Author
Listed:
- Yu Zhou
(Faculty of Maritime and Transportation, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China
Collaborative Innovation Center of Modern Urban Traffic Technologies, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
National Traffic Management Engineering & Technology Research Center Ningbo University Sub-Center, Ningbo 315832, China)
- Weijie Du
(Ningbo Pilot Station, Ningbo 315040, China)
- Jiao Liu
(Faculty of Maritime and Transportation, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China
Collaborative Innovation Center of Modern Urban Traffic Technologies, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
National Traffic Management Engineering & Technology Research Center Ningbo University Sub-Center, Ningbo 315832, China)
- Haoqing Li
(Faculty of Maritime and Transportation, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China
Collaborative Innovation Center of Modern Urban Traffic Technologies, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
National Traffic Management Engineering & Technology Research Center Ningbo University Sub-Center, Ningbo 315832, China)
- Manel Grifoll
(Barcelona School of Nautical Studies, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC—BarcelonaTech), 08034 Barcelona, Spain)
- Weijun Song
(Ningbo Liwan New Material Co., Ltd., Ningbo 315812, China)
- Pengjun Zheng
(Faculty of Maritime and Transportation, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China
Collaborative Innovation Center of Modern Urban Traffic Technologies, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
National Traffic Management Engineering & Technology Research Center Ningbo University Sub-Center, Ningbo 315832, China)
Abstract
The accurate timing for collision avoidance actions is crucial for preventing maritime collisions. Traditional methods often rely on collision risk assessments, using quantitative indicators like the Distance to the Closest Point of Approach (DCPA) and the Time to the Closest Point of Approach (TCPA). Ship Officers on Watch (OOWs) are required to execute avoidance maneuvers once these indicators reach or exceed preset safety thresholds. However, the effectiveness of these indicators is limited by uncertainties in the maritime environment and the human behaviors of OOWs. To address these limitations, this study introduces a machine learning method to learn collision avoidance behavior from empirical data of ship collision avoidance, particularly in cross-encounter situations. The research utilizes Automatic Identification System (AIS) data from the open waters around Ningbo Zhoushan Port. After data preprocessing and applying spatio-temporal constraints, this study identifies ship trajectory pairs in crossing scenarios and calculates their relative motion parameters. The Douglas–Peucker algorithm is used to identify the timing of ship collision avoidance actions and a collision avoidance decision dataset is constructed. The Random Forest algorithm was then used to analyze the factors affecting the timing of collision avoidance, and six key factors were identified: the distance, relative speed, relative bearing, DCPA, TCPA, and the ratio of the lengths of the giving-way and stand-on ships. These factors serve as inputs for the XGBoost algorithm model, which is enhanced with Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), and thus constructing a ship collision avoidance decision model. In addition, considering the inherent errors in any model and the dynamic nature of the ship collision avoidance process, an action time window for collision avoidance is introduced, which provides a more flexible time range for ships to make timely collision avoidance responses based on actual conditions and the specific encounter environment. This model provides OOWs with accurate timing for taking collision avoidance decisions. Case studies have validated the practicality and effectiveness of this model, offering new theoretical foundations and practical guidance for maritime collision avoidance.
Suggested Citation
Yu Zhou & Weijie Du & Jiao Liu & Haoqing Li & Manel Grifoll & Weijun Song & Pengjun Zheng, 2024.
"Determination of Ship Collision Avoidance Timing Using Machine Learning Method,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-23, May.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4626-:d:1404830
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4626-:d:1404830. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.