IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2023i1p281-d1309219.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Smart and Sustainable Human-Centred Workstations for Operators with Disability in the Age of Industry 5.0: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Amberlynn Bonello

    (Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malta, MSD2080 Msida, Malta)

  • Emmanuel Francalanza

    (Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malta, MSD2080 Msida, Malta)

  • Paul Refalo

    (Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malta, MSD2080 Msida, Malta)

Abstract

The World Bank has reported that over one billion individuals have a disability, implying that almost fifteen percent of the global inhabitants are susceptible to undergoing levels of discrimination, especially in employment. This issue may prevail on a manufacturing shop floor, whereby a wave of standardisation dominates such as in the design of shop floor workstations. Despite advances made in the literature, people with disabilities are still siloed from manufacturing. Consequently, the aim of this research work was to analyse literature’s current state of the art on the design of workstations for operators with disabilities within the context of Industry 5.0, where sustainability, human-centricity, and resilience are upheld. The study employed a systematic review of 69 publications from Scopus and Google Scholar published between 2013 and 2023, adhering to the updated PRISMA guidelines to identify the major research gaps. The review contributes an understanding of the current academic and industrial limitations such as the absence of social applicability of Industry 4.0 technology, the rift between academic knowhow and industrial implementation, and the lack of alignment with the sustainable development goals (SDGs). Additionally, the review uncovered an absence in work bridging four disciplines together: workstation design, Industry 5.0, sustainability, and disability. An unprecedented understanding of the interdependency between all four disciplines within the remit of smart, sustainable, and inclusive manufacturing workstations is contributed. This review proposes directions amidst the four most relevant SDGs—SDGs 8, 9, 10, and 12 to the topic.

Suggested Citation

  • Amberlynn Bonello & Emmanuel Francalanza & Paul Refalo, 2023. "Smart and Sustainable Human-Centred Workstations for Operators with Disability in the Age of Industry 5.0: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-35, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2023:i:1:p:281-:d:1309219
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/281/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/281/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Felipe F.B. Araújo & Alysson M. Costa & Cristóbal Miralles, 2015. "Balancing parallel assembly lines with disabled workers," European Journal of Industrial Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(3), pages 344-365.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olcay Polat & Can B. Kalayci & Özcan Mutlu & Surendra M. Gupta, 2016. "A two-phase variable neighbourhood search algorithm for assembly line worker assignment and balancing problem type-II: an industrial case study," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(3), pages 722-741, February.
    2. Battaïa, Olga & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2022. "Hybridizations in line balancing problems: A comprehensive review on new trends and formulations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2023:i:1:p:281-:d:1309219. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.