IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i11p4444-d1400698.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Laboratory Safety Evaluation and Weed Control Potential of Pre- and Post-Emergence Herbicides for Quinoa

Author

Listed:
  • Haojun Xiong

    (College of Resource and Environment, Anhui Science and Technology University, FengYang, Chuzhou 233100, China)

  • Cheng Li

    (College of Agriculture, Anhui Science and Technology University, FengYang, Chuzhou 233100, China)

  • Mujeeba Fida

    (College of Agriculture, Anhui Science and Technology University, FengYang, Chuzhou 233100, China)

  • Mengyuan Yu

    (College of Agriculture, Anhui Science and Technology University, FengYang, Chuzhou 233100, China)

  • Xiangyu Tao

    (College of Agriculture, Anhui Science and Technology University, FengYang, Chuzhou 233100, China)

  • Yaling Bi

    (College of Agriculture, Anhui Science and Technology University, FengYang, Chuzhou 233100, China)

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to identify suitable herbicides for quinoa fields in Anhui Province and explore the value of their potential application in order to achieve the sustainable weed management of the crop and tackle the global issue of unregistered herbicides in quinoa fields. Employing a pre-emergence seed soaking method, we evaluated the effects of different herbicides, such as anilofos, prometryn, pendimethalin, and atrazine on the germination inhibition rate of quinoa seeds, as well as their impacts on the growth indicators of quinoa seedlings. Our findings show that, while these herbicides initially suppressed quinoa seed germination, this effect decreased over time, allowing for the successful germination of all seeds, suggesting the existence of a recovery mechanism in quinoa. An increase in herbicide concentration was correlated with significant decreases in the germination vigor and index of quinoa seeds, along with a decrease in plant height, root length, and fresh weight. Notably, anilofos, prometryn, pendimethalin, and atrazine demonstrated significant inhibitory effects on quinoa seedlings, thus providing critical insights into the sensitivity of quinoa to these chemicals. Greenhouse pot experiments showed that pre-emergence herbicides, such as napropamide, pretilachlor, s-metolachlor, and anilofos, and post-emergence herbicides, including fluroxypyr, penoxsulam, clethodim, quizalofop-P-ethyl, oxaziclomefone, metamifop, benzobicyclon, nicosulfuron, and pinoxaden, are safe for quinoa and suitable for further field trials, broadening the options for integrated weed management strategies. The results of the mixture experiments indicated that penoxsulam and metamifop are safe for quinoa at a ratio of 1:4.6, and their combined activities against dominant weeds in quinoa fields in Anhui Province, such as Digitaria sanguinalis , Cyperus iria , and Amaranthus viridis , were higher than those of single-agent doses, with fresh weight inhibition rates ranging from 66.98% to 92.16% and selectivity indexes ranging from 176.88 to 3282.17. Therefore, this mixture offers a promising approach to enhanced weed control in a sustainable manner.

Suggested Citation

  • Haojun Xiong & Cheng Li & Mujeeba Fida & Mengyuan Yu & Xiangyu Tao & Yaling Bi, 2024. "Laboratory Safety Evaluation and Weed Control Potential of Pre- and Post-Emergence Herbicides for Quinoa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-25, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4444-:d:1400698
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4444/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4444/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Angelika Astaykina & Sergey Elansky & Evgeniy Kubarev & Daniil Semeniushkin & Irina Smirnova & Elena Chudinova & Vladimir Demin & Alexander Nikolaev & Sergey Shoba, 2023. "Identifying the Best Herbicides for Weed Control in Chicory ( Cichorium intybus )," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4444-:d:1400698. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.