IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i6p5230-d1098303.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of the Extremely Poor Students Selection Process for Receiving the Teacher Production Project Scholarship for Protected Schools in Thailand

Author

Listed:
  • Chulida Hemtasin

    (Department of General Science, Faculty of Education and Educational Innovation, Kalasin University, Kalasin 46230, Thailand)

  • Wisarut Payoungkiattikun

    (Department of General Science, Faculty of Education and Educational Innovation, Kalasin University, Kalasin 46230, Thailand)

  • Anucha Pimsak

    (Department of Thai, Faculty of Education and Educational Innovation, Kalasin University, Kalasin 46230, Thailand)

  • Narueta Hongsa

    (Department of English, Faculty of Education and Educational Innovation, Kalasin University, Kalasin 46230, Thailand)

Abstract

This study aimed to develop a systematic process for selecting scholarship recipients to participate in the Krurakthin project at Kalasin University. To gather insights into the selection process, stakeholders from five distinct groups, including the director of the educational service area, the director of the destination school, community leaders, lecturers, and scholarship recipients, were interviewed. This study represents the preliminary stage of analysis and process development. The research instruments consisted of (1) an opinion interview form on the scholarship recipient selection process and (2) a form for evaluating the appropriateness of the selection procedure for scholarship recipients. The data were analyzed statistically by comparing the means and standard deviations. The research findings prompted the development of a procedure for selecting scholarship recipients. Regarding the appropriateness of the scholarship recipient selection process, it was found that the appropriateness of the advertisement process was scored at 4.55 ± 0.50 points, which was at the highest level. The appropriateness of the finding process was scored at 4.73 ± 0.45 points, which was at the highest level. The appropriateness of the screening process was scored at 4.58 ± 0.50 points, which was at the highest level. Additionally, the appropriateness of the selection process was 4.54 ± 0.64 points, which was at the highest level. Each process had a total appropriateness score of 4.61 + 0.32 points, which is considered to be at the highest level. These results led to the production of a manual for choosing scholarship candidates to enroll in the Krurakthin project at Kalasin University and to prepare for the field test of the selection process of 4th-year Krurakthin students.

Suggested Citation

  • Chulida Hemtasin & Wisarut Payoungkiattikun & Anucha Pimsak & Narueta Hongsa, 2023. "Development of the Extremely Poor Students Selection Process for Receiving the Teacher Production Project Scholarship for Protected Schools in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-21, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5230-:d:1098303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5230/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5230/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marieke Vandeweyer & Ricardo Espinoza & Laura Reznikova & Miso Lee & Thanit Herabat, 2020. "Thailand’s education system and skills imbalances: Assessment and policy recommendations," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1641, OECD Publishing.
    2. Durongkaveroj, Wannaphong, 2022. "Recent Developments in Basic Education in Thailand: Issues and Challenges," ADBI Working Papers 1322, Asian Development Bank Institute.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5230-:d:1098303. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.