IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i9p7376-d1135892.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experimental Study of Improvement in Tensile Property of Geosynthetics under Confinement

Author

Listed:
  • Dan Li

    (Department of Geotechnical Engineering, College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
    School of Architecture and Transportation Engineering, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China)

  • Yihuai Liang

    (School of Architecture and Transportation Engineering, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China)

  • Di Wu

    (School of Architecture and Transportation Engineering, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China)

  • Chen Luo

    (Department of Geotechnical Engineering, College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Yanxin Yang

    (School of Civil Engineering, Sichuan University of Science & Engineering, Zigong 643000, China)

  • Yang Yi

    (School of Architecture and Transportation Engineering, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China)

  • Jianjian Wu

    (School of Architecture and Transportation Engineering, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China)

Abstract

A new in-soil tensile test apparatus was developed to simulate the in-soil stress condition of geosynthetics in a real working state. An in-soil tensile test with or without friction was conducted, along with in-air tensile tests of eight types of geosynthetics, to evaluate tensile properties, including tensile load and secant tensile stiffness under different confining stresses using various methods. Under confinement, the tensile properties of geosynthetics increased with growing confinement, which were greater than those for the in-air tensile test, and the tensile properties were similar for tests with or without friction. The tensile load improvement factors F T − σ and f T − σ were introduced to quantify the confinement and reinforcement–soil friction differences between different tests, and the improvement ratios γ 1 and γ 2 were proposed to quantify the improvement of tensile load under confinement for the test with and without friction, respectively. Two formulas were proposed to predict the confined tensile properties of geosynthetics. The results showed that confinement was the major factor that improved the tensile properties of geosynthetics compared to reinforcement–soil friction. When the improvement ratio is not less than 1.5, the confined tensile load should replace the in-air tensile load with the tensile strength design of geosynthetics, which provides an insight into the design of reinforced soil structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Dan Li & Yihuai Liang & Di Wu & Chen Luo & Yanxin Yang & Yang Yi & Jianjian Wu, 2023. "Experimental Study of Improvement in Tensile Property of Geosynthetics under Confinement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7376-:d:1135892
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7376/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7376/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wei Guo & Thanh T. Nguyen, 2023. "Recent Advancements in Geosynthetic Engineering for Sustainable Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-3, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7376-:d:1135892. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.