IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i10p4271-d1397732.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementation of the Sustainability Compass: A Bottom-Up Social Learning Approach in Initial Pilot Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Maurizio Sajeva

    (Pellervo Economic Research—PTT, 00180 Helsinki, Finland)

  • Jonne Kotta

    (Estonian Marine Institute, University of Tartu, 51014 Tartu, Estonia)

  • Matti Valonen

    (Pellervo Economic Research—PTT, 00180 Helsinki, Finland)

  • Olli Korhonen

    (Pellervo Economic Research—PTT, 00180 Helsinki, Finland)

  • Pekka Kinnunen

    (Pellervo Economic Research—PTT, 00180 Helsinki, Finland)

  • Laura Aalto

    (Pellervo Economic Research—PTT, 00180 Helsinki, Finland)

  • Kirsi Noro

    (Pellervo Economic Research—PTT, 00180 Helsinki, Finland)

  • Paula Horne

    (Pellervo Economic Research—PTT, 00180 Helsinki, Finland)

Abstract

This paper presents the Sustainability Compass as an emerging innovative bottom-up framework that promotes social learning about overall sustainability—i.e., human wellbeing and prosperity within environmental boundaries—by mean of its practical implementation in the PlanWise4Blue geoportal. The Sustainability Compass aims to put the theoretical idea of sustainability into practice by a systemic approach that continuously generates, refines and updates appropriate themes and metrics, through bottom-up enlarged participatory learning involving all researchers, entrepreneurs, environmental managers, and anyone else with an interest. Such inclusiveness promotes a common understanding of sustainability, cultivates a collective vision and facilitates the assessment of sustainability levels in different contexts, including national and regional planning efforts. The Sustainability Compass operationalises the generic, top-down and differently interpretable UN SDGs into more practical and bottom-up practice. This article outlines the finalised structure of the Sustainability Compass and presents its first application through case studies of cross-border aquaculture in Finland and Estonia, and a collaborative initiative in Finnish wind energy. Through detailed analysis of interviews and workshops, the article explains the empirical findings and offers a comprehensive guide to the use of the Sustainability Compass. This is exemplified by its integration with the PlanWise4Blue geoportal, demonstrating its practicality and effectiveness in real-world applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Maurizio Sajeva & Jonne Kotta & Matti Valonen & Olli Korhonen & Pekka Kinnunen & Laura Aalto & Kirsi Noro & Paula Horne, 2024. "Implementation of the Sustainability Compass: A Bottom-Up Social Learning Approach in Initial Pilot Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-29, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:10:p:4271-:d:1397732
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/10/4271/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/10/4271/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel Kahneman & Jack L. Knetsch & Richard H. Thaler, 1991. "Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 5(1), pages 193-206, Winter.
    2. Daniel Kahneman, 2003. "Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(5), pages 1449-1475, December.
    3. Amartya Sen, 1997. "Development and Thinking at the Beginning of the 21st Century," STICERD - Development Economics Papers - From 2008 this series has been superseded by Economic Organisation and Public Policy Discussion Papers 02, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Randall Holcombe, 2005. "Government growth in the twenty-first century," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 124(1), pages 95-114, July.
    2. Steven Andrew Culpepper & James Joseph Balamuta, 2017. "A Hierarchical Model for Accuracy and Choice on Standardized Tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(3), pages 820-845, September.
    3. L. Mundaca & H. Moncreiff, 2021. "New Perspectives on Green Energy Defaults," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 357-383, September.
    4. Nolan Ritter & Julia Anna Bingler, 2021. "Do homo sapiens know their prices? Insights on dysfunctional price mechanisms from a large field experiment," CER-ETH Economics working paper series 21/348, CER-ETH - Center of Economic Research (CER-ETH) at ETH Zurich.
    5. Venkatachalam, L., 2008. "Behavioral economics for environmental policy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(4), pages 640-645, November.
    6. Clement A. Tisdell, 2017. "Bounded Rationality, Satisficing and the Evolution of Economic Thought," Economic Theory, Applications and Issues Working Papers 264873, University of Queensland, School of Economics.
    7. Haris Krijestorac & Rajiv Garg & Prabhudev Konana, 2021. "Decisions Under the Illusion of Objectivity: Digital Embeddedness and B2B Purchasing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(7), pages 2232-2251, July.
    8. Shambhavi Tiwari & Morten Moshagen & Benjamin E. Hilbig & Ingo Zettler, 2021. "The Dark Factor of Personality and Risk-Taking," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-18, August.
    9. Cédric Gutierrez & Tomasz Obloj & Douglas H. Frank, 2021. "Better to have led and lost than never to have led at all? Lost leadership and effort provision in dynamic tournaments," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(4), pages 774-801, April.
    10. Bogliacino, Francesco & Codagnone, Cristiano, 2021. "Microfoundations, behaviour, and evolution: Evidence from experiments," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 372-385.
    11. Hatime Kamilcelebi, 2019. "Framing Effect and Decision-Making in the Market: A Research on Profit-Seeking and Religiousness in Turkey," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(7), pages 417-425, July.
    12. Frances C. Moore, 2017. "Learning, Adaptation, And Weather In A Changing Climate," Climate Change Economics (CCE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 8(04), pages 1-21, November.
    13. Ralf Elbert & Lowis Seikowsky, 2017. "The influences of behavioral biases, barriers and facilitators on the willingness of forwarders’ decision makers to modal shift from unimodal road freight transport to intermodal road–rail freight tra," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(8), pages 1083-1123, November.
    14. Mastrogiorgio, Antonio & Petracca, Enrico, 2016. "Embodying rationality," MPRA Paper 74658, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. HAMADI, Malika & RENGIFO, Erick & SALZMAN, Diego, 2005. "Illusionary finance and trading behavior," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2005004, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    16. Erich Renz & Marvin M. Müller & Kim Leonardo Böhm, 2023. "When nudges promote neutral behavior: an experimental study of managerial decisions under risk and uncertainty," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(8), pages 1309-1354, October.
    17. Francisco Molins & Fatmanur Sahin & Miguel Ángel Serrano, 2022. "The Genetics of Risk Aversion: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-22, November.
    18. repec:cup:judgdm:v:9:y:2014:i:1:p:77-82 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Daniel Gottlieb & Olivia S. Mitchell, 2020. "Narrow Framing and Long‐Term Care Insurance," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 87(4), pages 861-893, December.
    20. Hobman, Elizabeth V. & Frederiks, Elisha R. & Stenner, Karen & Meikle, Sarah, 2016. "Uptake and usage of cost-reflective electricity pricing: Insights from psychology and behavioural economics," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 455-467.
    21. Bodo Herzog, 2019. "Dynamic Expectation Theory: Insights for Market Participants," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-14, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:10:p:4271-:d:1397732. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.