed for transformation of industrial parks into potential positive energy industrial parks? A review," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    3. Luca Fraccascia & Vahid Yazdanpanah & Guido Capelleveen & Devrim Murat Yazan, 2021. "Energy-based industrial symbiosis: a literature review for circular energy transition," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 4791-4825, April.
    4. Qunfang Xu & Kairui Cao & Jiaying Dai & Yuanyuan Zhu & Yue Dai, 2023. "Nonlinear Effects of Eco-Industrial Parks on Sulfur Dioxide and Carbon Dioxide Emissions—Estimation Based on Nonlinear DID," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Kairui Cao & Laiqun Jin & Yuanyuan Zhu & Zilong Nie & Hao Li, 2022. "Does China’s National Demonstration Eco-Industrial Park Reduce Carbon Dioxide and Sulfur Dioxide—A Study Based on the Upgrading and Transformation Process," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-19, October.
    6. Zhou, Li & Pan, Ming & Sikorski, Janusz J. & Garud, Sushant & Aditya, Leonardus K. & Kleinelanghorst, Martin J. & Karimi, Iftekhar A. & Kraft, Markus, 2017. "Towards an ontological infrastructure for chemical process simulation and optimization in the context of eco-industrial parks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 1284-1298.
    7. Hwangbo, Soonho & Lee, In-Beum & Han, Jeehoon, 2017. "Mathematical model to optimize design of integrated utility supply network and future global hydrogen supply network under demand uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 257-267.
    8. Kostevšek, Anja & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Varbanov, Petar Sabev & Papa, Gregor & Petek, Janez, 2016. "The concept of an ecosystem model to support the transformation to sustainable energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1460-1469.
    9. Sun, Fangtian & Fu, Lin & Sun, Jian & Zhang, Shigang, 2014. "A new waste heat district heating system with combined heat and power (CHP) based on ejector heat exchangers and absorption heat pumps," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 516-524.
    10. Chan, Wai Mun & Leong, Yik Teeng & Foo, Ji Jinn & Chew, Irene Mei Leng, 2017. "Synthesis of energy efficient chilled and cooling water network by integrating waste heat recovery refrigeration system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1555-1568.
    11. Oluleye, Gbemi & Jobson, Megan & Smith, Robin, 2015. "A hierarchical approach for evaluating and selecting waste heat utilization opportunities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 5-23.
    12. Robin Molinier & Pascal da Costa, 2019. "Infrastructure sharing synergies and industrial symbiosis: optimal capacity oversizing and pricing," Post-Print hal-01792032, HAL.
    13. Keren Chen, 2022. "Industrial Policy’s Effect on Cross-Border Mergers’ Decisions—Theoretical and Empirical Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-25, October.
    14. Asghari, M. & Afshari, H. & Jaber, M.Y. & Searcy, C., 2023. "Credibility-based cascading approach to achieve net-zero emissions in energy symbiosis networks using an Organic Rankine Cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    15. Han, Jee-Hoon & Lee, In-Beum, 2014. "A systematic process integration framework for the optimal design and techno-economic performance analysis of energy supply and CO2 mitigation strategies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 136-146.
    16. Xingyun Yan & Lingyu Wang & Mingzhu Fang & Jie Hu, 2022. "How Can Industrial Parks Achieve Carbon Neutrality? Literature Review and Research Prospect Based on the CiteSpace Knowledge Map," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-29, December.
    17. Zhang, Chuan & Zhou, Li & Chhabra, Pulkit & Garud, Sushant S. & Aditya, Kevin & Romagnoli, Alessandro & Comodi, Gabriele & Dal Magro, Fabio & Meneghetti, Antonella & Kraft, Markus, 2016. "A novel methodology for the design of waste heat recovery network in eco-industrial park using techno-economic analysis and multi-objective optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 88-102.
    18. Imran, Zulfiqar Ali & Ahad, Muhammad, 2023. "Safe-haven properties of green bonds for industrial sectors (GICS) in the United States: Evidence from Covid-19 pandemic and Global Financial Crisis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 408-423.
    19. Qian, Long & Xu, Xiaolin & Sun, Ying & Zhou, Yunjie, 2022. "Carbon emission reduction effects of eco-industrial park policy in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    20. Guo, Dong & Zhou, Peng, 2021. "Green bonds as hedging assets before and after COVID: A comparative study between the US and China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4635-:d:1405060. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.