IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i7p6065-d1112921.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using the OKR Method and Fuzzy Logic to Determine the Level of Sustainability in Restaurants

Author

Listed:
  • Thiago José Loçurdo Costa

    (Department of Administration, State University of Londrina, Londrina 86010-190, Brazil)

  • Reginaldo Fidelis

    (Department of Mathematics, Federal University of Technology–Paraná, Londrina 86010-190, Brazil)

  • Luciano Munck

    (Department of Administration, State University of Londrina, Londrina 86010-190, Brazil)

  • Diogo José Horst

    (Department of Mechanical Enginnering and Sciences, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Joinville 86010-190, Brazil)

  • Pedro Paulo De Andrade Junior

    (Department of Mechanical Enginnering and Sciences, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Joinville 86010-190, Brazil)

Abstract

Restaurants are one of the main sources of wealth in the tourism sector and have significant potential in the fight against poverty reduction and the lack of development of local communities. However, in relation to the emission of greenhouse gases and the generation of waste, they are seen as two of the less sustainable sectors of the world. This study has the objective of providing a method to determine the level of sustainability in restaurants by means of modeling the OKR method and fuzzy logic. For this, 100 key results from the environmental, social, and economic dimensions were selected, using the fuzzy direct rating method to validate and weight the key results. The method is shown in advance, noting how and at what intensity the key results are inserted in the restaurant, indicating the strong and weak points of each restaurant in regard to sustainability. The results of this study contribute by providing a method that measures the level of sustainability in restaurants, identifies the current panorama and existing challenges, and allows for a complete mapping for the elaboration of strategies for improvements in organizational sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Thiago José Loçurdo Costa & Reginaldo Fidelis & Luciano Munck & Diogo José Horst & Pedro Paulo De Andrade Junior, 2023. "Using the OKR Method and Fuzzy Logic to Determine the Level of Sustainability in Restaurants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:6065-:d:1112921
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/6065/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/6065/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhu, Qinghua & Sarkis, Joseph & Lai, Kee-hung, 2008. "Confirmation of a measurement model for green supply chain management practices implementation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 261-273, February.
    2. Purba Rao & Alok Kumar Singh & Olivia la O'Castillo & Ponciano S. Intal & Ather Sajid, 2009. "A metric for corporate environmental indicators … for small and medium enterprises in the Philippines," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(1), pages 14-31, January.
    3. Gimenez, Cristina & Sierra, Vicenta & Rodon, Juan, 2012. "Sustainable operations: Their impact on the triple bottom line," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 149-159.
    4. Sunny Ham & Seoki Lee, 2011. "US Restaurant Companies' Green Marketing via Company Websites: Impact on Financial Performance," Tourism Economics, , vol. 17(5), pages 1055-1069, October.
    5. Yang, Ma Ga (Mark) & Hong, Paul & Modi, Sachin B., 2011. "Impact of lean manufacturing and environmental management on business performance: An empirical study of manufacturing firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(2), pages 251-261, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Zhen & Subramanian, Nachiappan & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Abdulrahman, Muhammad D. & Liu, Chang, 2015. "Composite sustainable manufacturing practice and performance framework: Chinese auto-parts suppliers׳ perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PA), pages 219-233.
    2. Ruifeng Gong & Jian Xue & Laijun Zhao & Oleksandra Zolotova & Xiaoqing Ji & Yan Xu, 2019. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Green Supply Chain Management Based on the Web of Science (WOS) Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Lin Wu & Nachiappan Subramanian & Angappa Gunasekaran & Muhammad Dan‐Asabe Abdulrahman & Kulwant Singh Pawar & Des Doran, 2018. "A two‐dimensional, two‐level framework for achieving corporate sustainable development: Assessing the return on sustainability initiatives," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1117-1130, December.
    4. Tao, Zhibin & Chao, Jiaxiao, 2024. "Unlocking new opportunities in the industry 4.0 era, exploring the critical impact of digital technology on sustainable performance and the mediating role of GSCM practices," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 3(3).
    5. Das, Kanchan, 2018. "Integrating lean systems in the design of a sustainable supply chain model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 177-190.
    6. Chrisovalantis Malesios & Antonis Skouloudis & Prasanta Kumar Dey & Fouad Ben Abdelaziz & Apostolos Kantartzis & Konstantinos Evangelinos, 2018. "Impact of small‐ and medium‐sized enterprises sustainability practices and performance on economic growth from a managerial perspective: Modeling considerations and empirical analysis results," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 960-972, November.
    7. Hepu Deng & Feng Luo & Santoso Wibowo, 2018. "Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making for Green Supply Chain Management under Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-13, September.
    8. Genc, Talat S. & De Giovanni, Pietro, 2020. "Closed-loop supply chain games with innovation-led lean programs and sustainability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 440-456.
    9. Liu, Yang & Zhu, Qinghua & Seuring, Stefan, 2017. "Linking capabilities to green operations strategies: The moderating role of corporate environmental proactivity," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 182-195.
    10. Ardian Qorri & Saranda Gashi & Andrzej Kraslawski, 2021. "Performance outcomes of supply chain practices for sustainable development: A meta‐analysis of moderators," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(1), pages 194-216, January.
    11. Sreedevi, R. & Saranga, Haritha, 2017. "Uncertainty and supply chain risk: The moderating role of supply chain flexibility in risk mitigation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 332-342.
    12. Lin Wu & Nachiappan Subramanian & Muhammad D. Abdulrahman & Chang Liu & Kee-hung Lai & Kulwant S. Pawar, 2015. "The Impact of Integrated Practices of Lean, Green, and Social Management Systems on Firm Sustainability Performance—Evidence from Chinese Fashion Auto-Parts Suppliers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-21, March.
    13. Sarah Behnam & Raffaella Cagliano, 2016. "Be Sustainable to Be Innovative: An Analysis of Their Mutual Reinforcement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, December.
    14. Mengying Feng & Wantao Yu & Xingyu Wang & Chee Yew Wong & Maozeng Xu & Zhi Xiao, 2018. "Green supply chain management and financial performance: The mediating roles of operational and environmental performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 811-824, November.
    15. Beske, Philip & Land, Anna & Seuring, Stefan, 2014. "Sustainable supply chain management practices and dynamic capabilities in the food industry: A critical analysis of the literature," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 131-143.
    16. Esfahbodi, Ali & Zhang, Yufeng & Liu, Yang & Geng, Duanyang, 2023. "The fallacy of profitable green supply chains: The role of green information systems (GIS) in attenuating the sustainability trade-offs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    17. Wong, Christina W.Y. & Lai, Kee-hung & Cheng, T.C.E. & Lun, Y.H. Venus, 2012. "The roles of stakeholder support and procedure-oriented management on asset recovery," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 584-594.
    18. Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo & Kumar, Vikas & Chaikittisilp, Sariya & Tan, Kim Hua, 2018. "The effect of lean methods and tools on the environmental performance of manufacturing organisations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 170-180.
    19. Wong, Christina W.Y. & Wong, Chee Yew & Boon-itt, Sakun, 2020. "Environmental management systems, practices and outcomes: Differences in resource allocation between small and large firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    20. Laura Trueba‐Castañeda & Francisco M. Somohano‐Rodríguez & Begoña Torre‐Olmo, 2024. "Does digitalisation enable small and medium‐sized enterprises to become more sustainable?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 4893-4909, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:6065-:d:1112921. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.