IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i9p7567-d1139724.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Cultivated Land Quality Restriction Factors Based on Cultivated Land Quality Level Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Mengmeng Tang

    (College of Resources and Environment, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China)

  • Cuiting Wang

    (College of Resources and Environment, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China)

  • Chunyang Ying

    (College of Resources and Environment, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China)

  • Shuai Mei

    (College of Resources and Environment, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China)

  • Tong Tong

    (College of Resources and Environment, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China)

  • Youhua Ma

    (College of Resources and Environment, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China)

  • Qiang Wang

    (College of Resources and Environment, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China)

Abstract

Cultivated land quality is an essential agricultural resource and production element. To increase cultivated land quality in a targeted way, it is crucial to understand the features of regional elements that constrain its quality. In order to diagnose the restriction factors affecting the improvement of cultivated land quality grades and conduct a quantitative analysis of the regional cultivated land quality improvement restriction factors, the restriction index model was used in this study to analyze the distribution characteristics of cultivated land quality grades in East Anhui, China. The results show that there are six main restriction factors of cultivated land quality in the study area, which are effective soil layer thickness, soil organic matter, soil acidity and alkalinity, plough layer texture, irrigation capacity, drainage capacity, and obstacle factors, among which the main restriction factors of the first to third grades are soil organic matter, soil acidity and alkalinity, and the main restriction factors of the fourth to seventh grades are soil organic matter, and soil acidity and alkalinity. The main restriction factors of the soil organic matter, effective soil layer thickness, and obstacle factors are the key restriction factors in the ninth to tenth classes.

