IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i8p6356-d1118205.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of Fuzzy Theory to the Investigation of Children’s Preference for Wooden Toy Materials—A Case Study of Rocking Horses

Author

Listed:
  • Yu-Chun Liu

    (Department of Wood-Based Materials and Design, National Chiayi University, Chiayi City 60004, Taiwan)

  • An-Sheng Lee

    (Department of Wood-Based Materials and Design, National Chiayi University, Chiayi City 60004, Taiwan)

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the sensory preferences of children aged 8–12 regarding the material and characteristics of wooden toys. Taking wooden rocking horses as research samples, this study selected three types of wood, respectively Pinus taiwanensis, Fagus sylvatica, and Juglans nigra, which are significantly different in appearance from solid wood commonly used to make wooden toys. The experiment was conducted through on-site observation and questionnaire surveys to record children’s preferences for wood characteristics, such as the characteristic factors of wood texture, color and luster, touch, weight, smell, and overall preference. Descriptive statistics and analysis were performed using SPSS 25V, and the experimental results were analyzed and interpreted using fuzzy trigonometric functions. The findings reveal that Taiwan pine had the highest average worth score among the various evaluation characteristics in terms of wood surface performance preferences. Other types of wood also showed different favorability results in different characteristics. This study also analyzes the correlation and significant differences in favorability evaluation using fuzzy theory. This study provides insights that can be useful for toy designers and children’s teaching aid developers to purchase and match wooden toys effectively while promoting the efficient use of wood resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu-Chun Liu & An-Sheng Lee, 2023. "Application of Fuzzy Theory to the Investigation of Children’s Preference for Wooden Toy Materials—A Case Study of Rocking Horses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-15, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:6356-:d:1118205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/6356/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/6356/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hao-Chang Tsai & An-Sheng Lee & Huang-Ning Lee & H. H. (Buddy) Hooper, 2022. "Use of Similarity of Triangular Fuzzy Numbers and a Derivation Calculation Formula in Assessment of Mortise-Tenon Joints Applied in the Joinery Category of Regional Taiwan Skills Competitions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-13, July.
    2. Anca Madar & Dana Boscor & Codruţa-Adina Baltescu & Nicoleta-Andreea Neacşu, 2012. "Wooden Versus Plastic Toys," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 4, pages 162-166, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nick Lin-Hi & Igor Blumberg, 2017. "The Power(lessness) of Industry Self-regulation to Promote Responsible Labor Standards: Insights from the Chinese Toy Industry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(4), pages 789-805, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:6356-:d:1118205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.