IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i10p4262-d1397311.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Raising the Green Roof: Enhancing Youth Water Literacy through Built Environment Education

Author

Listed:
  • Laura B. Cole

    (Department of Design & Merchandising, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA)

  • Lilian Priscilla

    (Department of Architectural Studies, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA)

  • Laura Zangori

    (Department of Learning, Teaching, & Curriculum, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA)

  • Beth Kania-Gosche

    (Department of Education, Missouri University of Science & Technology, Rolla, MO 65409, USA)

  • Joel Burken

    (Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Missouri University of Science & Technology, Rolla, MO 65409, USA)

Abstract

Green roofs cool cities, clean the air, provide habitat, and manage stormwater. They are compelling tools to teach interconnected human-ecological systems. This study included the design, pilot, and evaluation of a fourth-grade science unit entitled “Raising the Green Roof”, exploring these connections. Five classrooms in two Midwestern U.S. public elementary schools participated, and 4th-grade students ( n = 73) drew systems models at three time points (212 models) and wrote their ideas. Qualitative content analyses of the models showed that learners were increasingly combining social systems (green roof infrastructure) with ecological systems (water cycle) across the unit. Students also increasingly evidenced specific knowledge as they progressed through the unit. The analysis of student models revealed that most student confusion is related to built environment aspects (e.g., how water moves from building roofs to municipal waterways). Results of the study suggest the potential for teaching socio-hydrologic systems thinking at the fourth-grade level. The findings emphasize the need to enhance built environment education for youth in science units that aspire to connect features of the built environment, such as green roofs, with ecology. The study additionally reinforced the effectiveness of place-based units in elementary education that emphasize science practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura B. Cole & Lilian Priscilla & Laura Zangori & Beth Kania-Gosche & Joel Burken, 2024. "Raising the Green Roof: Enhancing Youth Water Literacy through Built Environment Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-26, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:10:p:4262-:d:1397311
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/10/4262/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/10/4262/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adri Smaling, 1992. "Varieties of methodological intersubjectivity — the relations with qualitative and quantitative research, and with objectivity," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 169-180, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. René Bohnsack & Francesca Ciulli & Ans Kolk, 2021. "The role of business models in firm internationalization: An exploration of European electricity firms in the context of the energy transition," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(5), pages 824-852, July.
    2. Marianne Döös & Lena Wilhelmson, 2014. "Proximity and distance: phases of intersubjective qualitative data analysis in a research team," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 1089-1106, March.
    3. Vinícius P. Rodrigues & Daniela C. A. Pigosso & Jakob W. Andersen & Tim C. McAloone, 2018. "Evaluating the Potential Business Benefits of Ecodesign Implementation: A Logic Model Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-26, June.
    4. Claude Villeneuve & David Tremblay & Olivier Riffon & Georges Y. Lanmafankpotin & Sylvie Bouchard, 2017. "A Systemic Tool and Process for Sustainability Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-29, October.
    5. Peter Swanborn, 1996. "A common base for quality control criteria in quantitative and qualitative research," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 19-35, February.
    6. N. Romm, 1997. "Becoming More Accountable: A Comment on Hammersley and Gomm," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 2(3), pages 129-136, September.
    7. Francesca Ciulli & Ans Kolk & Siri Boe-Lillegraven, 2020. "Circularity Brokers: Digital Platform Organizations and Waste Recovery in Food Supply Chains," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(2), pages 299-331, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:10:p:4262-:d:1397311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.