Suggested Citation

  • Mengmeng Tang & Cuiting Wang & Chunyang Ying & Shuai Mei & Tong Tong & Youhua Ma & Qiang Wang, 2023. "Research on Cultivated Land Quality Restriction Factors Based on Cultivated Land Quality Level Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-12, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7567-:d:1139724
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7567/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7567/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nan Wang & Jian Zu & Mu Li & Jinyi Zhang & Jinmin Hao, 2020. "Spatial Zoning of Cultivated Land in Shandong Province Based on the Trinity of Quantity, Quality and Ecology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Glumac, Brano & Herrera-Gomez, Marcos & Licheron, Julien, 2019. "A hedonic urban land price index," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 802-812.
    3. Paudel, Gokul P. & KC, Dilli Bahadur & Rahut, Dil Bahadur & Justice, Scott E. & McDonald, Andrew J., 2019. "Scale-appropriate mechanization impacts on productivity among smallholders: Evidence from rice systems in the mid-hills of Nepal," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 104-113.
    4. Mintesinot Taye & Belay Simane & Benjamin F. Zaitchik & Yihenew G. Selassie & Shimelis Setegn, 2019. "Land Use Evaluation over the Jema Watershed, in the Upper Blue Nile River Basin, Northwestern Highlands of Ethiopia," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-16, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pingluo Xue & Chongyang Shen & Huaizhi Tang & Yunjia Liu & Yuanfang Huang, 2024. "Knowledge Atlas of Cultivated Land Quality Evaluation Based on Web of Science Since the 21st Century (2000–2023)," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, October.
    2. Fan Wang & Pengtao Zhang & Guijun Zhang & Jiahao Cui, 2023. "Agricultural Land Quality Evaluation and Utilization Zoning Based on the Production–Ecology–Health Dimension: A Case Study of Huanghua City," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-16, July.
    3. Hongmei Yu & Zhaokun Yu & Xubing Zhang, 2024. "Condition Information Entropy and Rough Set Method Based on Particle Swarm Optimization Applied in the Natural Quality Evaluation of Cultivated Land," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-13, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. LoPiccalo, Katherine, 2022. "Impact of broadband penetration on U.S. Farm productivity: A panel approach," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(9).
    2. Qian Sun & Mingjie Wu & Peiyu Du & Wei Qi & Xinyang Yu, 2022. "Spatial Layout Optimization and Simulation of Cultivated Land Based on the Life Community Theory in a Mountainous and Hilly Area of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Tezcan, Ahmet & Büyüktaş, Kenan & Akkaya Aslan, Şerife Tülin, 2020. "A multi-criteria model for land valuation in the land consolidation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    4. Yuanying Chi & Wenbing Zhou & Zhenyu Wang & Yu Hu & Xiao Han, 2021. "The Influence Paths of Agricultural Mechanization on Green Agricultural Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, November.
    5. Brown, Brendan & Paudel, Gokul P. & Krupnik, Timothy J., 2021. "Visualising adoption processes through a stepwise framework: A case study of mechanisation on the Nepal Terai," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    6. Emma Karki & Akriti Sharma & Brendan Brown, 2022. "Farm mechanisation in Nepal's Terai Region: Policy context, drivers and options," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), pages 287-305, March.
    7. Aryal, Jeetendra Prakash & Rahut, Dil Bahadur & Thapa, Ganesh & Simtowe, Franklin, 2021. "Mechanisation of small-scale farms in South Asia: Empirical evidence derived from farm households survey," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    8. Kazak Jan K. & Simeunović Nataša & Hendricks Andreas, 2019. "Hidden Public Value Identification of Real Estate Management Decisions," Real Estate Management and Valuation, Sciendo, vol. 27(4), pages 96-104, December.
    9. Idelphonse O. Saliou & Afio Zannou & Augustin K. N. Aoudji & Albert N. Honlonkou, 2020. "Drivers of Mechanization in Cotton Production in Benin, West Africa," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-13, November.
    10. Aihounton, Ghislain & Christiaensen, Luc, 2023. "Does Agricultural Intensification Pay?," Jobs Group Papers, Notes, and Guides 32579493, The World Bank.
    11. Wang, Teng & Yi, Fujin & Liu, Huilin & Wu, Ximing & Zhong, Funing, 2021. "Can Agricultural Mechanization Have a Mitigation Effect on China's Yield Variability?," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315098, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. Li, Jingrong & Zhang, Chenlei & Mi, Yunsheng, 2021. "Land titling and internal migration: Evidence from China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    13. Xin Deng & Zhongcheng Yan & Dingde Xu & Yanbin Qi, 2020. "Land Registration, Adjustment Experience, and Agricultural Machinery Adoption: Empirical Analysis from Rural China," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-14, March.
    14. Cariappa, A. G. Adeeth & Sendhil, R, 2021. "Does Institutional Credit Induce on-Farm Investments? Evidence from India," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315221, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Aihounton, Ghislain & Christiaensen, Luc, 2024. "Does agricultural intensification pay in the context of structural transformation?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    16. Fang, Peixun & Belton, Ben, 2020. "Maize and Pigeon Pea Production, Profitability, and Tied Credit in Southern Shan State," Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security Policy Research Papers 303952, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security (FSP).
    17. Auci, Sabrina & Pronti, Andrea, 2023. "Irrigation technology adaptation for a sustainable agriculture: A panel endogenous switching analysis on the Italian farmland productivity," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    18. Xi Yu & Xiyang Yin & Yuying Liu & Dongmei Li, 2021. "Do Agricultural Machinery Services Facilitate Land Transfer? Evidence from Rice Farmers in Sichuan Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-14, April.
    19. Asad Aziz & Muhammad Mushahid Anwar & Hazem Ghassan Abdo & Hussein Almohamad & Ahmed Abdullah Al Dughairi & Motrih Al-Mutiry, 2023. "Proximity to Neighborhood Services and Property Values in Urban Area: An Evaluation through the Hedonic Pricing Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-12, April.
    20. Rachana Devkota & Laxmi Prasad Pant & Hom Nath Gartaula & Kirit Patel & Devendra Gauchan & Helen Hambly-Odame & Balaram Thapa & Manish N. Raizada, 2020. "Responsible Agricultural Mechanization Innovation for the Sustainable Development of Nepal’s Hillside Farming System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7567-:d:1139724. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.