Author
Listed:
- Xuesong Zhang
(College of Pipeline and Civil Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China)
- Farag M. A. Altalbawy
(Department of Chemistry, University College of Duba, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 71491, Saudi Arabia
National Institute of Laser Enhanced Sciences (NILES), University of Cairo, Giza 12613, Egypt)
- Tahani A. S. Gasmalla
(Department of Education, University College of Duba, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 71491, Saudi Arabia)
- Ali Hussein Demin Al-Khafaji
(Department of Laboratories, Techniques, Al-Mustaqbal University College, Babylon, Hillah 51001, Iraq)
- Amin Iraji
(Engineering Faculty of Khoy, Urmia University of Technology, Urmia 5716693188, Iran)
- Rahmad B. Y. Syah
(PUIN-Engineering Faculty, Universitas Medan Area, Medan 20223, Indonesia)
- Moncef L. Nehdi
(Department of Civil Engineering, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4M6, Canada)
Abstract
This research was conducted to forecast the uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) of rocks via the random forest, artificial neural network, Gaussian process regression, support vector machine, K-nearest neighbor, adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system, simple regression, and multiple linear regression approaches. For this purpose, geo-mechanical and petrographic characteristics of sedimentary rocks in southern Iran were measured. The effect of petrography on geo-mechanical characteristics was assessed. The carbonate and sandstone samples were classified as mudstone to grainstone and calc-litharenite, respectively. Due to the shallow depth of the studied mines and the low amount of quartz minerals in the samples, the rock bursting phenomenon does not occur in these mines. To develop UCS predictor models, porosity, point load index, water absorption, P-wave velocity, and density were considered as inputs. Using variance accounted for, mean absolute percentage error, root-mean-square-error, determination coefficient (R 2 ), and performance index (PI), the efficiency of the methods was evaluated. Analysis of model criteria using multiple linear regression allowed for the development of a user-friendly equation, which proved to have adequate accuracy. All intelligent methods (with R 2 > 90%) had excellent accuracy for estimating UCS. The percentage difference of the average of all six intelligent methods with the measured value was equal to +0.28%. By comparing the methods, the accuracy of the support vector machine with radial basis function in predicting UCS was (R 2 = 0.99 and PI = 1.92) and outperformed all the other methods investigated.
Suggested Citation
Xuesong Zhang & Farag M. A. Altalbawy & Tahani A. S. Gasmalla & Ali Hussein Demin Al-Khafaji & Amin Iraji & Rahmad B. Y. Syah & Moncef L. Nehdi, 2023.
"Performance of Statistical and Intelligent Methods in Estimating Rock Compressive Strength,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-22, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:5642-:d:1105400
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:5642-:d:1105400. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.