IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i4p3709-d1071724.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Does Embedding Angle Affect Root–Soil Mechanical Interactions?

Author

Listed:
  • Chaobo Zhang

    (College of Water Resources Science and Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China)

  • Xiaohui Feng

    (College of Water Resources Science and Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China)

  • Geng Qu

    (Key Laboratory of the Regulation and Flood Control of Middle and Lower Reaches of the Changjiang River under Ministry of Water Resources, Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan 430010, China)

  • Qihong Yang

    (Key Laboratory of the Regulation and Flood Control of Middle and Lower Reaches of the Changjiang River under Ministry of Water Resources, Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan 430010, China)

  • Jing Jiang

    (College of Water Resources Science and Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China)

Abstract

Root–soil mechanical interactions are of vital importance in soil reinforcement by plant roots. However, it is unclear how the angles of the roots in the soil affect the root–soil mechanical interactions. To better understand the effect of this factor on root–soil mechanical interactions, pullout tests were conducted on alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) roots with five root diameter groups (0.10–0.30 mm, 0.31–0.50 mm, 0.51–0.70 mm, 0.71–0.90 mm and 0.91–1.10 mm) and four embedding angles (30°, 45°, 60° and 90°) in sandy loam soil. Root tensile tests were also carried out to understand the process of root failure in the pullout tests. The results showed that the roots had two failure modes, slippage failure and breakage failure. The critical diameter of the two failure modes was 0.35 mm. Peak pullout force and pullout energy were positively related to the root diameter in power functions. Displacement was negatively related to the root diameter and embedding angle in exponential functions. Peak pullout force, root–soil friction coefficient and pullout energy all increased and then decreased with increasing embedding angles. The peak pullout force and root–soil friction coefficient reached their maximum values under an embedding angle of 60°, and pullout energy reached the maximum value under an embedding angle of 45°. Pullout energy was suggested as a preferred index of root–soil mechanical interactions for both thick/fine roots and inclined/upright roots.

Suggested Citation

  • Chaobo Zhang & Xiaohui Feng & Geng Qu & Qihong Yang & Jing Jiang, 2023. "How Does Embedding Angle Affect Root–Soil Mechanical Interactions?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-15, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3709-:d:1071724
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3709/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3709/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shihang Ruan & Lixia Tang & Tongli Huang, 2022. "The Pullout Mechanical Properties of Shrub Root Systems in a Typical Karst Area, Southwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Jung-Tai Lee & Cheng-Ying Shih & Jia-Tsung Wang & You-Hua Liang & Yu-Shan Hsu & Ming-Jen Lee, 2022. "Root Traits and Erosion Resistance of Three Endemic Grasses for Estuarine Sand Drift Control," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-15, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shihan Yang & Xiaodong Ji & Donghui Zhao & Shusen Liu, 2023. "Response of the Anchoring Performance at Betula platyphylla ’s Root–Soil Interface to Cyclic Loading," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-20, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3709-:d:1071724. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.