IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i8p7014-d1129638.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Sighted and Visually Impaired Users to the Physical and Perceptual Dimensions of an Oasis Settlement Urban Park

Author

Listed:
  • Samiha Boucherit

    (Department of Architecture and Industrial Design, Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 81031 Aversa, CE, Italy)

  • Luigi Maffei

    (Department of Architecture and Industrial Design, Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 81031 Aversa, CE, Italy)

  • Massimiliano Masullo

    (Department of Architecture and Industrial Design, Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 81031 Aversa, CE, Italy)

  • Djihed Berkouk

    (Department of Architecture, Biskra University, Biskra 07000, Algeria
    School of Design and Architecture, Dar Al-Hekma University, Jeddah 22246, Saudi Arabia)

  • Tallal Abdel Karim Bouzir

    (Institute of Architecture and Urban Planning, Blida University, Blida 09000, Algeria)

Abstract

Inclusive design (ID) is a design process that ensures that all people, particularly marginalized groups, can use the environment. Inclusive design (ID) in architecture is based on accurate data related to user experiences where the users’ perception of the built environment demonstrates the optimal facilitation of their expectations, needs, and demands. Despite this, in studies about inclusive design and multisensory architecture, the perspective of visually impaired people (VIP) is still lacking, especially in accessing public spaces. To address this gap, this study aims to investigate how sighted and visually impaired people perceive an oasis settlement urban park’s physical environment and verify the similarities and differences between these two categories. The research was conducted by applying two approaches, one qualitative based on a series of field surveys and the other quantitative relying on in situ measurements of the physical dimensions of the environment. The main findings of this study show that visually impaired people deserve special consideration due to their varying abilities to perceive the surrounding environment. Furthermore, the results indicate that auditory environments are more perceptible to the visually impaired than the sighted. In contrast, findings from the analysis of the perceived restorativeness scale (PRS-11) show that sighted users of the park have a slightly higher average score than visually impaired users regarding its components of Fascination, Being-Away, Coherence, and Scope. According to the Semantic Differential Scale of Multi-Variable Evaluation of the Park Environment, there are no significant differences between park users’ perceptions of the park’s nature and the thermal environment. The conclusion suggests that to ensure users’ well-being, it is crucial to understand the different individual needs among groups of users and come up with innovative and all-inclusive solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Samiha Boucherit & Luigi Maffei & Massimiliano Masullo & Djihed Berkouk & Tallal Abdel Karim Bouzir, 2023. "Assessment of Sighted and Visually Impaired Users to the Physical and Perceptual Dimensions of an Oasis Settlement Urban Park," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-16, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:7014-:d:1129638
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/7014/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/7014/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christina E. Mediastika & Anugrah S. Sudarsono & Luciana Kristanto & Gunawan Tanuwidjaja & Rony G. Sunaryo & Rully Damayanti, 2020. "Appraising the sonic environment of urban parks using the soundscape dimension of visually impaired people," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 216-241, April.
    2. Christina E. Mediastika & Anugrah S. Sudarsono & Luciana Kristanto, 2022. "The sound perceptions of urban pavements by sighted and visually impaired people – a case study in Surabaya, Indonesia," Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 106-129, January.
    3. Djihed Berkouk & Tallal Abdel Karim Bouzir & Samiha Boucherit & Sara Khelil & Chafik Mahaya & Mohamed Elhadi Matallah & Said Mazouz, 2022. "Exploring the Multisensory Interaction between Luminous, Thermal and Auditory Environments through the Spatial Promenade Experience: A Case Study of a University Campus in an Oasis Settlement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eunmie Jang & Hyo Bhin Choi & Moohan Kim, 2024. "The Restorative Effects of Urban Parks on Stress Control Ability and Community Attachment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-14, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jerónimo Vida & José Antonio Almagro & Rafael García-Quesada & Francesco Aletta & Tin Oberman & Andrew Mitchell & Jian Kang, 2021. "Urban Soundscape Assessment by Visually Impaired People: First Methodological Approach in Granada (Spain)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-24, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:7014-:d:1129638. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.